UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
This study examined the test taking strategies of weak ESL students of an English language proficiency course. Test taking strategies are known as the methods that test takers use as an alternative aimed at attaining correct answers on a specified form of language assessment. The study adopted a qualitative study. The participants in this study were forty-four learners from the Bachelor of Arts Program. The learners were asked to think aloud while reading an assigned text to answer the questions. Four learners? thinking aloud recordings were transcribed and analysed. Focus group interviews were carried out for triangulation purposes. Data collected were analysed manually. The ESL learners implemented many test taking strategies as they coped with the reading comprehension test. The findings of the study show how ESL students used cognitive, metacognitive, compensating, and social strategies. Participants expressed that understanding and reading the passage allowed them to draw conclusions better in answering the multiple choice questions. The findings revealed that they used a compensation strategy whereby they tried guessing the answers on a number of occasions. The findings of the study implicate teachers? ? 2021, Syiah Kuala University. All rights reserved. |
References |
Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2016). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. Handbook of reading research (pp. 285-310) Retrieved from www.scopus.com Alfassi, M. (2004). Reading to learn: Effects of combined strategy instruction on high school students. Journal of Educational Research, 97(4), 171-185. doi:10.3200/JOER.97.4.171-185 Allan, A. (1992). Development and validation of a scale to measure test-wiseness in EFL/ESL reading test takers. Language Testing, 9(2), 101-119. doi:10.1177/026553229200900201 Assiri, M. S. (2011). Test-Taking Strategy use on the Reading Section of the TOEFL iBT: A Study of Arab ESL Learners, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Assiri, M. S. (2016). Integration of stimulated recall, self-observation, and retrospective interview in the collection of strategy data in computer-assisted language testing. Studies in English Language Teaching, 4(1), 104-122. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Assiri, M. S., & Alodhahi, E. A. (2018). Test-taking strategies on reading comprehension tests: A review of major research themes. Studies in English Language Teaching, 6(3), 207-227. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Language Testing in Practice, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Language Testing in Practice, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Best, J. W., & Kahn, J. V. (1998). Research in Education, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Birch, B. M. (2002). English L2 Reading: Getting to the Bottom, Retrieved from www.scopus.com BLOCK, E. L. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 319-343. doi:10.2307/3587008 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Cohen, A. D. (1986). Mentalistic measures in reading strategy research: Some recent findings. English for Specific Purposes, 5(2), 131-145. doi:10.1016/0889-4906(86)90019-0 Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies and processes in test taking and SLA. Interfaces between Second Language Acquisition and Language Testing Research, , 90-111. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Cohen, A. D. (2014). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Strategies in learning and using a second language (pp. 1-425) doi:10.4324/9781315833200 Retrieved from www.scopus.com Cohen, A. D. (1992). Test-taking strategies on language tests. Journal of English and Foreign Languages, 10-11, 90-105. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Cohen, A. D., & Aphek, E. (1979). Easifying second language learning. Easifying Second Language Learning (Report Submitted to the Jacob Hiatt Institute), Retrieved from www.scopus.com Cohen, A. D., & Upton, T. A. (2006). Strategies in responding to the new TOEFL reading tasks. Strategies in Responding to the New TOEFL Reading Tasks, (1) Retrieved from www.scopus.com Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Dawadi, S., & Shrestha, P. N. (2018). Construct validity of the nepalese school leaving english reading test. Educational Assessment, 23(2), 102-120. doi:10.1080/10627197.2018.1430511 Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239-264. doi:10.3102/00346543061002239 Farr, R., Pritchard, R., & Smitten, B. (1990). A description of what happens when an examinee takes a Multiple‐Choice reading comprehension test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27(3), 209-226. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00744.x Ghafournia, N., & Afghari, A. (2013). The interaction between reading comprehension cognitive test-taking strategies, test performance, and cognitive language learning strategies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 80-84. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Gopal, R., & Singh, C. K. S. (2020). Arising reading patterns in understanding literary texts. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 407-420. doi:10.24815/siele.v7i2.16663 Green, A. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis in language testing research: A handbook. Verbal Protocol Analysis in Language Testing Research: A Handbook, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Hamzah, M. S. G., & Abdullah, S. K. (2009). Analysis on metacognitive strategies in reading and writing among malaysian esl learners in four education institutions. European Journal of Social Sciences, 11(4), 676-683. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching Second Language Reading, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Jung, J. (2017). Effects of Task Complexity, Glossing and Working Memory on L2 Reading and L2 Learning, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Kashkouli, Z., & Barati, H. (2013). Type of test-taking strategies and task-based reading assessment: A case in iranian EFL learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1580-1589. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Kitzinger, J., & Barbour, R. S. (1999). Introduction: The challenge and promise of focus groups. Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice, , 1-20. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Lee, J. Y. (2015). Language learner strategy by chinese-speaking EFL readers when comprehending familiar and unfamiliar texts. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 71-95. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Lin, L., Lam, J. W. -., & Tse, S. K. (2019). Test takers’ strategy use and L2 chinese reading test performance in mainland china: A structural equation approach. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 189-198. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.01.002 Lumley, T., & Brown, A. (2004). Test Taker Response to Integrated Reading/writing Tasks in TOEFL: Evidence from Writers, Texts, and Raters, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Mokhtari, K., Sheorey, R., & Reichard, C. (2008). Measuring the reading strategies of first- and second-language readers. Reading Strategies of First- and Second-Language Learners: See how they Read, , 43-65. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Nam, Y. K. (2015). Korean EFL learners’ strategy use in gap-filling inference items. English Teaching, 70(4), 81. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Nemati, A. (2016). Reading test taking strategies: A study on iranian EFL undergraduates. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Nosrati, V. (2015). Reading test taking strategies in general training IELTS. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(5), 134-142. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher should Know, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Oxford, R. L. (2003). Language learning styles and strategies: An overview. Language Learning Styles and Strategies: An Overview, , 1-25. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26-56. doi:10.1191/0265532203lt243oa Powers, D. E., & Leung, S. W. (1995). Answering the new SAT reading comprehension questions without the passages. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(2), 105-129. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1995.tb00458.x Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal Protocols of Reading: The Nature of Constructively Responsive Reading, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Rafi, M. F., & Islam, A. F. (2017). Test taking strategy on students’ reading test. Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(7), 42-51. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Rodrigues, S. (2006). "A" in exam, "F" in interview. The Star, N47 Retrieved from www.scopus.com Rupp, A. A., Ferne, T., & Choi, H. (2006). How assessing reading comprehension with multiple-choice questions shapes the construct: A cognitive processing perspective. Language Testing, 23(4), 441-474. doi:10.1191/0265532206lt337oa Singh, C. K. S., Gopal, R., Ong, E. T., Singh, T. S. M., Mostafa, N. A., & Singh, R. K. A. (2020). ESL teachers' strategies to foster higher-order thinking skills to teach writing. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 17(2), 195-226. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Singh, C. K. S., & Samad, A. A. (2013). Portfolio as an assessment tool and its implementation in malaysian ESL classrooms: A study in two secondary schools. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 21(4), 1255-1273. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Singhal, M. (2001). Reading proficiency, reading strategies, metacognitive awareness and L2 readers. The Reading Matrix, 1(1), 1-23. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Song, K., Na, B., & Kwon, H. J. (2020). A comprehensive review of research on reading comprehension strategies of learners reading in english-as-an-additional language. Educational Research Review, 29 doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100308 Stemmer, B. (1991). What's on a C-Test Taker's Mind: Mental Processes in C-Test Taking, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Sukadari, Prihono, E. W., Singh, C. K. S., Syahruzah, J. K., & Wu, M. (2020). The implementation of character education through local wisdom based learning. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, (4), 389-403. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Swaran Singh, C. K., Lebar, O., Kepol, N., Rahman, R. A., & Mukhtar, K. A. M. (2017). An observation of classroom assessment practices among lecturers in selected malaysian higher learning institutions. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14(1), 23-61. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Takallou, F., Vahdany, F., Araghi, S. M., & Tabrizi, A. R. N. (2016). Test taking strategy instruction in the national university entrance examination (NUEE) english section. International Journal of Asian Social Science, 6(3), 177-191. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Varutharaju, E., & Ratnavadivel, N. (2014). Enhancing higher order thinking skills through clinical simulation. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 11(1), 75-100. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Vattanapath, R., & Jaiprayoon, K. (1999). An assessment of the effectiveness of teaching test-taking strategies for multiple-choice english reading comprehension test. Occasional Papers, 8, 57-71. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Wu, A. D., Chen, M., & Stone, J. E. (2017). Investigating how test takers change their strategies to handle difficulty in taking a reading comprehension test: Implications for score validation. International Journal of Testing, 17(4), 1-23. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Wu, A. D., & Stone, J. E. (2016). Validation through understanding test-taking strategies: An illustration with the CELPIP-general reading pilot test using structural equation modeling. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(4), 362-379. doi:10.1177/0734282915608575 Zhang, L. (2016). Chinese college test takers’ individual differences and reading test performance: A structural equation modeling approach. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 122(3), 725-741. doi:10.1177/0031512516648131 |
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |