UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| English is an SVO (Subject, Verb, Object) word order language. This canonical SVO pattern is the default unmarked word-order configuration typical of English, which makes this language to be classified under the typology of SVO languages. However, driven by the major purpose of language as an instrument of human communication and social interaction, and as a semantic system for making meanings, addressors sometimes depart in their discourse from this basic canonical order of constituents where a grammaticalized system like inversion takes place, resulting in inverted constructions. Through testing and developing the Degree of Focus Hypothesis, proposed by Huffman (1993), this study, which employed a mixed methods research design, sought to explore the communicative and semantic values of inversion; and the pragmalinguistc functions of preposing, i.e., clause-initial adjuncts, to the pragmatic process of communication. The study confirmed the Degree of Focus Hypothesis where the hypothesized notion of concentration of attention stemming from inversion was found to be applicable. The paper stressed that what triggers inversion or non-inversion is a certain communicative effect such as focus rather than a relation of formal determination where one element determines mechanically the form or appearance of another. A contribution to linguistic and educational research, the paper, therefore,. ? 2021, Syiah Kuala University. All rights reserved. |
| References |
Abbott, M. (2002). Using music to promote L2 learning among adult learners. TESOL Journal, 11(1), 10-17. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Abuzer, K. D. (2017). Word order and inversion [paper presentation]. International Scientific and Practical Conference “World Science, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Assaiqeli, A. (2019). God taught adam and spoke to moses: Language origin, functions and early multilingual development. International Journal of Linguistics, 11(5), 1-38. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Beck, A. (2002). Writing strategies worksheet. TESOL, 11(1), 34-35. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Comrie, B. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Connolly, J. H. (1991). Constituent Order in Functional Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Cowell, S. (1997). The Players: A Novel of the Young Shakespeare, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Croft, W. (1990). Typology and Universals, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Dik, S. C. (1989). The Theory of Functional Grammar.Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Eskey, D. E. (2002). Reading and the teaching of L2 reading. TESOL Journal, 11(1), 5-9. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Gee, J. P. (1996). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Goutsos, D. (1997). Modeling Discourse Topic: Sequential Relations and Strategies in Expository Text, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Govindasamy, S., & David, M. K. (2002). Literary practices: Developing hypothesis about the functions of english word order patterns in texts. Developing Reading Skills, , 75-94. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Hartvigson, H., & Jakobsen, L. (1974). Inversion in Present-Day English, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Huffman, A. (1993). Full-Verb Inversion in English: A Functional Analysis, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse Analysis, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Lock, G. (1996). Functional english grammar: An introduction for second language teachers. Functional English Grammar: An Introduction for Second Language Teachers, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Pourdana, N. (2020). Duplicity in political texts: Are lie-spotting strategies efficient in L2 contexts? The Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 8(1), 18-30. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Prado-Alonso, C. (2019). Obligatory inversion in scientific texts. Studia Neophilologica, 91(3), 314-335. doi:10.1080/00393274.2019.1652112 Quirk, R., & Greenbaum, S. (1973). A University Grammar of English, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the english language. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Reid, W. (1991). Verb and Noun Number: A Functional Approach, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Samsudin, Z. (2016). Comparing the process approach with the product approach in teaching academic writing to first-year undergraduates. The Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 4, 84-104. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Shin, S. J. (2002). Ten techniques for successful writing tutorials. TESOL Journal, 11, 25-31. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Svendson, A. (2002). Season it with haiku. TESOL, 11(1), 38-39. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Swan, M. (1995). Practical English Usage, Retrieved from www.scopus.com Warner, A. (2007). Parameters of variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in late middle english. English Language and Linguistics, 11(1), 81-111. doi:10.1017/S1360674306002127 Waugh, L. R., & Halle, M. (1984). Roman Jakobson.Russian and Slavic Grammar.Studies 1931-1981., Retrieved from www.scopus.com |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |