Inversion and word order in English: a functional perspective

Maniam, Mahendran

Abstract

English is an SVO (Subject, Verb, Object) word order language. This canonical SVO pattern is the default unmarked word-order configuration typical of English, which makes this language to be classified under the typology of SVO languages. However, driven by the major purpose of language as an instrument of human communication and social interaction, and as a semantic system for making meanings, addressors sometimes depart in their discourse from this basic canonical order of constituents where a grammaticalized system like inversion takes place, resulting in inverted constructions. Through testing and developing the Degree of Focus Hypothesis, proposed by Huffman (1993), this study, which employed a mixed methods research design, sought to explore the communicative and semantic values of inversion; and the pragmalinguistc functions of preposing, i.e., clause-initial adjuncts, to the pragmatic process of communication. The study confirmed the Degree of Focus Hypothesis where the hypothesized notion of concentration of attention stemming from inversion was found to be applicable. The paper stressed that what triggers inversion or non-inversion is a certain communicative effect such as focus rather than a relation of formal determination where one element determines mechanically the form or appearance of another. A contribution to linguistic and educational research, the paper, therefore,. ? 2021, Syiah Kuala University. All rights reserved.

References

Abbott, M. (2002). Using music to promote L2 learning among adult learners. TESOL Journal, 11(1), 10-17. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Abuzer, K. D. (2017). Word order and inversion [paper presentation]. International Scientific and Practical Conference “World Science, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Assaiqeli, A. (2019). God taught adam and spoke to moses: Language origin, functions and early multilingual development. International Journal of Linguistics, 11(5), 1-38. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Beck, A. (2002). Writing strategies worksheet. TESOL, 11(1), 34-35. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Brown, H. D. (2001). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Comrie, B. (1981). Language Universals and Linguistic Typology, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Connolly, J. H. (1991). Constituent Order in Functional Grammar: Synchronic and Diachronic Perspectives, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Cowell, S. (1997). The Players: A Novel of the Young Shakespeare, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Croft, W. (1990). Typology and Universals, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Dik, S. C. (1989). The Theory of Functional Grammar.Part 1: The Structure of the Clause, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Eskey, D. E. (2002). Reading and the teaching of L2 reading. TESOL Journal, 11(1), 5-9. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Gee, J. P. (1996). Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Goutsos, D. (1997). Modeling Discourse Topic: Sequential Relations and Strategies in Expository Text, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Govindasamy, S., & David, M. K. (2002). Literary practices: Developing hypothesis about the functions of english word order patterns in texts. Developing Reading Skills, , 75-94. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Hartvigson, H., & Jakobsen, L. (1974). Inversion in Present-Day English, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Huffman, A. (1993). Full-Verb Inversion in English: A Functional Analysis, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Johnstone, B. (2002). Discourse Analysis, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Lock, G. (1996). Functional english grammar: An introduction for second language teachers. Functional English Grammar: An Introduction for Second Language Teachers, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Pourdana, N. (2020). Duplicity in political texts: Are lie-spotting strategies efficient in L2 contexts? The Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 8(1), 18-30. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Prado-Alonso, C. (2019). Obligatory inversion in scientific texts. Studia Neophilologica, 91(3), 314-335. doi:10.1080/00393274.2019.1652112

Quirk, R., & Greenbaum, S. (1973). A University Grammar of English, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the english language. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Reid, W. (1991). Verb and Noun Number: A Functional Approach, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Samsudin, Z. (2016). Comparing the process approach with the product approach in teaching academic writing to first-year undergraduates. The Asian Journal of English Language & Pedagogy, 4, 84-104. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Shin, S. J. (2002). Ten techniques for successful writing tutorials. TESOL Journal, 11, 25-31. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Svendson, A. (2002). Season it with haiku. TESOL, 11(1), 38-39. Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Swan, M. (1995). Practical English Usage, Retrieved from www.scopus.com

Warner, A. (2007). Parameters of variation between verb-subject and subject-verb order in late middle english. English Language and Linguistics, 11(1), 81-111. doi:10.1017/S1360674306002127

Waugh, L. R., & Halle, M. (1984). Roman Jakobson.Russian and Slavic Grammar.Studies 1931-1981., Retrieved from www.scopus.com