|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Background: Organizational ambidexterity is an emerging concept and it permeates too many functional domains in the discussion of organizational performance. The importance of understanding this concept motivates researchers to explore organizational ambidexterity as internal and external capabilities in the context of supply chain. Despite its importance in building oriented capabilities to organizations, little information is known about organizational ambidexterity in supply chain context. The objective of this review is to produce a comprehensive mapping of themes related to organizational ambidexterity studies in supply chain research, particularly in improving firm performance. Method: A scoping review of the literature was conducted using Web of Science (WoS), Scopus and EconBiz databases to identify what is the nature of published scientific literature on this topic and what are the emerging themes of organizational ambidexterity in relation to supply chain studies. Result: This study found three main themes and eleven sub-themes in relation to inter-organization ambidexterity in the supply chain context. The main themes include learning process, outcome and leadership. The review indicates that most of the studies are conducted in understanding learning process. Conclusion: The management of supply chain has a positive association with organizational ambidexterity. Supply chain operations involve selection, development, and implementation of new process(es) or technology (exploitation)-the outcome of a prior search procedure (exploration), which has been described as a sequential approach to exploration and exploitation and both processes are important especially in a dynamic environment. The findings from this scoping review indicate the importance of developing and managing a supply chain that supports exploration and exploitation practices. Therefore, managers should understand that maximizing a firm's current skills is critical to profitability and market share. While continuous refinement of existing knowledge is important, it is the generation and application of new knowledge that leads to increased value (profitability) and competitive advantage. Organizational ambidexterity within supply chain management provides significant benefits to big firms in improving their long-term efficiency. This offers avenue for future research to compare the effect of organizational ambidexterity in small firm. ? Wy?sza Szko?a Logistyki, Pozna?, Polska. |
| References |
Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., & Levine, D. I. (1999). Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the toyota production system. Organization Science, 10(1), 43-68. doi:10.1287/orsc.10.1.43 Andriopoulos, C., & Lewis, M. W. (2009). Exploitation-exploration tensions and organizational ambidexterity: Managing paradoxes of innovation. Organization Science, 20(4), 696-717. doi:10.1287/orsc.1080.0406 Aoki, K., & Wilhelm, M. (2017). The role of ambidexterity in managing buyer-supplier relationships: The toyota case. Organization Science, 28(6), 1080-1097. doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1156 Ardito, L., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., Dezi, L., & Castellano, S. (2020). The influence of inbound open innovation on ambidexterity performance: Does it pay to source knowledge from supply chain stakeholders? Journal of Business Research, 119, 321-329. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.12.043 Arend, R. J., & Wisner, J. D. (2005). Small business and supply chain management: Is there a fit? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(3), 403-436. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.11.003 Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 19-32. doi:10.1080/1364557032000119616 Aslam, H., Blome, C., Roscoe, S., & Azhar, T. M. (2018). Dynamic supply chain capabilities: How market sensing, supply chain agility and adaptability affect supply chain ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(12), 2266-2285. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-09-2017-0555 Aslam, H., Khan, A. Q., Rashid, K., & Rehman, S. -. (2020). Achieving supply chain resilience: The role of supply chain ambidexterity and supply chain agility. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 31(6), 1185-1204. doi:10.1108/JMTM-07-2019-0263 Aziz, N. A. A., Hanafiah, M. H., & Latif, M. N. A. (2020). Supply chain management in franchising literature review: Synthesis of conclusions. [Zarządzanie łańcuchem dostaw we franczyzie – przegląd literatury] Logforum, 16(4), 521-534. doi:10.17270/J.LOG.2020.513 Baum, J. A. C., Calabrese, T., & Silverman, B. S. (2000). Dont go it alone: Alliance network composition and startups' performance in canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 267-294. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200003)21:3<267::AID-SMJ89>3.0.CO;2-8 Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Benner, M. J., & Tushman, M. L. (2003). Exploitation, exploration, and process management: The productivity dilemma revisited. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 238-256. doi:10.5465/AMR.2003.9416096 Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2004). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 45(4), 47-55. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Cheng, J. -., & Lu, K. -. (2017). Enhancing effects of supply chain resilience: Insights from trajectory and resource-based perspectives. Supply Chain Management, 22(4), 329-340. doi:10.1108/SCM-06-2016-0190 Clermont, M., & Dyckhoff, H. (2012). Coverage of business administration literature in google scholar: Analysis and comparison with EconBiz, scopus and web of science. Bibliometrie – Praxis Und Forschung, 1(5), 1-54. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Davis, K., Drey, N., & Gould, D. (2009). What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(10), 1386-1400. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.010 Gu, M., Yang, L., & Huo, B. (2021). The impact of information technology usage on supply chain resilience and performance: An ambidexterous view. International Journal of Production Economics, 232 doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107956 Gualandris, J., Legenvre, H., & Kalchschmidt, M. (2018). Exploration and exploitation within supply networks: Examining purchasing ambidexterity and its multiple performance implications. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(3), 667-689. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-03-2017-0162 Gupta, A. K., Smith, K. G., & Shalley, C. E. (2006). The interplay between exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal, 49(4), 693-706. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.22083026 He, Z. -., & Wong, P. -. (2004). Exploration vs. exploitation: An empirical test of the ambidexterity hypothesis. Organization Science, 15(4), 481-495. doi:10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 Hodgkinson, G. P., & Ford, J. K. (2014). Narrative, meta-analytic, and systematic reviews: What are the differences and why do they matter? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(SUPPL.1), S1-S5. doi:10.1002/job.1918 Huang, Y. -., & Lu, L. -. (2020). The differentiated and ambidextrous influence of network flexibility on exploratory and exploitative partnership formations. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 50(6), 577-599. doi:10.1108/IJPDLM-02-2019-0057 Im, G., & Rai, A. (2008). Knowledge sharing ambidexterity in long-term interorganizational relationships. Management Science, 54(7), 1281-1296. doi:10.1287/mnsc.1080.0902 Im, G., Rai, A., & Lambert, L. S. (2019). Governance and resource-sharing ambidexterity for generating relationship benefits in supply chain collaborations*. Decision Sciences, 50(4), 656-693. doi:10.1111/deci.12353 Jermsittiparsert, K., & Pithuk, L. (2019). Exploring the nexus between supply chain ambidexterity, supply chain agility, supply chain adaptability and the marketing sensing of manufacturing firms in indonesia. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 555-562. doi:10.18510/hssr.2019.7266 Kraus, S., Breier, M., & Dasí-Rodríguez, S. (2020). The art of crafting a systematic literature review in entrepreneurship research. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 16(3), 1023-1042. doi:10.1007/s11365-020-00635-4 Kristal, M. M., Huang, X., & Roth, A. V. (2010). The effect of an ambidextrous supply chain strategy on combinative competitive capabilities and business performance. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 415-429. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2009.12.002 Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5(1) doi:10.1186/1748-5908-5-69 Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14(2 S), 95-112. doi:10.1002/smj.4250141009 Luu, T. (2017). Market responsiveness: Antecedents and the moderating role of external supply chain integration. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 32(1), 30-45. doi:10.1108/JBIM-07-2015-0133 March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87. Retrieved from www.scopus.com McGrath, R. G. (2001). Exploratory learning, innovative capacity, and managerial oversight. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 118-131. doi:10.2307/3069340 McNamara, P., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1998). Lessons from the celltech case: Balancing knowledge exploration and exploitation in organizational renewal. British Journal of Management, 9(4), 291-307. Retrieved from www.scopus.com Mehdi, M., & Ahmed, S. (2019). Exploration factors affecting an ambidextrous supply chain. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, 32(2), 195-219. doi:10.1504/IJLSM.2019.097584 Moher, D., Shamseer, L., Clarke, M., Ghersi, D., Liberati, A., Petticrew, M., . . . Whitlock, E. (2015). Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Systematic Reviews, 4(1) doi:10.1186/2046-4053-4-1 Ojha, D., Acharya, C., & Cooper, D. (2018). Transformational leadership and supply chain ambidexterity: Mediating role of supply chain organizational learning and moderating role of uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 197, 215-231. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.01.001 Ojha, D., Struckell, E., Acharya, C., & Patel, P. C. (2018). Supply chain organizational learning, exploration, exploitation, and firm performance: A creation-dispersion perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 70-82. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.07.025 O'Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002 O'Reilly Iii, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Organizational ambidexterity: Past, present, and future. Academy of Management Perspectives, 27(4), 324-338. doi:10.5465/amp.2013.0025 Partanen, J., Kohtamäki, M., Patel, P. C., & Parida, V. (2020). Supply chain ambidexterity and manufacturing SME performance: The moderating roles of network capability and strategic information flow. International Journal of Production Economics, 221 doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.08.005 Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., Molina-Azorín, J. F., Tarí, J. J., Pereira-Moliner, J., & López-Gamero, M. D. (2020). The microfoundations of organizational ambidexterity: A systematic review of individual ambidexterity through a multilevel framework. BRQ Business Research Quarterly, 24(4), 355-371. doi:10.1177/2340944420929711 Petrosino, A., Boruch, R. F., Soydan, H., Duggan, L., & Sanchez-Meca, J. (2001). Meeting the challenges of evidence-based policy: The campbell collaboration. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578(1), 14-34. doi:10.1177/000271620157800102 Pham, M. T., Rajić, A., Greig, J. D., Sargeant, J. M., Papadopoulos, A., & Mcewen, S. A. (2014). A scoping review of scoping reviews: Advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(4), 371-385. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1123 Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145. doi:10.2307/2393988 Pu, X., Wang, Z., & Chan, F. T. S. (2020). Leveraging open E-logistic standards to achieve ambidexterity in supply chain. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 60(4), 347-358. doi:10.1080/08874417.2018.1488543 Puranam, P., Singh, H., & Zollo, M. (2006). Organizing for innovation: Managing the coordination-autonomy dilemma in technology acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 263-280. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2006.20786062 Rojo Gallego Burin, A., Perez-Arostegui, M. N., & Llorens-Montes, J. (2020). Ambidexterity and IT competence can improve supply chain flexibility? A resource orchestration approach. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 26(2) doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2020.100610 Rojo, A., Llorens-Montes, J., & Perez-Arostegui, M. N. (2016). The impact of ambidexterity on supply chain flexibility fit. Supply Chain Management, 21(4), 433-452. doi:10.1108/SCM-08-2015-0328 Rojo-Gallego-Burin, A., Llorens-Montes, F. J., Perez-Arostegui, M. N., & Stevenson, M. (2020). Ambidextrous supply chain strategy and supply chain flexibility: The contingent effect of ISO 9001. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 120(9), 1691-1714. doi:10.1108/IMDS-01-2020-0038 Roldán Bravo, M. I., Ruiz-Moreno, A., & Lloréns Montes, F. J. (2018). Examining desorptive capacity in supply chains: The role of organizational ambidexterity. International Journal of Operations and Production Management, 38(2), 534-553. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-12-2016-0751 Sánchez, A. D., de la Cruz Del Río Rama,M., & García, J. Á. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of publications on wine tourism in the databases scopus and WoS. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 23(1), 8-15. doi:10.1016/j.iedeen.2016.02.001 Shukor, A. A. A., Newaz, M. S., Rahman, M. K., & Taha, A. Z. (2020). Supply chain integration and its impact on supply chain agility and organizational flexibility in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Emerging Markets, doi:10.1108/IJOEM-04-2020-0418 Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., Veiga, J. F., & Souder, D. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity's conceptualizations, antecedents, and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864-894. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00841.x Song, M., & Di Benedetto, C. A. (2008). Supplier's involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. Journal of Operations Management, 26(1), 1-22. doi:10.1016/j.jom.2007.06.001 Tuan, L. T. (2016). Organisational ambidexterity and supply chain agility: The mediating role of external knowledge sharing and moderating role of competitive intelligence. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 19(6), 583-603. doi:10.1080/13675567.2015.1137278 Tushman, M. L., & O'Reilly III, C. A. (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review, (4), 8-30. doi:10.2307/41165852 Wamba, S. F., Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Akter, S. (2020). The performance effects of big data analytics and supply chain ambidexterity: The moderating effect of environmental dynamism. International Journal of Production Economics, 222 doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.019 Wei, S., Ke, W., Liu, H., & Wei, K. K. (2020). Supply chain information integration and firm performance: Are explorative and exploitative IT capabilities complementary or substitutive? Decision Sciences, 51(3), 464-499. doi:10.1111/deci.12364 Zakrzewska-Bielawska, A. (2021). Ambidextrous Strategy: Antecedents, Strategic Choices, and Performance, Retrieved from www.scopus.com |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |