|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| This study aimed to determine the level of ability of Form One students in the topic of algebraic expressions based on the six levels in the Bloom's Taxonomy Revision. In addition, this study aimed to identify the types of errors of form one students in the topic of algebraic expressions based on Newman's Error Analysis. Respondents of this study consist of 68 form one students were selected from school in Melaka through simple random sampling method. The data in this study has been analysed in a descriptive basis involving frequency, percentages and mean. This study uses the application of [[CHECK_SINGLEQUOT_ENT]] Statistical Package of Social Science (SPSS) version 26 for the purpose of this analysis. The findings showed that the students have troubled in the topic of algebra. 3 of 6 levels in the Bloom's Taxanomy cannot be responded well by these students. Students only show high levels of mastery in the first two levels of remembering and understanding levels. Students have the most significant problems at evaluating level with the lowest percentage. The findings of this study also showed that most of students make an error in transformation. This study showed that error reading is lowest. In conclusion, these students have a problem answering the question of algebra and the type of common mistakes that are transformational problems. The implications of this study are, the Ministry and the teachers are able to makes reference to the difficult levels and the types of errors often made by form one students in the topic of algebra. ? Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd. |
| References |
Rittle-Johnson, B., and Star, J. R. 2007. Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 561-574. Latipah, S. 2000. Satu Tinjauan Tentang Kefahaman Konsep Ungkapan Algebra Pelajar Tingkatan Dua Dan Pola Kesilapan Yang Dilakukan. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Johor, Malaysia: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Dahlan, R. 2000. Analisis Kesilapan yang Dilakukan oleh Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Berkaitan Ungkapan Algebra. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana Muda. Egodawatte G. 2011 Secondary School Student’s Misconceptions in Algebra, Department of Curriculum, Teaching and Learning, University of Toronto. Thesis PhD. Mathematics, Texas A&M University, 1-12. Tajudin, N.M. 2015 Mathematical Knowledge And Higher Order Thinking Skills For Teaching Algebraic Problem Solving. Proceedings of SOCIOINT15- 2nd International Conference on Education, Social Sciences and Humanities, 8-10 June 2015- Istanbul, Turkey, ms. 26- 35, ISBN: 978-605-64453-3-0. Sangit, Z. 2007. Kesilapan dalam Ungkapan Algebra di Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan 4 : Satu kajian kes. Master Thesis. Retrieved from http://pustaka2.upsi.edu.my/eprints/159/1/Kesilapan dalam ungkapan algebra di kalangan pelajar tingkatan 4.pd. Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An overview. Theory into practice, 41 (4), 212-218. Parakitipong and Nakamura. 2006. Analysis of Mathematics Performance of Grade Five Students in Thailand Using Newman Procedure. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 9 (1), 111 – 122, CICE Hiroshima University. Karnasih, I. 2015. Analisis Kesalahan Newman pada Soal Cerita Matematis. Jurnal PARADIKMA, 8(1), 37-51. Retrieved from http://digilib.unimed.ac.id/public/UNIMEDArticle-37596-Ida%20Karnasih_Newmans%20Error%20Analysis.pdf. Oktaviana, D. 2017. Analisis tipe kesalahan berdasarkan teori newman dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada mata kuliah matematika diskrit. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 5(2): 26. Hashim, T. S. H. T., and Ahmad, M. A. S. 2016. Analisis kesalahan newman dalam penyelesaian masalah matematik tahun 3. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 6(2), 69-84. Oktaviana, D. 2018. Analisis tipe kesalahan berdasarkan teori newman dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita pada mata kuliah matematika diskrit. Edu Sains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 5(2), 22-32. |
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |