UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
This Self-Regulated Learning research was conducted to profile and analyze motivational aspects and learning strategies of science students in Malaysia. An improved instrument in Bahasa Melayu called The Motivation Strategies of Learning Questionnaire-Revised or ‘MSLQ-R’ was developed for this purpose. This instrument was adapted from Motivation Strategies of Learning Questionnaire ‘MSLQ’ developed by Pintrich et al., (1991). The Cronbach alpha values for the first pilot study were 0.817 for motivation and 0.922 for the learning strategies. In the second pilot study the aspect of motivation had a value of 0.894 the while learning strategies was 0.927. Both pilot studies revealed a high internal reliability of the instrument. The findings showed that the mean score of motivation (5.34) is higher than the mean score for the learning strategies (4.55). A multiple regresion test conducted on the hyphotesis showed that the two dimensions, namely motivation (β=0.21, T=4.15, p < 0.00) and learning strategies (β=-0.23, T=-4.65, p < 0.00) were significant predictors of Self-Regulated Learning. There was no significant difference between students of different demographic background on SRL as a whole, motivation (p > 0.05, p > 0.05) however a significant difference was shown in the learning strategies (p=0.01 < 0.05). There was a significant difference between different genders in SRL. This difference was seen in motivation (p < 0.05, p < 0.05) but not in the learning strategies (p=0.07 > 0.05). There is a significant difference between the different races (Malays, Chinese and Indians) on both motivation and learning strategies (p < 0.05). A significant difference was also shown between high and low income groups (p=0.01 < 0.05). The qualitative analysis suggests that there are SRL characteristics in the process of teaching such as goal setting, motivation and the overall teaching method. Data from students’ interviews showed that students were active practitioners of SRL, having characteristics such as making extrinsic goal orientation, control of learning, doing rehearsals, involved in peer learning and ability to seek help. However there are other aspects of SRL that was neglected. The implication of this findings can help students, teachers, student teacher and family to understand the SRL strategies that could come into play during teaching and learning. The impact of this study is to use SRL as a tool that can be practiced and integrated into the teaching and learning of science subjects in future. Furthemore, SRL strategies may help in enhancing students academic achievement disregarding their demographic profile and status. |
References |
Abd. Rahim Rashid. (1998). Kaedah dan metodologi yang berkesan pengajaran- pembelajaran sejarah. Kertas kerja kursus “Kursus guru-guru Sejarah“ MARA pada 20hb–24hb April. Bangunan Mara , Kuala Lumpur.
Ames, C. & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3):260-267.
Anderman, L. H. & Anderman, E.M. (1999). Social predictors of changes instudents’ achievement goal Orientation. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25, 21- 37.
Anderson, G., Benjamin, D. & Fuss, M. (1994). The Determinant Of Success In University, Introductory Economics Courses . Journal Of Economic Education. 25:99-120.
Akersson, V.L., Flick, L.B. & Lederman, N.G. (2000). The influence of primary children’s ideas in science on teaching practce. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 37(4): 363-385.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C. & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to Research in Education (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning.
Azizi Yahya & Jaafar Sidek Latif (2005). Membentuk Identiti Remaja. Pahang: PTS Publications & Distributions Sdn Bhd.
Azizi Yahya, Shahrin Hashim, Jamaluddin Rali, Yusuf Boon & Abd. Rahim Hamdan (2007) Mengusai Pendidikan dalam Penyelididkan;Teori, analisis & Interpretasi data. PTS Profesional Publishing Sdn. Bhd.
Baker, D. (2003). Equity issues in science education. In B. Fraser & K. Tobin (Eds.), International Handbook of Science Education. London: Kluwer Academic.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-eficancy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist 28 (2): 117-148.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self Efficacy: The Exercise of control. New York: Freeman
Baird, J.R. (1990). Metacognition, purposeful enquiry and conceptual change. Dlm. E. Hegarty-Hazel (Ed.). The Student Laboratory and the Science Curriculum. London, Routledge.
Baird, J.R. & Mitchell, I. J. (Ed.) (1986). Improving the quality of teaching and learning: An Australian case study - the PEEL project. Melbourne, Monash University Printery.
Ben-Zvi, R., Eylon, B. & Silberstein, J. (1998). Theories, principles and laws. Education in Chemistry. 5 : 89-92.
Biggs, J.B & Telfer (1987). Learning Process Questionnaire Manual. Melbourne :Australian Council for Educational Research.
Beyer, B. K. (1997). Improve student thinking: A comprehensive approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Brown, A. L. (1997). Metacognition, executive control, self regulation and other more mysterious mechanism. In Weinert, F. E. & Kluwe, R. H.(Eds) Metacognition, motivation and understanding. 65-116. Hillsdale, New Jersey:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Butler, D. L., Novak Lauscher, H., Jarvis-Selinger, S. & Beckingham, B. (2004) Collaboration and self-regulation in teachers’ professional development, Teaching and Teacher Education 20, pp. 435- 455.
Carver, C. S. & Scheier, M. F. (2000). On the structure of behavioral self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self- regulation (pp. 41–84). New York: Academic Press.
Chang, K.E., Sung, Y.T, & Chen, I.D. (2002). The Effect of Concept mapping to text comprehension and summarization. Jounal of Experimental Education, 71(1). 5-23.
Chamot, A. U. & O'Malley, J. M. (1992). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. Dlm. P. A. Richard-Amato dan M. A. Snow (Ed.), The multicultural classroom: Readings for content-area teachers. White Plains: Longman.
Champagne, A.B., Gunstone, R.F. & Klopfer, L.E. (1985). Cognitive research and the design of science instruction. Educational Psychologist. 17(5): 31-53.
Christine C.M. G & Zhang Donglan (2002). A Metacognitive Framework for Reflective Journals. In: Agnes Chang S.C. & Christine C.M. Goh eds. Teachers’ Handbook on Teaching Generic Thinking Skills. Singapore: Prentice Hall. 8 – 21.
Claudia Gama. (2000). The Role of Metacognition in Interactive Learning Environments. Kertas kerja dibentangkan ITS'2000 Conference - Young Researchers' Track, Montreal, California, June 2000.
Claudia Gama, C. (2001). Metacognition and reflection in ITS: increasing awareness to improve learning. Dlm. J. D. Moore. (Ed.). Artificial Intelligence in Education. IOS Press: Brazil.
Grigss, S. A. (1985). Conselling students through their individual learning styles. The National Institute of Education, The University Of Michigans
Chyung, S. Y. (1996). The effects of conceptual tempo and computer-assisted instructional environment on college students’s self-regulated learning and acedamic achievement. Dissertation abstract. Texas Tech University.
Claxton, C. S. (1990). Fostering student learning and development through effective teaching. In Robert M. Hashway(Ed.), Handbook of Developmental Education.
Corno, L. (1996). The Metasognitive Control Compenents of Self-Regulated Learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 11, 333-346
Corno, L., & Mardinach (1983). The Role of Cognitive Engagement in Classroom Learning and Motivation. Educational Psychology, 18, 88-108.
Corno, L. (2001). The metacognitive control components of self regulated learning. Contemparory Education Psychology, 11, 333-346
Covington, M.V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology 51: 171-200.
Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Marison, K. (2003). Research Methods in Education (5?? edition) diperolehi pada 12 Januari 2009 daripada http://books.google.com/books?id=tD8lP40zoHoC&pg=PA103&lpg=PA103 &dq=purposive+sampling+in+education+research&source=bl&ots=FsS9xH4 uaV&sig=qTXuoYvA4JVUcd6w8XsWjUg05C0&hl=en&ei=RIyPSqfILpiVk AWAodW7Cg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3
Crow, L.D & Crow, A. (1983). Educational Pyshocology. New York. American Book Company. Dalam Marzuki Ngah (2002). Hubungan Antara Konsep Kendiri Akademik,Konsep Kendiri Bukan Akademik Dan Motivasi Pencapaian Terhadap Pencapaian Sains. Diperoleh Oktober 20, 2008 daripada http://mpkt.edu.my/penyelidikan/marzuki02
Creswell, J. W. (2003a). Advanced mixed method research designs. Handbook on mixed methods in the behavioral and social sciences. Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications, 209-240.
Creswell, J. W. (2003b). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating litative research. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Daniel, G. E. (2003). Effects of Cofnitive Strategy in Instruction on Mathematical Problem Solving of Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities.Disertation abstract Ohio State University.
D'Avanzo, C. (2003). Application of research on learning to college teaching: ecological examples. Bioscience 53: 1221-28.
David, J. N. & Debra, M-D., (2006). A Formative assessment and self regulated learning: A Model and seven priciples of good feedback practice. Diterbitkan dalam Studies in Higher Education (2006), Vol. 31(2), 199-218 diperoleh pada 11 Ogos 2009 daripada http://tltt.strath.ac.uk/REAP/public/Resources/DN_SHE_Final.pdf
Davidson, J.E., Deuser, R. & Sternberg, R.J. (1996). The Role of Metacognition in Problem Solving. In: Metcalfe, J. & Shimamura, A.P. eds. Metacognition:Knowing about Knowing. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Duncan, T. G. & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The Making of Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire . Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128.
Fraenkel, J.R. (1996). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill.
Flavell, J.H. (1976). Metacognive aspects of problem solving. In Resnick, L. B. Eds. The nature of Intelligence, 231-235. Hilldale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Fatin Aliah Phang Abdullah. (2005). Hubungan dan Peranan Kemahiran Metakognitif Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Fizik Dikalangan Pelajar Sains Tingkatan Empat. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Tesis Sarjana (tidak diterbitkan)
Gardner, H. (2000). Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century. New York: Basic.
Gay, L.R., Mills, G. E. & Airasian, P. (2009) .Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. Upper Saddle Rier &Columbus : Pearson Merill Prentice Hall.
Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. (8th edition). NJ: Pearson.
Gage, N. L. & Berliner, D. C. (1988). Educational Psychology. 4th. ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company. 170 – 201.
Gaskill, P. J., & Murphy, P. K. (2004). Effects on a memory strategy on second- graders’ performance and self efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29(1), 27-49.
Georghiades, P. (2000). Beyond Conceptual Change Learning in Science Education: Focusing on Transfer, Durability and Metacognition. Educational Research. 42(2): 119 – 139.
Gunstone, R. & Northfield, J. (1992). Labour Law and State School Teachers: The VICTorian Experience Australian Schools & the Law. Dlm. Jane Edwards, Andrew Knott & Dan (Ed). Teaching in School. London: Law Book Company Limited
Gunstone, R.F. (1995). The importance of specific science content in the enhancemen of metacognition. Dlm. P.J. Fensham, R.F. Gunstone dan R.T. White (Ed.). The content of science : a constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: The Falmer Press.
Habibollah Naderi , Rohani Abdullah, Tengku Aizan Hamid & Jamaluddin Sharir (2008). Intelligence and Gender as Predictors of Academic Achievement Among Undergraduate Students. European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 7, Number 2 (2008).diperoleh pada 2 november 2009 daripada http://www.eurojournals.com/ejss_7_2_17.pdf
Hadwin, A.F., Winne, P.H., Stockley, D.B., Nesbit, J.C. & Woszczyna, C. (2001). Context Moderates Students’Self Report about How they Study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, (477-485)
Heidrun Stoger & Albert Ziegler. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary classroom self regulated learning program for gifted mathematic underachievers. International Education Journal, 6(2), 261–271.
Holloway, J. H. (2003). Addressing the needs of homeless Students. Educational Leadership 60(4):89-91.
Hwang, Y., & Levin, J. R., (2002). Examination of Middle School Students’ Independent use of a Complex Mnemonic System. Journal of Experimental Education, 71(1). 25-38.
Hwang, Young Suk, & Konstantinos Vrongistinos. (2002). Elementary inservice teachers’ self-regulated learning strategies related to their academic achievements. Journal of Instructional Psychology 29 (3): 147-54.
Janssen, D. A. (2006). The Ultimate Self Challenge: Time Management. Diperoleh pada 25 Jun 2009 daripada http://www.danieljanssen.com/ArchiveArticles/timemanagement.shtml
James Kuo, Chris Hagie & Michael T Miller. (2003). Encouraging College Student Success. International Education Journal, 14, 60–67.
Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory-of-mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 32, 70–78.
Jegede, O. J., Alaiyemola, F. F., & Okebukola, P. A. O. (1990). The effect of concept mapping on students' anxiety and achievement in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 951-960.
Johari Surif & Mohammad Yusof Arshad (2004). Strategi Metakognitif dalam Pembelajaran Sains: Suatu Perspektif Baru. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 10: 1 – 16.
Jonassen, D.H., Carr, C. & Yueh, H.P. (1998). Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking. Tech Trends. 43(2): 24-32
Johnson, A. P. (2005). A Short Guide to Action Research. 2nd ed. Boston:Pearson
Jones, L., Jordan, K. & Stillings, N. (2001). Molecular visualization in science education:report from the molecular visualization in science education workshop, diperoleh pada 5.10.2009 daripada http://Pro3.Chem.Pitt.Edu/Workshop/Workshop_Report_180701.Pdf.
Kahle, J. B., & Meece, J. (1994). Research on gender issues in the classroom. In D. Gabel (Eds.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp.13-39).
Kasper, L. F. (1996). Assessing the Metacognitive Growth of ESL Student Writers. TESL-EJ Vol. 3 No. 1 November 1997.
Keefe, J.W. (1988). Learning Style: Cognitive and thinking skills. Reston, VA: National Association of secondary School Principles.
Keffe, J. (1987). Learning styles theory and practice. Reston: National Association of Secondary Scholls Principals.
Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2000). Perangkaan Pendidikan Malaysia 2000. KL: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.
Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2004). Projek Sekolah Bestari. Diperoleh Oktober 20, 2008 daripada http://www.moe.edu.my
Kopper. (2002). Ko-kaunselor Pemimpin Pelajar. Yayasan Nurul Yakin: diperoleh pada 10 Jun 2008 daripada Portal Pendidikan Utusan. (http://www.tutor.com.my/tutor/kopper/index.asp?i=7)
Lee, L.H. (1997). Goal orientation, goal setting, and achievement performance in college students: An integrated model of achievement motivation in school settings.Doctoral Dissertation, University of Southern California. Dissertation Abstracts International 59 (06A) : 1905.
Lee, K.W.L. (2002). A reflection on an in-service course for chemistry teachers in Singapore. Dlm. T.A. Girl, K.W.L. Lee, N.K. Goh dan L.S. Chia. New paradigms for science education. A perspective of teaching problem solving, creative teaching and primary science education. Singapura: Prentice Hall.
Lee, K.W.L. & Fensham, P.J. (1996). A general strategy for solving high school electrochemistry problems. International Journal of Science Education. 18(5): 543-555.
Luke, I. & Hardy, C.A. (1999). Appreciating the complexity of learning in physical education: the utilization of a metacognitive ability conceptual framework. Sport, Education and Society. 4(2): 175-191.
Levinson, D.J. (1981). “Exploration In Biography: Evolution Of The Individual Life Structure in Adulthood.” New York: John Wiley.
Long, H. B. (1990). Understanding Adult Leaners. Dalam M. W. Galbraith, Adult Learning Methods: A Guide fo effective Instruction. Malabar, Florida: Robert E. Krieger Publishing Company.
Loughran, J.J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education. 53 (1), 33-43.
Maria, T. C. R. & Pedro, F. C. A. (2004). Gender differences in academic motivation of secondary school students published in Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2(1) 97-112 ISSN:1696-2095 (2004) diperoleh pada 23 Jun 2008 daripada http://www.investigacion psicopedagogica.org/revista/articulos/3/english/ Art_3_31.pdf
Mayer, (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction. 13(1). 125- 139.
Martin M.O, Mullis,V.S, Gonzalez, E.J & Chrostowski, S. J.(2004). TIMSS 2003 International Science Report. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education: Boston College
McCall, G. J., & J. L. Simmons (eds.). lssues in Participant Observation: A Text and Reader (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1969). Diambil pada November 2008 di http://pod.nku.edu/pdfs/doug/geoSurvey.pdf
Meece, J. L. & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 582-590.
Miles, . B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage
Meister, C & Rosenshine, B.. (1992). Scaffolds for teaching higher-order cognitive strategies. In A.C. Ornstein (Ed.) Teaching: Theory into Practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Mohamad Johdi Salleh. (2003) Interaksi Guru-Pelajar di Bilik Darjah dan Prestasi Cemerlang Penilaian Menengah Rendah (PMR). 2 - 4 September 2003. International Seminar on Learning and Motivation. Organizer: School of Cognitive Sciences and Education, UUM. Venue: Copthorne Hotel, Batu Ferringhi, Penang
Mohd Zaaba & Zuraidah Hj. Ismail (2004) dalam Abdul Sukor Shaari,Yahya Don dan Yaakob Daud (2005). Motivasi Belajar Dan Harga Diri:Hubungan Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Dan Kegiatan Kokurikulum Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Fakulti Sains Kognitif Dan Pendidikan Universiti Utara Malaysia. Diperoleh Oktober 20, 2008 daripada http://www.psb1.uum.edu.my/tesis/Penyelidikan%20Print/2005/DR.%20ABD .%20SUKOR%20SHAARI,%20YAHYA%20DON%20DAN%20YAAKOB %20DAUD.pdf
Mohd Ruzi (2000). Konsep Sekolah Bestari. Diperolehi pada 15 febuari 2009 daripada http://www.mohdruzi.com/Konsep%20Sekolah%20Bestari.htm
Mohammad Yusof Arshad, Johari Surif, Tan Soo Yin, Dalina Daud & Uthayakumari a/p Ibrahim@Sellakutty. (2002). Kefahaman pelajar mengenai konsep zarah: Perbandingan respon pelajar di Malaysia dan pelajar di United Kingdom. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. 8(1): 21-38.
Ng Lee Yen, Kamariah Abu Bakar, Samsilah Roslan, Wong Su Lan & Petri Zabariah Megat Abd. Rahman (2005). Predictors of Self-Regulated learning in Malaysian Smart School. International Education Journal. 2005.6(3), 343- 353.
Ng Wai Kong (1998). Psychological Measurement for Malaysian School Children. Unit Kajian Penyelidikan Asas. Sekolah Pendidikan. Universiti sains Malaysia
Nisbet, J. (1991). Methods and Approaches. In: Maclure, S. & Davies, P. eds. Learning to Think: Thinking to Learn: The Proceedings of the 1989 OECD Conference Organized by the Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Oxford: Pergamon Press. 177 – 185.
Nor Hashimah Jalaludin (2004). Penguasaan Bahasa Melayu oleh Pelajar Melayu dalam Arus Globalisasi dlm Jurnal Bahasa Jld 4 Bil. 1 Mac 2004. DBP.diperolehi pada 12 Ogos 2009 daripada http://www.eurojournals.com/ejss_7_2_09.pdf
Osborn , R.J. & Wittrock, M.C. (1983). Learning science : A generative process. Science Education. 67(4) : 489-504
Osborne, R.J., Bell, B.F & Gilbert, J. (1983). Children’s science and its consequences for teaching. Science Education. 66(4): 623-633.
Osman Mohamed & Hannafin (1992). Metacognitive Research and Theory: Analysis and Implications for Instructional Design. Educational Technology Research and Development. 40(2): 83 – 99.
Paris, S. G., Byrnes, J. P. & Paris, A. H. (2001). Contructing theroies, identities and action of self-regulated learners. Dalam B. J. Zimmerman & D.H. Schunck (Eds) Self-Regulated Learning & Academic achievement: Theoritical Perspective (pp 253-287) Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting metacognition and motivation of exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education, 11(6), 7-15.
Phillips, D. & Zimmerman, M. (1990). The developmental course of perceived competence and incompetence among competent children. Dalam R.J. Sternberg & J. Kolligian, eds., Competence Considered (pp. 41–66). New Haven, CT: YaleUniversity Press.
Pintrich, P.R & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1): 33-40.
Pintrich, P. R. (Ed) (1995). Understanding Self-Regulated Learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning. No 63. Jossey-Bass In.
Pitrinch, P.R., Smith, D. A., Gracia, T., & MacKeachie, W.J. (1991). A Manual for the use of Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MLSQ). Technical Report No. 91-B-004. The Regents of The University of Michigan.
Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A., Garcia, T. & Mc Keachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaires (MSLQ). Educational & Psychological Measurement 53 (3): 801-813.
Pintrich, P.R.,(2000). Educational Psychology at the Millennium. A look back and a look foward. Educational Psychology 35, 221-226
Pintrich, P.R. & Schunk, D.H. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
Pintrich, P. R., dan Zusho, A. (2002). The Development of Academic self regulation: The Role of Cognitive and motivational factors. Dalam . Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp.249-284) San Diego, CA: Academic.
Pencapaian Sanis dan Matematik dalam Bahasa Inggeris: Bandar dan Luar Bandar (2005, 5 April). Utusan Malaysia, ms 8
Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (1990). What we really know about strategy instruction. Education Leadership, 48, 31-34.
Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum (2001). Draf Huraian Sukatan Pelajaran Fizik : KBSM Tingkatan Empat. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia : Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum.
Rashidi Azizan & Abdul Razak Habib (1998). Pengajaran dalam bilik darjah: Kaedah dan strategi. Kajang: Masa Enterprise.
Reber, A. S. (1985). Dictionary of Psychology. New Zealand: Penguin Books. Rickey, D & Stacy, A.M. (2000). The Role of Metacognition in Learning Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 77(7): 915 – 920.
Rop, C.J. (1999). Student Perspectives on Success in High School Chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 36(2): 221 – 237.
Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organization Behavior: Concept, Controvercies applications. New Zealand: Penguin Books.
Rohani Abdullah. (2001). Perkembangan kanak-kanak. Penilaian secara portfolio. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia.
Sadiah Baharom, Sharifah Norhaidah Syed Idros & Nordin Abd. Razak (2003). Self- regulatory cognitive and metacognitive learning starategies of preuniversity students: Issues and Challenges. Dalam kertas kerja yang dibentangkan di International Seminar on Learning and Motivation: Issues and Challenges in a Borderless World. (13-15 Oktober 2003, Copthorne Hotel, Penang)
Sadiah Baharom, Ong Eng Tek, Marzita Putih, Sopia Mat Yasin., Nurul Huda Abd. Rahman & Muhamad Ikhwan Mat Saad, (2009). The Validation and adaptation of MSLQ aimed to assess student use of self regulated learning. Paper presented at 1?? International Conference on Educational Research and Practice Enhancing Human Capital through Teacher Education Faculty of Educational Studies UPM 10-11 June 2009
Saemah Rahman & John Arul Phillips (2006) Tentang efikasi kendiri. Diperoleh pada 17 ogos 2006 daripada http://pkukmweb.ukm.my/~jurfpend/journal/vol%2031%202006/full%20articl e%2031%202006/artikel%2031_2.pdf
Samsilah Roslan,Abd. Majid Isa, Othman Mohamad & Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi (2006). Hubungan Orientasi Matlamat dengan Penggunaan Strategi Pembelajaran Aturan Kendiri. Diperoleh pada Januari 03, 2009 daripada http://myais.fsktm.um.edu.my/5297/1/7.pdf
Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting General Metacognitive Awareness. Instructional Science. 26(1-2 ): 113 – 125.
Schraw, G., Horn, C, Thorndike-Christ, T & Bruning, R. (1995). Academic goal orientation and student achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology 20:359-368.
Schunk, D. H. (1996). Learning Theories. New Jersey: Prantice Hall
Schunk, D. H. & Zimmerman, B. J. (2003). Self Regulated and Learning. Dalam W.M. Reynolds dan G. E. Millers (Eds) Handbook of psychology, Vol 7:Educational psychology, Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Schurter, W.A. (2002). “Comprehension Monitoring: An Aid To Mathematical Problem Solving”. Journal Of Development Education. 26(2).22-32.
Smith, E. (2003). ‘Failing boys and moral panics: perspectives on the underachievement debate’, British Journal of Educational Studies, 51, 3, 282-95.
Sperling, R. A., Howard, B. C., Miller, L. A., & Murphy, C. (2002). Measures of children’s knowledge and regulation of cognition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 51-79.
Shu Ya Zhang & Angela I. C. (1995). Chinese Parents’ Influence on Academic Performance. Diperolehi pada 7 Nov 2009 daripada http://www.ncbe.gwe.edu.
Shulman, L. S., (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1-22.
Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306-314.
Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research : A Practical Handbook. London, Thousand Oaks. New Delhi: Sage.
Sheridan, J. C & Lyndall, G. S. (2003). SPSS Analysis without Anguish. Version 11.0 for windows. John Wiley & Sons Ausrtalia, Ltd.
Schraeder, L.L. (1997). The Effectiveness of Color Coding on Middle School Students’ Ability to Differentiate Explicit from Implication Information in Narrative and Expository Texts. ERIC: Ed422737
Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.). (2000). Handbook of intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Computer-Assisted Research Design and Analysis. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Tan, O. S. (2004). Enhancing thinking through problem based learning approaches: International perspectives. Singapore: Thomson.
Thomas, R. & Hoper, E. (1991). Simulations : An opportunity we are missing. Journal of Reseach on Computing in Education. 23(3): 497-512
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods (2nd ed.) New York: Wiley.
TIMSS (2007). International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the fourth and eighth grades. Boston College: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education.
