UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad
Title :Analisis ciri-ciri Pembelajaran Kawalan Kendiri (PKK) pelajar Sains tingkatan empat daripada aspek motivasi dan strategi pembelajaran berasaskan profil demografi (IR)
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2010
Notes :masters
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
This Self-Regulated Learning research was conducted to profile and analyze motivational aspects and learning strategies of science students in Malaysia. An improved instrument in Bahasa Melayu called The Motivation Strategies of Learning Questionnaire-Revised or ‘MSLQ-R’ was developed for this purpose. This instrument was adapted from Motivation Strategies of Learning Questionnaire ‘MSLQ’ developed by Pintrich et al., (1991). The Cronbach alpha values for the first pilot study were 0.817 for motivation and 0.922 for the learning strategies. In the second pilot study the aspect of motivation had a value of 0.894 the while learning strategies was 0.927. Both pilot studies revealed a high internal reliability of the instrument. The findings showed that the mean score of motivation (5.34) is higher than the mean score for the learning strategies (4.55). A multiple regresion test conducted on the hyphotesis showed that the two dimensions, namely motivation (β=0.21, T=4.15, p < 0.00) and learning strategies (β=-0.23, T=-4.65, p < 0.00) were significant predictors of Self-Regulated Learning. There was no significant difference between students of different demographic background on SRL as a whole, motivation (p > 0.05, p > 0.05) however a significant difference was shown in the learning strategies (p=0.01 < 0.05). There was a significant difference between different genders in SRL. This difference was seen in motivation (p < 0.05, p < 0.05) but not in the learning strategies (p=0.07 > 0.05). There is a significant difference between the different races (Malays, Chinese and Indians) on both motivation and learning strategies (p < 0.05). A significant difference was also shown between high and low income groups (p=0.01 < 0.05). The qualitative analysis suggests that there are SRL characteristics in the process of teaching such as goal setting, motivation and the overall teaching method. Data from students’ interviews showed that students were active practitioners of SRL, having characteristics such as making extrinsic goal orientation, control of learning, doing rehearsals, involved in peer learning and ability to seek help. However there are other aspects of SRL that was neglected. The implication of this findings can help students, teachers, student teacher and family to understand the SRL strategies that could come into play during teaching and learning. The impact of this study is to use SRL as a tool that can be practiced and integrated into the teaching and learning of science subjects in future. Furthemore, SRL strategies may help in enhancing students academic achievement disregarding their demographic profile and status.

References

Abd.  Rahim  Rashid.  (1998).  Kaedah  dan  metodologi  yang  berkesan  pengajaran- pembelajaran   

sejarah.   Kertas   kerja   kursus   “Kursus   guru-guru   Sejarah“ MARA pada 20hb–24hb April. 

Bangunan Mara , Kuala Lumpur.

 

Ames, C. & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies  

and  motivation  processes.  Journal  of  Educational  Psychology  80 (3):260-267.

 

Anderman, L. H. & Anderman, E.M. (1999). Social predictors of changes instudents’ achievement goal 

Orientation.  Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 21- 37.

 

Anderson,  G.,  Benjamin,  D.  &    Fuss,  M.  (1994).  The  Determinant  Of  Success  In 

University,    Introductory   Economics    Courses    .    Journal    Of    Economic Education.  

25:99-120.

 

Akersson,  V.L.,  Flick,  L.B.  &  Lederman,  N.G.  (2000).  The  influence  of  primary children’s 

ideas in science on teaching practce. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37(4): 363-385.

 

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to Research in Education

(6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning.

 

Azizi Yahya  & Jaafar Sidek Latif (2005). Membentuk Identiti Remaja. Pahang: PTS Publications & 

Distributions Sdn Bhd.

 

Azizi Yahya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaluddin Rali, Yusuf Boon & Abd. Rahim Hamdan (2007)    Mengusai    

Pendidikan    dalam    Penyelididkan;Teori,    analisis    & Interpretasi data. PTS Profesional 

Publishing Sdn. Bhd.

 

Baker, D. (2003). Equity issues in science education. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.),

International Handbook of Science Education. London: Kluwer Academic.

 

Bandura,    A.    (1993).   Perceived    self-eficancy    in   cognitive    development    and 

functioning. Educational Psychologist 28 (2): 117-148.

 

Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy: The Exercise of control.  New York: Freeman 

 

Baird, J.R. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful enquiry and conceptual change. Dlm. E.

Hegarty-Hazel  (Ed.).  The  Student  Laboratory  and  the  Science  Curriculum.

London, Routledge.

 

Baird,  J.R.  &  Mitchell,  I.  J.  (Ed.)  (1986).  Improving  the  quality  of  teaching  and 

learning:  An  Australian  case  study  -  the  PEEL  project.  Melbourne,  Monash University 

Printery.

 

Ben-Zvi,  R.,  Eylon,  B.  &  Silberstein,  J.  (1998).  Theories,  principles  and  laws.

Education in Chemistry. 5 : 89-92.

 

Biggs,  J.B  &  Telfer  (1987).  Learning  Process  Questionnaire  Manual.  Melbourne

:Australian Council for Educational Research.

 

Beyer, B. K. (1997). Improve  student thinking: A comprehensive approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

 

Brown, A. L. (1997). Metacognition, executive control, self regulation and other more mysterious 

mechanism. In Weinert, F. E. & Kluwe, R. H.(Eds) Metacognition, motivation   and   understanding.   

65-116.   Hillsdale,   New   Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Butler,  D.  L.,  Novak  Lauscher,  H.,  Jarvis-Selinger,  S.  &  Beckingham,  B.  (2004) 

Collaboration   and   self-regulation   in   teachers’   professional   development, Teaching and 

Teacher Education 20, pp. 435- 455.

 

Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In  M.  

Boekaerts,  P.  R.  Pintrich,  &  M.  Zeidner  (Eds.),  Handbook  of  self- regulation (pp. 41–84). 

New York: Academic Press.

 

Chang, K.E., Sung, Y.T, & Chen, I.D. (2002). The Effect of Concept mapping to text comprehension 

and summarization.  Jounal of Experimental Education, 71(1). 5-23.

 

Chamot, A. U. & O'Malley, J. M. (1992). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge 

to the mainstream. Dlm. P. A. Richard-Amato dan M. A. Snow (Ed.), The multicultural classroom: 

Readings for content-area teachers. White Plains: Longman.

 

Champagne, A.B., Gunstone, R.F. & Klopfer, L.E. (1985). Cognitive research and the design of 

science instruction. Educational Psychologist. 17(5): 31-53.

 

Christine   C.M.   G   &  Zhang   Donglan  (2002).   A  Metacognitive   Framework   for Reflective  

Journals.   In:   Agnes  Chang  S.C.   &  Christine  C.M.   Goh  eds. Teachers’   Handbook   on   

Teaching   Generic   Thinking   Skills.   Singapore: Prentice Hall. 8 – 21.

 

Claudia   Gama.   (2000).   The   Role   of   Metacognition   in   Interactive   Learning 

Environments.   Kertas   kerja   dibentangkan   ITS'2000   Conference   -   Young

Researchers' Track, Montreal, California, June 2000.

 

Claudia Gama, C. (2001). Metacognition and reflection in ITS: increasing awareness to  improve  

learning.  Dlm.  J.  D.  Moore.  (Ed.).  Artificial  Intelligence  in Education. IOS Press: Brazil.

 

Grigss, S. A. (1985). Conselling students through their individual learning styles. The National 

Institute of Education, The University Of Michigans

 

Chyung,  S.  Y.  (1996).  The  effects  of  conceptual  tempo  and  computer-assisted instructional 

 environment  on  college  students’s  self-regulated  learning  and acedamic achievement.  

Dissertation abstract.  Texas Tech University.

 

Claxton, C. S. (1990). Fostering student  learning  and development through effective teaching.    

In    Robert    M.    Hashway(Ed.),    Handbook    of    Developmental Education.

 

Corno,   L.   (1996).     The   Metasognitive   Control   Compenents   of   Self-Regulated 

Learning.  Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 333-346

 

Corno,  L.,  & Mardinach (1983).   The  Role  of Cognitive  Engagement  in Classroom Learning and 

Motivation.  Educational Psychology, 18, 88-108.

 

Corno,  L.  (2001).  The  metacognitive  control components of self regulated  learning.

Contemparory Education Psychology, 11, 333-346

 

Covington,  M.V.  (2000).     Goal  theory,  motivation  and  school  achievement:  An integrative 

review.  Annual Review of Psychology 51: 171-200.

 

Cohen,  L.,  Manion,  L.  &  Marison,  K.  (2003).  Research  Methods  in  Education  (5?? edition) 

        diperolehi         pada         12         Januari         2009         daripada 

http://books.google.com/books?id=tD8lP40zoHoC&pg=PA103&lpg=PA103 

&dq=purposive+sampling+in+education+research&source=bl&ots=FsS9xH4 

uaV&sig=qTXuoYvA4JVUcd6w8XsWjUg05C0&hl=en&ei=RIyPSqfILpiVk 

AWAodW7Cg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3

 

Crow, L.D & Crow, A. (1983).  Educational Pyshocology. New York.  American Book Company.   Dalam 

Marzuki Ngah (2002).   Hubungan Antara Konsep Kendiri Akademik,Konsep   Kendiri   Bukan   Akademik  

 Dan   Motivasi   Pencapaian Terhadap      Pencapaian   Sains.      Diperoleh   Oktober   20,   

2008   daripada http://mpkt.edu.my/penyelidikan/marzuki02

 

Creswell,  J.  W.  (2003a).  Advanced  mixed  method  research  designs.  Handbook  on mixed 

methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications, 209-240.

 

Creswell,  J.   W.  (2003b).  Research  design:  Qualitative,  quantitative,  and  mixed methods 

approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating

litative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

 

Daniel,  G.  E.  (2003).  Effects  of  Cofnitive  Strategy  in  Instruction  on  Mathematical

Problem     Solving      of      Middle      School     Students      with      Learning 

Disabilities.Disertation abstract Ohio State University.

 

D'Avanzo,   C.  (2003).   Application  of  research  on  learning  to   college  teaching: 

ecological examples. Bioscience 53: 1221-28.

 

David,  J.  N.  &  Debra,  M-D.,  (2006).  A  Formative  assessment  and  self  regulated learning: 

A Model and seven priciples of good feedback practice.  Diterbitkan dalam  Studies  in  Higher  

Education  (2006),  Vol.  31(2),  199-218  diperoleh pada                     11                    

 Ogos                     2009                     daripada 

http://tltt.strath.ac.uk/REAP/public/Resources/DN_SHE_Final.pdf

 

Davidson,  J.E.,  Deuser,  R.  & Sternberg,  R.J.  (1996).  The  Role  of Metacognition  in Problem 

    Solving.     In:     Metcalfe,     J.     &     Shimamura,     A.P.     eds. 

Metacognition:Knowing about Knowing. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

 

Duncan, T. G. & McKeachie, W. J. (2005).   The Making of Motivated Strategies for Learning 

Questionnaire .  Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128.

 

Fraenkel, J.R. (1996). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. (3rd ed.) New York: 

McGraw-Hill.

 

Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognive aspects of problem solving.  In Resnick, L. B. Eds. The  nature  

of  Intelligence,  231-235.     Hilldale,  New  Jersey:     Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Fatin Aliah Phang Abdullah. (2005). Hubungan dan Peranan Kemahiran Metakognitif Dalam  

Menyelesaikan  Masalah  Fizik  Dikalangan  Pelajar  Sains  Tingkatan Empat. Universiti Teknologi 

Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana (tidak diterbitkan)

 

Gardner,  H.  (2000).     Intelligence  Reframed:   Multiple  Intelligences  for  the  21st 

Century.  New York:  Basic.

 

Gay, L.R., Mills, G. E. & Airasian, P. (2009) .Educational Research: Competencies for  Analysis  

and  Applications.  Upper  Saddle  Rier  &Columbus  :  Pearson Merill Prentice Hall.

 

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis 

and Applications. (8th edition). NJ: Pearson.

 

Gage,  N.  L.  &  Berliner,  D.  C.  (1988).  Educational  Psychology.  4th.  ed.  Boston: Houghton 

Mifflin Company. 170 – 201.

 

Gaskill,  P.  J.,  &  Murphy,  P.  K.  (2004).   Effects  on  a  memory  strategy on  second- 

graders’   performance    and    self   efficacy.       Contemporary    Educational

Psychology, 29(1), 27-49.

 

Georghiades, P. (2000). Beyond Conceptual Change Learning  in Science Education: Focusing  on  

Transfer,  Durability  and  Metacognition.  Educational  Research. 42(2): 119 – 139.

 

Gunstone,  R.  & Northfield,  J.  (1992).  Labour  Law  and  State  School Teachers:  The VICTorian 

 Experience  Australian  Schools  &  the  Law.  Dlm.  Jane  Edwards, Andrew Knott & Dan (Ed). 

Teaching in School. London: Law Book Company Limited

 

Gunstone, R.F. (1995). The importance of specific science content in the enhancemen of  

metacognition.  Dlm.  P.J.  Fensham,  R.F.  Gunstone  dan  R.T.  White  (Ed.). The content of 

science : a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: The Falmer Press.

 

Habibollah  Naderi  ,  Rohani  Abdullah,  Tengku  Aizan  Hamid  &  Jamaluddin  Sharir (2008).  

Intelligence  and  Gender  as  Predictors  of  Academic  Achievement Among  Undergraduate  

Students.  European  Journal  of  Social  Sciences  – Volume  7,   Number  2   (2008).diperoleh  

pada  2   november   2009  daripada http://www.eurojournals.com/ejss_7_2_17.pdf

 

Hadwin,  A.F.,  Winne,  P.H.,  Stockley,  D.B.,  Nesbit,  J.C.  &  Woszczyna,  C.  (2001). Context  

Moderates Students’Self Report  about  How they Study.   Journal  of Educational Psychology, 93, 

(477-485)

 

Heidrun Stoger & Albert Ziegler. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self regulated     

learning     program    for     gifted     mathematic     underachievers. International Education 

Journal, 6(2), 261–271.

 

Holloway, J. H. (2003). Addressing the needs of homeless Students. Educational Leadership 

60(4):89-91.

 

Hwang,   Y.,   &  Levin,   J.   R.,   (2002).   Examination  of  Middle   School  Students’ 

Independent  use of a  Complex Mnemonic System.   Journal of  Experimental Education, 71(1). 25-38.

 

Hwang,  Young  Suk,  &  Konstantinos  Vrongistinos.  (2002).  Elementary  inservice teachers’    

self-regulated    learning    strategies    related    to    their    academic achievements. 

Journal of Instructional Psychology 29 (3): 147-54.

 

Janssen,  D.  A.  (2006).  The  Ultimate  Self  Challenge:  Time  Management.  Diperoleh pada       

               25                      Jun                      2009                      daripada 

http://www.danieljanssen.com/ArchiveArticles/timemanagement.shtml

 

James  Kuo,  Chris Hagie  & Michael T  Miller.  (2003).  Encouraging  College  Student Success. 

International Education Journal, 14, 60–67.

 

Jenkins,  J.  M.,  &  Astington,  J.  W.  (1996).  Cognitive  factors  and  family  structure 

associated     with     theory-of-mind     development     in     young     children.

Developmental Psychology, 32, 70–78.

 

Jegede, O. J., Alaiyemola, F. F., & Okebukola, P. A. O. (1990). The effect of concept mapping on 

students' anxiety and achievement in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 

951-960.

 

Johari Surif & Mohammad Yusof Arshad (2004). Strategi Metakognitif dalam Pembelajaran Sains: Suatu 

Perspektif Baru. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 10: 1 – 16.

 

Jonassen, D.H., Carr, C. & Yueh, H.P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in 

critical thinking. Tech Trends. 43(2): 24-32

 

Johnson, A. P. (2005). A Short Guide to Action Research. 2nd ed. Boston:Pearson 

 

Jones,  L.,  Jordan,  K.  &  Stillings,  N.  (2001).  Molecular  visualization  in  science

education:report   from   the   molecular   visualization   in   science   education workshop,      

        diperoleh              pada              5.10.2009              daripada 

http://Pro3.Chem.Pitt.Edu/Workshop/Workshop_Report_180701.Pdf.

 

Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In

D.  Gabel  (Eds.),  Handbook  of  research  on  science  teaching  and  learning

(pp.13-39).

 

Kasper, L. F. (1996). Assessing the Metacognitive Growth of ESL Student Writers. TESL-EJ Vol. 3 No. 

1 November 1997.

 

Keefe,  J.W.  (1988).  Learning  Style:  Cognitive  and  thinking  skills.  Reston,  VA: National 

Association of secondary School Principles.

 

Keffe, J. (1987). Learning styles theory and practice. Reston: National Association of Secondary 

Scholls Principals.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2000). Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia 2000. KL: Kementerian 

Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia  (2004).  Projek  Sekolah  Bestari.  Diperoleh Oktober 20, 2008 

daripada http://www.moe.edu.my

 

Kopper.  (2002).  Ko-kaunselor  Pemimpin  Pelajar.  Yayasan  Nurul  Yakin:  diperoleh pada       10 

      Jun       2008       daripada       Portal       Pendidikan       Utusan. 

(http://www.tutor.com.my/tutor/kopper/index.asp?i=7)

 

Lee,  L.H.  (1997).  Goal  orientation,  goal  setting,  and  achievement  performance  in college  

students:  An  integrated  model  of  achievement  motivation  in  school settings.Doctoral 

Dissertation, University of Southern California. Dissertation

Abstracts International 59 (06A) : 1905.

 

Lee,  K.W.L.  (2002).  A  reflection  on  an  in-service  course  for  chemistry teachers  in 

Singapore.  Dlm.  T.A.  Girl,  K.W.L.  Lee,  N.K.  Goh  dan  L.S.  Chia.  New paradigms for science 

education. A perspective of teaching problem solving, creative teaching and primary science 

education. Singapura: Prentice Hall.

 

Lee, K.W.L. & Fensham, P.J. (1996). A general strategy for solving high school electrochemistry 

problems. International Journal of Science Education. 18(5): 543-555.

 

Luke, I. & Hardy,  C.A. (1999). Appreciating the  complexity of learning  in physical education:  

the  utilization  of  a  metacognitive  ability  conceptual  framework. Sport, Education and 

Society. 4(2): 175-191.

 

Levinson, D.J. (1981). “Exploration In Biography: Evolution Of The Individual Life Structure in 

Adulthood.” New York: John Wiley.

 

Long, H. B. (1990).   Understanding  Adult  Leaners.   Dalam M.  W. Galbraith, Adult Learning 

Methods: A Guide fo effective Instruction.  Malabar, Florida: Robert

E. Krieger Publishing Company.

 

Loughran, J.J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning  in learning about 

teaching. Journal of Teacher Education. 53 (1), 33-43.

 

Maria, T. C. R. & Pedro, F. C. A. (2004). Gender differences in academic motivation of secondary 

school students published  in Electronic Journal of  Research in Educational Psychology, 2(1) 

97-112 ISSN:1696-2095 (2004) diperoleh pada

23              Jun              2008              daripada              http://www.investigacion 

psicopedagogica.org/revista/articulos/3/english/ Art_3_31.pdf

 

Mayer,  (2003).   The  promise  of  multimedia  learning:  using  the  same  instructional design  

methods across different media.  Learning and Instruction. 13(1). 125- 139.

 

Martin  M.O,  Mullis,V.S,  Gonzalez,  E.J  &  Chrostowski,  S.  J.(2004).  TIMSS  2003 

International  Science  Report.  TIMSS  &  PIRLS  International  Study  Center, Lynch School of 

Education: Boston College

 

McCall, G. J., & J. L. Simmons (eds.). lssues in Participant Observation: A Text and Reader  

(Reading,  Mass.:  Addison-Wesley,  1969).  Diambil  pada  November 2008 di 

http://pod.nku.edu/pdfs/doug/geoSurvey.pdf

 

Meece, J. L. & Holt, K. (1993).  A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of 

Educational Psychology, 85, 582-590.

 

Miles,     . B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks,

CA:Sage

 

Meister,  C  &  Rosenshine,  B..  (1992).  Scaffolds  for  teaching  higher-order  cognitive 

strategies.  In  A.C.  Ornstein  (Ed.)  Teaching:  Theory  into  Practice.  Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

 

Mohamad  Johdi  Salleh.  (2003)  Interaksi  Guru-Pelajar  di  Bilik  Darjah  dan  Prestasi 

Cemerlang  Penilaian  Menengah  Rendah  (PMR).  2  -  4  September  2003. International  Seminar  

on  Learning  and  Motivation.  Organizer:  School  of Cognitive  Sciences  and  Education,  UUM.  

Venue:  Copthorne  Hotel,  Batu Ferringhi, Penang

 

Mohd Zaaba & Zuraidah Hj. Ismail (2004) dalam Abdul Sukor Shaari,Yahya Don dan Yaakob Daud (2005).  

 Motivasi Belajar Dan Harga Diri:Hubungan Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Dan Kegiatan Kokurikulum 

Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Fakulti Sains Kognitif Dan Pendidikan Universiti Utara Malaysia.   

Diperoleh Oktober                             20,                             2008                  

           daripada http://www.psb1.uum.edu.my/tesis/Penyelidikan%20Print/2005/DR.%20ABD

.%20SUKOR%20SHAARI,%20YAHYA%20DON%20DAN%20YAAKOB

%20DAUD.pdf

 

Mohd  Ruzi  (2000).   Konsep  Sekolah  Bestari.   Diperolehi  pada  15   febuari  2009 daripada  

http://www.mohdruzi.com/Konsep%20Sekolah%20Bestari.htm

 

Mohammad Yusof Arshad, Johari Surif, Tan Soo Yin, Dalina Daud & Uthayakumari a/p  

Ibrahim@Sellakutty.  (2002).  Kefahaman pelajar  mengenai konsep  zarah: Perbandingan  respon  

pelajar  di  Malaysia  dan  pelajar  di  United  Kingdom. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi 

Malaysia. 8(1): 21-38.

 

Ng Lee Yen, Kamariah Abu Bakar, Samsilah Roslan, Wong Su Lan & Petri Zabariah Megat   Abd.   Rahman 

  (2005).   Predictors   of   Self-Regulated   learning   in Malaysian  Smart  School.   

International  Education  Journal.  2005.6(3),  343- 353.

 

Ng  Wai  Kong  (1998).  Psychological  Measurement  for  Malaysian  School  Children.

Unit Kajian Penyelidikan Asas. Sekolah Pendidikan. Universiti sains Malaysia

 

Nisbet,  J.  (1991).  Methods  and  Approaches.  In:  Maclure,  S.  &  Davies,  P.  eds. Learning 

to Think: Thinking to Learn: The Proceedings of the 1989 OECD Conference   Organized   by   the   

Centre   for   Educational   Research   and Innovation. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 177 – 185.

 

Nor  Hashimah  Jalaludin  (2004).  Penguasaan  Bahasa  Melayu  oleh  Pelajar  Melayu dalam   Arus   

Globalisasi   dlm   Jurnal   Bahasa   Jld   4   Bil.   1   Mac   2004. DBP.diperolehi            

pada            12            Ogos            2009            daripada 

http://www.eurojournals.com/ejss_7_2_09.pdf

 

Osborn  ,  R.J.  &  Wittrock,  M.C.  (1983).  Learning  science  :  A  generative  process.

Science Education. 67(4) : 489-504

 

Osborne, R.J., Bell, B.F & Gilbert, J. (1983). Children’s science and its consequences

for teaching. Science Education. 66(4): 623-633.

 

Osman Mohamed & Hannafin (1992). Metacognitive Research and Theory: Analysis and  Implications  for 

 Instructional Design.  Educational  Technology  Research and Development. 40(2): 83 – 99.

 

Paris, S. G., Byrnes, J. P. & Paris, A. H. (2001).   Contructing theroies, identities and action of 

self-regulated  learners.   Dalam B.  J.  Zimmerman & D.H.  Schunck (Eds)    Self-Regulated    

Learning    &   Academic    achievement:    Theoritical Perspective (pp 253-287) Hillsdale, 

NJ:Erlbaum.

 

Paris,  S.  G.,  &  Winograd,  P.  (1990).  Promoting  metacognition  and  motivation  of 

exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 7-15.

 

Phillips,  D.  &  Zimmerman,  M.  (1990).  The  developmental  course  of  perceived competence   

and   incompetence   among   competent   children.   Dalam   R.J. Sternberg  &  J.  Kolligian,  

eds.,  Competence  Considered  (pp.  41–66).  New Haven, CT: YaleUniversity Press.

 

Pintrich,  P.R  &  DeGroot,  E.V.  (1990).    Motivational  and  self-regulated  learning 

components  of  classroom  academic  performance.  Journal  of  Educational Psychology 82 (1): 

33-40.

 

Pintrich, P. R. (Ed) (1995).  Understanding Self-Regulated Learning.  New Directions for Teaching 

and Learning. No 63. Jossey-Bass In.

 

Pitrinch, P.R., Smith, D. A., Gracia, T., & MacKeachie, W.J. (1991).   A Manual for the   use   of  

 Motivated   Strategies   for   Learning   Questionnaire   (MLSQ). Technical Report No. 91-B-004.  

The Regents of The University of Michigan.

 

Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A., Garcia, T. & Mc  Keachie,  W.J. (1993).   Reliability and predictive  

validity  of  the  motivated  strategies  for  learning  questionnaires (MSLQ). Educational & 

Psychological Measurement 53 (3): 801-813.

 

Pintrich, P.R.,(2000). Educational Psychology at the Millennium. A look back and  a look foward.  

Educational Psychology 35, 221-226

 

Pintrich,  P.R.  &  Schunk,  D.H.  (2002).  Motivation  in  Education:  Theory,  Research, and  

Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.

 

Pintrich, P. R., dan Zusho, A. (2002). The Development of Academic self regulation: The  Role  of  

Cognitive  and  motivational  factors.  Dalam  .  Wigfield  &  J.  S. Eccles   (Eds.),   

Development  of   achievement  motivation  (pp.249-284)   San Diego, CA: Academic.

 

Pencapaian  Sanis  dan  Matematik  dalam  Bahasa  Inggeris:  Bandar  dan  Luar  Bandar

(2005, 5 April).  Utusan Malaysia, ms 8

 

Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (1990). What we really know about strategy instruction.

Education Leadership, 48, 31-34.

 

Pusat  Perkembangan  Kurikulum  (2001).  Draf  Huraian  Sukatan  Pelajaran  Fizik  : KBSM    

Tingkatan    Empat.    Kementerian    Pendidikan    Malaysia    :    Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.

 

Rashidi  Azizan  &  Abdul  Razak  Habib  (1998).  Pengajaran  dalam  bilik  darjah: Kaedah dan 

strategi. Kajang: Masa Enterprise.

 

Reber, A. S. (1985). Dictionary of Psychology. New Zealand: Penguin Books. Rickey, D & Stacy, A.M. 

(2000). The Role of Metacognition in Learning Chemistry.

Journal of Chemical Education. 77(7): 915 – 920.

 

Rop, C.J. (1999). Student Perspectives on Success in High School Chemistry. Journal of Research in 

Science Teaching. 36(2): 221 – 237.

 

Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organization Behavior: Concept, Controvercies applications.

New Zealand: Penguin Books.

 

Rohani  Abdullah.  (2001).  Perkembangan  kanak-kanak.  Penilaian  secara  portfolio.

Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Sadiah Baharom, Sharifah Norhaidah Syed Idros & Nordin Abd. Razak (2003).  Self- regulatory  

cognitive  and  metacognitive  learning  starategies  of  preuniversity students:  Issues  and  

Challenges.  Dalam  kertas  kerja  yang  dibentangkan  di International Seminar on Learning and 

Motivation: Issues and Challenges in a Borderless World. (13-15 Oktober 2003, Copthorne Hotel, 

Penang)

 

Sadiah Baharom, Ong Eng Tek, Marzita Putih, Sopia Mat Yasin., Nurul Huda Abd. Rahman   &   Muhamad  

 Ikhwan   Mat   Saad,   (2009).   The   Validation   and adaptation of MSLQ  aimed  to  assess 

student  use  of self regulated  learning. Paper presented at 1?? International Conference on 

Educational Research and Practice  Enhancing  Human  Capital  through  Teacher  Education  Faculty  

of Educational Studies UPM 10-11 June 2009

 

Saemah Rahman & John Arul Phillips (2006) Tentang efikasi kendiri. Diperoleh pada

17                               ogos                               2006                            

   daripada http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/~jurfpend/journal/vol%2031%202006/full%20articl 

e%2031%202006/artikel%2031_2.pdf

 

Samsilah  Roslan,Abd.  Majid  Isa,  Othman  Mohamad  &  Rohani  Ahmad  Tarmizi (2006).    Hubungan  

  Orientasi    Matlamat    dengan    Penggunaan    Strategi Pembelajaran  Aturan  Kendiri.  

Diperoleh  pada  Januari  03,  2009  daripada

http://myais.fsktm.um.edu.my/5297/1/7.pdf

 

Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting General Metacognitive Awareness. Instructional Science.

26(1-2 ): 113 – 125.

 

Schraw,  G.,  Horn,  C,  Thorndike-Christ,  T  &  Bruning,  R.  (1995).  Academic  goal orientation 

 and  student  achievement.  Contemporary  Educational  Psychology 20:359-368.

 

Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning Theories.  New Jersey: Prantice Hall

 

Schunk,  D.  H.  &   Zimmerman,  B.  J.  (2003).  Self  Regulated  and  Learning.  Dalam

W.M.  Reynolds  dan  G.  E.  Millers  (Eds)  Handbook  of  psychology,  Vol 7:Educational 

psychology, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

 

Schurter,   W.A.   (2002).   “Comprehension  Monitoring:   An   Aid   To   Mathematical Problem 

Solving”. Journal Of Development Education. 26(2).22-32.

 

Smith,    E.    (2003).    ‘Failing    boys    and    moral    panics:    perspectives    on    the 

underachievement    debate’,  British  Journal  of    Educational  Studies,  51,  3, 282-95.

 

Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children’s 

knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51-79.

 

Shu  Ya  Zhang  &    Angela  I.  C.  (1995).  Chinese  Parents’  Influence  on  Academic 

Performance.        Diperolehi        pada        7        Nov        2009        daripada 

http://www.ncbe.gwe.edu.

 

Shulman, L. S., (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform.

Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.

 

Swanson,  H.  L.  (1990).  Influence  of  metacognitive  knowledge  and  aptitude  on problem  

solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306-314.

 

Silverman, D. (2000).  Doing Qualitative Research : A Practical Handbook.  London, Thousand Oaks. 

New Delhi: Sage.

 

Sheridan, J. C & Lyndall, G. S. (2003).  SPSS Analysis without Anguish. Version 11.0 for windows.  

John Wiley & Sons Ausrtalia, Ltd.

 

Schraeder,  L.L.  (1997).     The  Effectiveness  of  Color  Coding  on  Middle  School Students’  

Ability  to  Differentiate  Explicit  from  Implication  Information  in Narrative and Expository 

Texts.  ERIC: Ed422737

 

Sternberg,  R.  J.  (Ed.).  (2000).  Handbook  of  intelligence.  New  York:  Cambridge University 

Press

 

Tabachnick,  B.  G., & Fidell,  L.  S. (2001).  Computer-Assisted  Research  Design  and

Analysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

 

Tan, O. S. (2004). Enhancing thinking through problem based learning approaches:

International perspectives. Singapore: Thomson.

 

Thomas,  R.  &  Hoper,  E.  (1991).  Simulations  :  An  opportunity  we  are  missing.

Journal of Reseach on Computing in Education. 23(3): 497-512

 

Taylor,  S.  J.,  &  Bogdan,  R.  (1984).  Introduction  to  Qualitative  Research  Methods

(2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.

 

TIMSS  (2007).  International  Mathematics  Report:  Findings  from  IEA’s  Trends  in 

International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Boston College: TIMSS 

& PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education.

 

Unit  Perancang Ekonomi (2001). Rangka Rancangan Jangka  Panjang Ketiga 2001- 2010. Kuala Lumpur. 

Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.

 

Van  Zile-Tamsen,  C.V.  (1998).  Examining  metacognitive  self-regulation  within  the Context of 

daily academic  tasks. Doctoral Dissertation, The State University of New York,1998. Dissertation 

Abstracts International 44 (11A): 3320

 

Wan    Shazmimi    Wan    Mustapha    (2004).    Langkah    Mengekalkan    Minat    dan 

Membangkitkan Motivasi Pelajar oleh Guru-Guru sains Peringkat  Menengah Atas.   Projek Ijazah 

Sarjana Muda Sains dan pendidikan (Biologi) yang tidak diterbitkan. Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti 

Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Wan Noorazah Wan Md. Nawi. 2004. Strategi pembelajaran Biologi pelajar Melayu dan   bukan   Melayu  

 di   UKM:   Satu   tinjauan.   Latihan   Ilmiah.   Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.

 

Weinstein,  C.  E.,  Ridlay,  D.  S  &  Weber,  E.  S.  (1989).  Helping  students  develop 

strategies for effective learning. Educational Leadership 46(4).

 

Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer., R. E. (1986).  The teaching of learning strategies.  In M. C.Wittrock  

(Ed.),  Handbook  of  research  on  teaching  (3??  ed.)(pp.  315-327). New York: Mac Millan.

 

Weiner, B. (1992). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational 

Psychology 71 (1): 3-25.

 

Weiner,  B.  (1985)  An  attributional  theory  of  achievement  motivation  and  emotion,

Psychological Review 92: 548-73.

 

Winne,   P.   (1993),   "State-of-the-art   instructional   computing   systems   that   afford 

instruction and bootstrap research", in Jones, M., Winne, P.H. (Eds),Adaptive Learning 

Environments, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Vol. F85.

 

Wlodkoswki, R. J., & Jaynes, J.H. (1990). Eager to learn. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

 

Woolnaugh,   B.   E.   (1994).   Factors   afecting   students’   choice   of   science   and 

engineering. International Journal of Science Education 19(6): 659-676.

 

Wolters,  A.  (1999).  The  relationship  between  high  school  students’  motivational regulation 

  and   their   use   of   Learning   strategies,   effort   and   classroom performance. Learning 

and individual differences, 11 (3), 218-299.

 

Woolfolk, A. (1995). Educational psychology (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon (648 pp.).

 

Yayasan  Strategi  Sosial  (2005).  Masyarakat  India  di  Malaysia.  Isu  dan  Masalah RMK   

8;Cadangan   RMK   9.   diperolehi   pada    5   Nov   2009,   daripada 

http://www.digitalibrary.my/dmdocuments/malaysiakini/665_First%20Submis sion.pdf

 

Yesim  Somuncuoglu  Ali  Yildrim.  (2001).  Relationship  between  achievement  goal orientation 

and use of learning strategies. Journal of Education Research, 92, 267–276.

 

Yin,  RK.  (1984)  Case  Study  Research:  Design  and  Methods.  Sage  Publications, California, 

pp.90-91.

 

Yoong  Soon  &  Aminah  Ayob  (2005).    Students  Interest  in  Leaving  Science  & Technologies 

(S&T) Topics, Their Attitudes, Perceptions & Priorities towards Important  S&T  Issues.     School  

of  Educational  Studies.  University  Sains Malaysia.

 

Zimmerman,   B.   J.   (1989).   Models   of   self-regulated   learning   and   academic 

achievement. Dalam B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning  and  academic  

achievement:  Theory,  research,  and  practice  (pp.  1- 25). New York: Springer-Verlag.

 

Zimmerman,  B.  J.  (1997).    Becomming  a  self  regulated  learner  writer  :  A  Social 

cognitive perspective.  Contemporary Educational Psychology. 22, 73-101.

 

Zimmerman,  B.J.,  &  Schunck,  D.H.  (2001).   Self-Regulated  Learning  & Academic Achievement  : 

 Thoeritical  Perspectives  (2??  ed.)    Mahwah,  N.J:  Lawrence Elbaum.  Associates Publisher.

 

Zimmerman, B.J. (2000a).   Attaining self-regulation.   A social cognitive perspective. In  

M.Boekaerts,  P.  R.  Pintrich  &  M.  Zeidner   (Eds)  Handbook  of  Self- Regulation (pp 451-502) 

San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

 

Zimmerman, B.J. (2000b).    Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into       

Practice.(page14).       Diperoleh      Ogos       29,       2008       daripada

http://www.findarticles.com/p/atricles/mi_mONQM/is_2_41/ai_90190493/pg

 

Zimmerman,   B.J.   (2000).   Achieveing   Academic   Excellence.   A   self-Regulatory 

perspective.  En. M. Ferrari (Ed).  The pursuit of excellence through education (pp 85-110). 

Mahuah. NJ:Erlbaum.

 

Zimmerman,  B.  J.  (2004).  Sociocultural  influence  and  students’  development  of academic 

self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In D. M. McInerney, & S. Van Etten (Eds.), 

Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning:   Big   theories   revisited   

(Vol.   4,   pp.139-164).   United   States   of America.        Diperolehi        pada        18   

     Januari        2009        daripada http://www.emis.de/proceedings/PME30/4/137.pdf

 

Zuraidi  Wahid  (2008).   Kesan  Penggunaan  Modul  Pembelajaran  Regulasi  Kendiri Terhadap  

Motivasi  dan  Pencapaian  Pelajar  bagi  Tajuk  Fotosintesis  Biologi Tingkatan 4.  Tesis Sarjana 

yang tidak diterbitkan, Tanjong Malim: Universiti

Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)