Unit Perancang Ekonomi (2001). Rangka Rancangan Jangka Panjang Ketiga 2001- 2010. Kuala Lumpur. Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Berhad.
Van Zile-Tamsen, C.V. (1998). Examining metacognitive self-regulation within the Context of daily academic tasks. Doctoral Dissertation, The State University of New York,1998. Dissertation Abstracts International 44 (11A): 3320
Wan Shazmimi Wan Mustapha (2004). Langkah Mengekalkan Minat dan Membangkitkan Motivasi Pelajar oleh Guru-Guru sains Peringkat Menengah Atas. Projek Ijazah Sarjana Muda Sains dan pendidikan (Biologi) yang tidak diterbitkan. Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
Wan Noorazah Wan Md. Nawi. 2004. Strategi pembelajaran Biologi pelajar Melayu dan bukan Melayu di UKM: Satu tinjauan. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.
Weinstein, C. E., Ridlay, D. S & Weber, E. S. (1989). Helping students develop strategies for effective learning. Educational Leadership 46(4).
Weinstein, C. E., & Mayer., R. E. (1986). The teaching of learning strategies. In M. C.Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3?? ed.)(pp. 315-327). New York: Mac Millan.
Weiner, B. (1992). A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology 71 (1): 3-25.
Weiner, B. (1985) An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion, Psychological Review 92: 548-73.
Winne, P. (1993), "State-of-the-art instructional computing systems that afford instruction and bootstrap research", in Jones, M., Winne, P.H. (Eds),Adaptive Learning Environments, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, Vol. F85.
Wlodkoswki, R. J., & Jaynes, J.H. (1990). Eager to learn. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Woolnaugh, B. E. (1994). Factors afecting students’ choice of science and engineering. International Journal of Science Education 19(6): 659-676.
Wolters, A. (1999). The relationship between high school students’ motivational regulation and their use of Learning strategies, effort and classroom performance. Learning and individual differences, 11 (3), 218-299.
Woolfolk, A. (1995). Educational psychology (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon (648 pp.).
Yayasan Strategi Sosial (2005). Masyarakat India di Malaysia. Isu dan Masalah RMK 8;Cadangan RMK 9. diperolehi pada 5 Nov 2009, daripada http://www.digitalibrary.my/dmdocuments/malaysiakini/665_First%20Submis sion.pdf
Yesim Somuncuoglu Ali Yildrim. (2001). Relationship between achievement goal orientation and use of learning strategies. Journal of Education Research, 92, 267–276.
Yin, RK. (1984) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage Publications, California, pp.90-91.
Yoong Soon & Aminah Ayob (2005). Students Interest in Leaving Science & Technologies (S&T) Topics, Their Attitudes, Perceptions & Priorities towards Important S&T Issues. School of Educational Studies. University Sains Malaysia.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). Models of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Dalam B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 1- 25). New York: Springer-Verlag.
Zimmerman, B. J. (1997). Becomming a self regulated learner writer : A Social cognitive perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology. 22, 73-101.
Zimmerman, B.J., & Schunck, D.H. (2001). Self-Regulated Learning & Academic Achievement : Thoeritical Perspectives (2?? ed.) Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Elbaum. Associates Publisher.
Zimmerman, B.J. (2000a). Attaining self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In M.Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich & M. Zeidner (Eds) Handbook of Self- Regulation (pp 451-502) San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Zimmerman, B.J. (2000b). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice.(page14). Diperoleh Ogos 29, 2008 daripada http://www.findarticles.com/p/atricles/mi_mONQM/is_2_41/ai_90190493/pg
Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Achieveing Academic Excellence. A self-Regulatory perspective. En. M. Ferrari (Ed). The pursuit of excellence through education (pp 85-110). Mahuah. NJ:Erlbaum.
Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Sociocultural influence and students’ development of academic self-regulation. A social cognitive perspective. In D. M. McInerney, & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning: Big theories revisited (Vol. 4, pp.139-164). United States of America. Diperolehi pada 18 Januari 2009 daripada http://www.emis.de/proceedings/PME30/4/137.pdf
Zuraidi Wahid (2008). Kesan Penggunaan Modul Pembelajaran Regulasi Kendiri Terhadap Motivasi dan Pencapaian Pelajar bagi Tajuk Fotosintesis Biologi Tingkatan 4. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan, Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |