UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :QC Physics
Main Author :Norfaridatul Akmar Hasim
Title :Pembangunan PhyKER Games bagi tajuk litar elektrik sekolah menengah dan kesannya ke atas motivasi dan pencapaian
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains dan Matematik
Year of Publication :2021
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan permainan yang dinamai PhyKER Games bagi tajuk Litar Elektrik untuk pelajar sekolah menengah dan menguji kesan penggunaannya dalam pembelajaran ke atas pencapaian dan motivasi pelajar. Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk Kajian Perekaan dan Pembangunan (DDR) termasuk kuasi eksperimen bagi menentukan kesan penggunaan permainan tersebut. Fasa pertama kajian iaitu analisis keperluan melibatkan keseluruhan populasi 504 pelajar di sekolah Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya. Seramai 384 pelajar Tingkatan 5 memberi respon yang mana 66.9% pelajar menyatakan tajuk Elektrik adalah tajuk yang paling sukar manakala kaedah pembelajaran berasaskan permainan menjadi pilihan 62.2% pelajar. Fasa kedua kajian iaitu reka bentuk dan pembangunan PhyKER Games melibatkan seramai tiga orang pakar bagi mendapatkan kesahan kandungan. Dapatan menunjukkan PhyKER Games mempunyai kesahan kandungan yang memuaskan dengan nilai Indeks Kesahan Kandungan 0.95. Bagi menguji kebolehgunaan dan kebolehlaksanaan PhyKER Games instrumen yang digunakan ialah soal selidik yang diadaptasi daripada instrumen sedia ada. Dapatan menunjukkan PhyKER Games mempunyai kebolehlaksanaan dan kebolehgunaan yang baik dengan peratus persetujuan antara pengguna melebihi 75%. Bahagian terakhir kajian ialah fasa penilaian kesan penggunaan PhyKER Games. Dapatan menunjukkan bahawa terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan antara pencapaian skor pelajar dalam kumpulan rawatan (n=30, M = 66.58, SD = 11.587) melalui ujian-t sampel bebas dengan nilai t (58) = - 5.960, p = 0.000, dengan pelajar dalam kumpulan kawalan (n=30, M = 50.92, SD = 8.547). Analisis korelasi Pearson dengan nilai r=0.82 menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang kuat dan signifikan antara motivasi menggunakan PhyKER Games dengan skor pencapaian pascaujian. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini berjaya membangunkan sebuah permainan pendidikan dalam tajuk Litar Elektrik yang berkesan dalam meningkatkan pencapaian dan motivasi pelajar. Implikasinya, PhyKER Games boleh dijadikan sebagai rujukan kepada guru sebagai contoh permainan yang berkesan dan oleh itu boleh dimanfaatkan dalam pembelajaran berasaskan permainan. Selain itu, PhyKER Games boleh menjadi panduan bagi penyelidik dan guru bagi membangunkan permainan serupa bagi tujuan pengajaran dan pembelajaran.

References

Adams, E., & Dormans, J. (2012). Game Mechanics: Advanced Game Design. Berkeley CA:

Pearson Education. Retrieved from http://www.amazon.com/Game-Mechanics-

Advanced-Design-Voices/dp/0321820

 

Agus Budiyono, Moh. Afiful Hair, Arin Wildani, dan Firdausiyah. (2020). Pengaruh learning

cycle 5e berbantuan permainan monopoli fisika berpoin (mokain) terhadap

penguasaan konsep peserta didik SMA. EduSains: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains &

Matematika, Vol.8 No.2 (pp 22-31)

 

Aiko Sato, Jonathan de Haan. (2016). Applying an Experiential Learning Model to the

Teaching of Gateway Strategy Board Games. International Journal of Instruction;

Vol.9, No.1 e-ISSN: 1308-1470. www.e-iji.net p-ISSN: 1694-609X.

 

Akademi Sains Malaysia (2015). Penilaian perlaksanaan projek rintis Pendidikan sains

berasaskan amalan inkuiri di empat buah sekolah rendah di Daerah Ulu Langat.

Perpustakaan Negara Malaysia.

 

Akbari, R, & Yazdanmehr, E. (2014). A Critical Analysis of the Selection Criteria of expert

Teachers in ELT. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, Vol. 4, No. 8, pp, 1653-

1658.

 

Alberta Education. (2007). Diploma Examinations Program: View Results by Table Retrieved

from: Alberta Education web site:

http://www.education.alberta.ca/media/735785/table.pdf

 

All, A., Nuñez Castellar, P. E., & Looy, J. Van. (2014). Measuring Effectiveness in Digital

Game-Based Learning: A Methodological Review. International Journal of Serious

Games, 1(2), 3–21.

 

Anderson, C.A. & Dill, K.E. (2004). Video games and aggressive thoughts, feelings and

behavior in the laboratory and in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,

Vol.78, No.4, pp.772-790.

 

Andika, W. D., Akbar, M., Yufiarti, Sumarni, S. (2019). Playing board games with

mathematical self-concept to support early numeracy skill of 5-6 years old children.

Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1166, 12019. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-

6596/1166/1/012019 Google Scholar

 

Anshel, M. H. (2003). Sport psychology: From theory to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Pearson Education.

 

Apostol, S., Zaharescu, L., & Aleze, I. (2013). Gamification of learning and educational

games. eLearning & Software for Education, 2, pp.67.

 

Ary, D., Jacobs, L.C., & Razavieh, A. (2002). Introduction to research in education. Belmont,

CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.

 

Australian Commications and Media Authority. (2013). Report 3-Smartphones and tablets.

Canberra.

 

Awan, R.U.N., Noureen, G. & Naz, A. (2011). A study of relationship between achievement motivation, 

self-concept and achievement in English and Mathematics at secondary level. International Education 

Studies 4(3): 72-79.

 

Azizi Yahaya, Gooh, M.L., Halimah Ma’alip (2014). Pengaruh media berunsur agresif dan kesannya 

terhadap tingkah laku pelajar di sekolah menengah. National Action Research Conference 2014, 

Official Conference Proceeding, Melaka, 25-26 Jun 2014.

 

Bandura, A. 1994. Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior,4. New 

York: Academic Press, pp. 71-81.

 

Banfield, J., & Wilkerson, B. (2014). Increasing student intrinsic motivation and self-efficacy 

through gamification pedagogy. Contemporary Issues in Education Research CIER, 7(4), pp.291.

 

Baser, M. (2006). Promoting Conceptual Change through Active Learning Using Open Source Software 

for Physics Simulations. Australasian Journal of Educational

 

Berliner, C. David. (2001). Expert Teachers: Their characteristics, development and 

accomplishments, Ponencies De La Teoria A L’aula, 13-28.

 

Bernard, L. C., & Krupat, E. (1994). Health Psychology: Biopsychosocial Factors in Health and 

Illness. New York: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

 

Bilal E, Erol M. (2009). Investigating Students’ Conceptions of Some Electricity Concepts.

Lat. Am. J. Phys. Educ. 3 (2). pp.193-201.

 

Blamire, R. (2010). Digital Games for Learning: Conclusions and recommendations from the IMAGINE 

project. European Schoolnet. Lifelong Learning Program.

 

Boopathiraj, C. (2013). Analysis of Test Items on Difficulty Level and Discrimination Index in the 

Test for Research in Education. International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary 

Research, 2(2), 189–193.

 

Boyle, S. (2011). An Introduction to Games based learning. UCD Teaching and Learning Resources. 

https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1215.Do-it-yourself

 

Campbell, D.T. & Stanley, J.C. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for

Research. Chicago: Rand Mçnally College Publishing Company.

 

Cardinot, A., Fairfield, J. A. (2019). Game-based learning to engage students with Physics

and Astronomy using a board game. International Journal of Game-Based Learning

(IJGBL), 9(1), 42–57. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGBL.2019010104

 

Chazbeck, B. & Ayoubi, Z. (2018). Resources used by Lebanese secondary physics teachers'

for teaching electricity: Types, objectives and factors affecting their selection. Journal

of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 4(2), (p.118-128).

 

Choi, E., & Park, J. (2003). Conditions for the Effective Use of Simulation and Its

Application to Middle-School Physics Inquiry Activities, 42(3), 318–324.

 

Christiane, Giselle, Raul, Giani, Fernando, M. Nathalie, Jean. (2018). SplashCode-A Board

Game for Learning an Understanding of Algorithms in Middle School. Journal

Informatics in Education, 2019, Vol. 18, No. 2, (p.259–280). Vilnius University.

 

Chua Yan Piaw. (2006). Kaedah dan Stitistik Penyelidikan. Buku 1. Asas Statistik

Penyelidikan. Mc Graw Hill. Kuala Lumpur.

 

Chu H.C. & Hwang G.J. (2008). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with

the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications 2008 ; 34 : 28 26-

40.

 

Clark, R.C. & Mayer, R.E. (2008). Learning by Viewing Versus Learning by Doing:Evidence-

Based Guidelines for principled Learning Environments. Performance Improvement.

47, 5-13.

 

College Station (2001). ADDIE instructional design model. Texas Copyright 2001 © LOT

All rights reserved. L:\htms\training\handouts\pf_files\addie.doc. Published on

01/23/01.

 

Cox, R. H. (2007). Sport psychology: Concepts and applications. New York, NY: McGraw-

Hill.

 

Creswell, J.W. (2008). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating

Quantitative and Qualitative Research. Edisi ke-3. NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research. Educational Research (Vol.4). Boston: Pearson.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

 

David Devries & Keith Edwards. (1974). Teams-Games-Tournament: A research review.

Journal of Research and Development in Education 1978122838.

 

DeVries D L, Mescon IT, Shackman SL. (1975). Teams-Games-Tournament in Elementary

Classroom: A Replication (Tech.Rep.No.190). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University,

Center for Social Organization of Schools.

 

Donovan T. (2017). It’s all a game: The history of board games from Monopoly to Settlers of

Catan. Thomas Dunne Books.

 

Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013).

Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions

from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public

Interest, Supplement, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/152910061245326

 

Dady Mukti Prabowo. (2018). Development of 3dimensional Diorama in The Natural Science

Learning Especially Lesson of Ekosistem for Grade V Students. Elem. Sch. Teach., Vol.

2, No. 2.

 

Dziob, D. (2020). Board Game in Physics Classes-a Proposal for a New Method of Student

Assessment. Res Sci Educ 50, 845–862. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9714-y

 

Elesar V Malicoban, Judylee F Bulado, Anton A Soriano, Aireen Babe L Monte, Ivy Claire V

Mordeno. (2019). Development of a STEM board game electriciladders for grade 8

students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2nd International Annual Meeting on

STEM education (I AM STEM).

 

Ellwood M. (2018). Wall Street’s latest secretive trend? Board game nights: This fraternitylike

network of players is more Snakes & Ladders than Skull & Bones—but no less

well positioned. Bloomberg.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-04-26/wall-street-s-latest-trend-innetworking-

board-game-nights

 

Engerhardt PV, Beichner RJ. (2004). Students’ Understanding of Direct Current Resistive

Electrical Circuits. Am. J. Phys. 72 (1) pp.98-115.

 

Eun-Seok Cha, K. H. (2007). Translation of scales in cross-cultural research:issues and

techniques. Jan Research Methodology, 386-395.

 

Fatin Aliah Pang, Mohd Salleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali & Salmiza Salleh. (2012). Faktor

penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran Sains: Satu analisis

sorotan tesis. Dibentangkan diSeminar Majlis Dekan Pendidikan IPTA 2012, 7 - 9

October 2012, TheZon Regency, Johor Bahru, Johor. Dimuat turun pada 2 Februari

2014 dari http://eprints.utm.my/28550.

 

Foster, A. N., & Koehler, M. J. (1997). Game-Based Learning of Physics Content The

Effectiveness of a Physics Game for Learning Basic Physics Concepts.

 

Fraenkel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in ducation. New

York: McGraw-Hill.

 

Gagne, R. M. (1985). The Conditions of Learning. 4th. Ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and

Winston.

 

Gagné, R.M. 1968. Learning hierarchies. Educational Psychologist 6: 1–9.

 

Gagné, R.M. 2000. Learning hierarchies. Dlm. Richey, R. (pnyt.). The legacy of Robert

 

Gagné, pp. 63-84. Syracuse: ERIC Clearinghouse on Instructional Technology.

 

Gagné, R.M., Briggs, L.J. & Wager, W.W. 1992. Principles of Instructional Design. Edisi ke-

4. New York: Harcourt Brace.

 

Gagné, R.M., Wager, W.W., Golas, K.C. & Keller, J.M. (2005). Principles of Instructional

Design. Edisi ke-5. USA: Thomson Wadsworth.

 

Garris, R., Ahlers, R., & Driskell, J. E. (2002). Games, Motivation, and Learning: A Research

and Practice Model. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 441–467.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878102238607

 

Gay,L.R. dan Airasian. (2006). Educational Research. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.

 

Granic, I., Lobel, A., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2014). The benefits of playing video games. The

American Psychologist, 69(1), 66–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034857

 

Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2007). What is instructional design? Dalam Reiser, R. A.,

& Dempsey, J. V. (Editor), Trends and issues in intructional design and technology,

(ms. 10-16). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

 

Efe. (2017). The effects of using diorama on 7th grade students’ academic achievement and

science learning skills. Asia-Pacific Forum Sci. Learn. Teach., Vol. 18, no. 1.

 

Halim, L., Yong, T.K. & Meerah. (2014). Overcoming Student’s Misconceptions on Forces in

Equilibrium: An action Research Study. Creative Education, 5, 1032-1042.

 

Handhika J, Cari, Suparmi, Sunarno W. (2015). External Representation to Overcome

Misconception in Physics. International Conference on Mathematics, Science, and

Education. pp 34-37.

 

Hanus, M., & Fox, J. (2015). Assessing the effects of gamification in the classroom: A

longitudinal study on intrinsic motivation, social comparison, satisfaction, effort, and

academic performance. Computers & Education, 80, 152–161.

 

Hartley, J. & Davies, I.K. 1976. Preinstructional strategies: The role of pretest, behavioral

objectives, overview and advance organizers. Review of Educational Research 46: 239-

265.

 

Hays, R. T. (2005). The Effectiveness of instructional Games: A Literature Review and

Disscussion. Orlando.

 

Henderson, D. (2005). Games: Making Learning Fun. Annual Review of Nursing Education, 3.

pp. 165-183.

 

Horsley, T. L. (2010). Education Theory and Classroom Games: Increasing Knowledge and

Fun in the Classroom. The Journal of Nursing Education, 49(6). pp.363-364.

 

Hoy, B. (2018). Teaching history with custom-built board games. Simulation & Gaming,

49(2), 115–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878118763624

 

Hussain NH, Latiff LA, Yahaya N. (2012). Alternative Conception about Open and short

Circuit Concept. Procedia – Social and Behavior Science.

 

Institut Aminuddin Baki. (2017). Panduan Perlaksanaan Pendidikan Abad ke 21. Kementerian

Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Jaakkola, T., & Nurmi, S. (2008). Fostering elementary school students’ understanding of

simple electricity by combining simulation and laboratory activities. Journal

ofComputer Assisted Learning, 24(4), 271–283.

 

Jackson, S.L. (2003). Research Methods and Statistics: A Critical Thinking Approach. USA:

Thomson Wadsworth.

 

Jamalludin, H., Baharuddin, A., & Zaidatun, T. (2001). Pembangunan Perisian Multimedia

Satu Pendekatan Sistematik . Kuala Lumpur: Venton Publishing.

 

Jen-Che Tsai, Shih-Yeh Chen, Chun-Yen Chang and Shiang-Yao Liu. (2020). Element

Enterprise Tycoon: Playing Board Games to Learn Chemistry in Daily Life. Education

Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102).

 

Joseph, F. H., G Tomas, M. H., Christian, M. R., & Marko, S. (2014). A Primer on Partial

Least Square Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.

 

Julio Cesar Queiroz de Cavalho, Leila Maria Beltramini & Nelma Regina Segnini

Bossolan (2019). Using a board game to teach protein synthesis to high school

students. Journal of Biological Education, 53:2, 205-206

DOI: 10.1080/00219266.2018.1469532

 

Kapp, K.M. (2012). The Gamification of Learning and Instruction. Game-Based Method and

Strategies for Training and Education. San Francisco:Pfeiffer

 

Kelly Damron. (2019). Using Board Games to Engage Non interested Students In Accounting

Classes. Journal of Instructional Research. Vol. 8, No 2, (p.93-96). Grand Canyon

University.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013). Modul Kursus Peningkatan Profesionalisme Guru

Sains, Pedagogi sains Abad 21.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Laporan Tahunan 2016 PPPM 2013-2025. Pelan

Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2015, 1, 100–108.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Buku Penerangan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah

Menengah (KSSM). Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum, Putrajaya.

 

Kerby., M.C., MacDonald, A., McDonald, J., Baguley, M. (2017). The museum diorama:

Caught between art and history, Australian Art Education, Vol. 38, No. 2, (p.261-274).

 

Kerlinger, F. N. (1979). Foundations of behavioral research. Ed. ke-2. New York: Holt

Rinehart & Winston.

 

Khairul Hasni A.K, Norazah Mohd Nordin & AMP, Zanaton Iksan. (2015). Analisa keperluan

awal pembangunan modul sains (e-SMART) berasaskan pendekatan konstruktif 5E dan

analogi terhadap penerapan kemahiran berfikir kreatif murid. Persidangan Seminar

Kebangsaan Pendidikan Negara Siri (SKepen).

 

Khairun, N. M. A. (2007). Kesan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Inkuiri (PBI) Melalui Web

Terhadap Prestasi dan Persepsi Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Fizik Peringkat

Universiti. Pulau Pinang: Universiti Sains Malaysia

 

Kim, J., Park, S., Lee, H., & Lee, H. (2005). Correcting Misconception Using Unrealistic

Virtual Reality Simulation in Physics Education. Recent Research Development in

Learning Technologies, 1–5.

 

Koba S, Mitchell TC. (2011). Hard-to-Teach Science Concepts: A Framework to Support

Learners, Grades 3–5. NSTA PRESS, 2011, pp. 5-6

 

Kocukozer H, Kocakulah S. (2008a) Secondary School Students’ Misconceptionn about

Simple Electric Circuits. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 4 (1). pp. 101-115

 

Kocukozer H, Kocakulah S. (2008b) Effect of simple Circuits Teaching on Conceptual

Change in Grade Physics Course. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 5 (1). pp. 59-

74

 

Krejcie, R.V. & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.

Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30 (3) 607-610.

 

Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A practical guide to instructional

design. Oxon: Routledge.

 

Lazarro, N. (2004). Why we play games: Four keys to more emotion without story. Retrieved

January 20, 2014, from http://xeodesign.com/xeodesign_whyweplaygames.pdf

 

Lazarus, R.S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Guilford.

 

Lee, T.T. & Kamisah Osman. 2010b. Pembinaan Modul Multimedia Interaktif dengan Agen

Pedagogi (IMMPA) dalam Pembelajaran Elektrokimia: Analisis Keperluan. Prosiding

Kolokium Kebangsaan Pasca Siswazah Sains & Matematik 2010. (p. 25).

 

Lund, A.M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire, STC Usability SIG

Newsletter, 8(2).

 

Lyn.M.R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research,

35(6).

 

Makki, M.H., Abd-El-Khalick, F. & Boujaoude, S. (2003). Lebanese Secondary school

student environmental knowledge and attitude. Environmental Education Research,

9(1), 21-33.

 

McCowan, R. J., & McCowan, S. C. (1999). Item Analysis for Criterion-Referenced Tests.

Online Submission. Retrieved from

http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED501716.

 

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting educational design research. New York:

Routledge.

 

McKillip, J. (1987). Need Analysis: Tools for the Human Service and Education. Applied

Social Research Methods Series, Volume 10. Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks, CA.

 

Mehrens, W. A., & Lehmann, I. J. (1991). Measurement and Evaluation in Education and

Psychology (4th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.

 

Mohamad, A.R., dan Nurhafiza M. (2011). Persepsi Pelajar-Pelajar Institut Kemahiran Mara

(IKM) Terhadap Proses Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran Program Sijil Teknologi

Elektrik Domestik Dan Industri Yang Sedang Mereka Ikuti. Journal of Technical,

Vocational & Engineering Education. 2 (2011), 50-63.

 

Mohd Majid Konting (2005). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan

Bahasa & Pustaka.

 

Mohd. Majid Konting. (2009). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan (cetakan ke-8). Kuala

Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka (Cetakan asal diterbitkan pada 1990).

 

Mohd Nor Izwan Sulaiman. (2008). Teori, strategi dan perkaedahan dalam pendidikan.

http://mohdnorizwansulaiman.blogspot.com/2008/10/teori-strategi dan-perkaedahandalam.

html [2 Oktober 2009]

 

Morgan, W. P. (1972). Hypnosis and muscular performance. In W. P. Morgan (ed.),

Ergogenic aids and muscular performance. pp. 193-233. New York, NY: Academic

Press.

 

Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing Effective Instruction (5th ed.).

United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

 

Nadia Ayub. (2010). Effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on academic performance.

Pakistan Business Review 363-372.

http://www.iobm.edu.pk/PBR/PBR_1007_363_The%20Effect%20of%20Inrin

sic%20and%20Extrinsic%20Motivation%20revise.pdf [27 Mac 2012

 

Nadrah, Ismail Tolla, Muhammad Sidin Ali & Muris. (2017). The Effect of Cooperative

Learning Model of Teams Games Tournament (TGT) and Students’ Motivation toward

Physics Learning Outcome. International Education Studies; Vol. 10, No. 2, (p.123-

130). ISSN 1913-9020 E-ISSN 1913-9039.

 

Nazli Yahya (2002). Development and Evaluation of Web-Based Learning Systems for Re-

Conceptualization: Basic Electric Circuit. Unpublished Dissertation, PhD. University

Teknologi Malaysia.

 

Needham, R. 1987. CLIS in the Classroom: Teaching Strategies for Developing Understanding

in Science. Leeds: University of Leeds.

 

Nitko, A. J. (2004). Educational Assessment of Students (4th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson/Merill

Prentice Hall.

 

Noraini. (2013). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Mc Graw Hill. Kuala Lumpur.

 

Norfaridatul Akmar Hasim (2019). Pendekatan Permainan Media Diorama Dalam

Meningkatkan Pencapaian Dan Minat Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Fizik Tingkatan

Lima. Seminar Amalan Terbaik IBSE Peringkat Negeri Wilayah Persekutuan

Putrajaya.12 Oktober 2019, Kuala Lumpur.

 

Norfaridatul A.H, Mustamam & Nurulhuda. (2019a). DDR (Design and Development

Research): Tajuk yang Sukar dan Kaedah yang Paling Digemari Dalam Mata Pelajaran

Fizik. In eProsiding Penulisan Ilmiah dan inovasi PAK21 Pendidik Malaysia (2019)

(p.206-209). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. {eISBN 978-967-17774-0-4}.

 

Norfaridatul A.H, Mustamam & Nurulhuda. (2019b). PhyKER Games: Effect On Student’

Motivations. In eProsiding Penulisan Ilmiah dan inovasi PAK21 Pendidik Malaysia

(2019) (p.204-205). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. {eISBN 978-967-17774-0-4}.

 

Norfaridatul Akmar, Mustamam & Nurul Huda (2020). Aids in physics: Design And

Development. Momentum: Physics Education Journal 4 (2), 2020, (p. 57-63).

Indonesia. {ISSN: ISSN 2548-9135 (online), ISSN 2548-9127 (print) I doi:10.21067}

http://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/momentum/article/view/4432/2654

 

Norfaridatul Akmar Bt Hasim. (2020). Kesan Permainan Pendidikan Pembelajaran

Elektrik Terhadap Murid Sekolah Menengah. JurnalPPenyelididkan Pendidikan guru.

Volume 16 (2020), 15-23. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

https://www.moe.gov.my/menumedia/media-cetak/penerbitan/jurnal/3872- jurnalpenyelidikan-

guru-jilid-16-2020/file

 

Norfaridatul Akmar, Mustamam & Nurul Huda (2017). The Effectiveness of PhyKER Games

on Students’ Achievement in Electric. In Proceeding 5nd International Postgraduate

Conference on Science and Mathematics 2014 (IPCSM’17) and International

Conference on Science, Technology, Engineering And Mathematics 2017

(ICSTEM’2017). 7-9 October 2017, UPSI Tanjung Malim, Malaysia.

 

Norfaridatul Akmar, Mustamam & Nurul Huda (2015). Pembangunan Dan Penilaian

Pembelajaran Berasaskan Permainan Bagi Tajuk Litar Arus Terus. In Proceeding

National Research Seminar 2015 (p. 571-577). 9 May 2015, UPSI, Tanjung Malim,

Malaysia.

 

Nuri Korganch, Cristina Miron, Adrian Dafinei, Stefan Antohe. (2015). The Importance of

Inquiry-Based Learning on Electric Circuit Models for Conceptual Understanding.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 pp.2463 – 2468.

 

O’Dwyer A. (2009). Prior Understanding of Basic Electrical Circuit Concept by First Year

Engineering Students. All-Ireland Society for Higher Education (AISHE) Conference,

NUI Maynooth.

 

Overmars, M. (2005). Learning object-oriented design by creating games. Potentials, IEEE,

23(5), 11-13.

 

Pallant, J. (2005). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS

for Window (Version 12). Edisi ke-3. NSW: Allen & Unwin.

 

Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide to Data Analysis Using

SPSS Program (6th ed.). London, UK: McGraw-Hill Education.

 

Parker, J.C. (2007). Gender differences in the motivation to learn. Tesis Sarjana, The Evergreen

State College.

 

Peranti, Andik Purwanto & Eko Risdianto. (2019). Pengembangan media pembelajaran

permainan mofin (monopoli fisika sains) pada siswa SMA kelas x. Jurnal Kumparan

Fisika Vol. 2 No. 1 (pp. 41-48).

 

Pivec, M., Dziabenko, O., & Schinnerl, I. (2003). Aspect of Game-Based Learning. In

Proceeding of I-KNOW. Graz, Austria.

 

Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s

being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing and Health,

29(5), 489–497. http://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147.

 

Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1– 6.

https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816.

 

Prensky, M. (2007). Digital games-based learning. New York: Paragon House

Purwanto & Anisa, J. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Teams Games

Tournament (TGT) Menggunakan Media Monopoli Terhadap Hasil Belajar Fisika

Siswa Pada Materi Fluida Statis. Jurnal Ikatan Alumni Fisika Universitas Negeri

Medan, 2(2).

 

Purwanto, M., Sari, I. M., & Husna, H. N. (2012). Implementasi Permainan Monopoli Fisika

Sebagai Media Pembelajaran dalam Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe TGT untuk

Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar dan Mengetahui Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis

Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 17(1), pp.

69. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v17i1.241

 

Qureshi, E. 2003. Instructional design models.

http://home.comcast.net/~elenaqureshi/IDModels.htm (24 September 2009).

 

Rahmayani & Sahyar (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Teams Game

Tournament (TGT) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Pengetahuan Konseptual Fisika Siswa.

Jurnal Pendidikan FisikaVol.7,No1 (p.55-60) http://jurnal.unimed.55

ac.id/2012/index.php/jpf.

 

Ramlah Jantan & Mahani Razali. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan Pendekatan Kontemporari.

Edisi Revisi. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill (M) Sdn. Bhd.

 

Rebecca Yvonne Bayeck. (2020). Examining Board Gameplay and Learning: A

Multidisciplinary Review of Recent Research. Simulation & Gaming, Sage Journals

2020. Vol. 51, No 4, 2020 (p. 411-431). https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878119901286

 

Richie, R.C., & Klein, J.D. (2007). Design and Development Research. New Jersey:

Lawrence Erlbumm Associates, inc.

 

Rizwan Akram Rana & Nasir Mahmood. (2010). The relationship between test anxiety and

academic achievement. Bulletin of Education and Research 32(2): 63-74.

 

Ruhaizah Binti Abdullah. (2015). The use of simulations and games in teaching and learning

introductory physics: An overview. Tesis Master of Edu. University Pendidikan Sultan

Idris

 

Ryan, M.M. & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and

new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology 25: 54-67.

 

Saedah Siraj, Norlidah Alias, Dorothy DeWitt & Zaharah Hussin. (2013). Design and

Development Research: Emergent Trend in Educational Research. Kuala Lumpur:

Pearson Malaysia Sdn Bhd.

 

Şahin, K. & Ahmet, E. (2009). Predicting college students’ Mathematics anxiety by

motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning strategies. College Student Journal

43(2): 631-642.

 

Sahrir, M. S., Alias, N. A., Ismail, Z., & AMP; Osman. N. (2012). Employing design and

development research (DDR) approaches in the design and development of online

Arabic vocabulary learning games prototype. Turkish Online Journal of Educational

Technology, 11(2), 108–119.

 

Sahyar & Kurniati, F. (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif (TGT) Numbered

Heads Together (NHT) dengan Menggunakan Media Permainan Terhadap

Pengetahuan Konseptual Fisika Siswa SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2).

 

Saleh Ahmed Al Khatib. (2010). Meta-cognitive self-regulated learning and motivational

beliefs as predictors of college students’ performance. International Journal for

Research in Education (IJRE) 27: 57-72.

 

Sanchez-Franco, M. J., & Roldán, J. L. (2010). Expressive aesthetics to ease perceived

community support: Exploring personal innovativeness and routinised behaviour as

moderators in Tuenti. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(6), 14451457

 

Sarabando, C., Cravino, J. P., & Soares, A. A. (2014). Science Direct Contribution of a

computer simulation to students’ learning of the physics concepts of weight and mass.

Procedia Technology, 13, 112–121.

 

Sari, A. M., & Gunawan, I. (2018). Developing Physics Monopoly Game Learning Media for

Light and Optical Devices. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 7(1), 71–89.

https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v7i1.2564.

 

Schafer, W. (1996). Stress Management for Wellness. Orlando: Harcourt Brace.

Tunnicliffe & A. Scheersoi. (2015). Natural history dioramas: History, construction and

educational role. Nat. Hist. Dioramas Hist. Constr. Educ. Role. No. May (Pp. 1–289).

 

Selye, H. (1982). The nature of stress. Retrieved

from http://www.icnr.com/articles/thenatureofstress.html

 

Serevina, V. (2009). Positive Influence between Outbound Activity in Physics Learning with

Student Studying Motivation. Jakarta: State University of Jakarta.

 

Setyani ND, Cari, Suparmi, Handhika J. (2017) Student’s Concept Ability of Newton’s Law

Based on Verbal and Visual Test. International Journal of Science and Applied

Science: Conference Series, 1(2) pp. 162-169.

 

Shahril @ Charil Hj Marzuki. (2005). Amalan Pengajaran Guru yang Berkesan: Kajian di

Beberapa Sekolah Menengah di Malaysia. Retrieved from

www.ipbl.edu.my/BM/penyelidikan/seminarpapers/2005/shahrilUM.pdf

 

Shapiro, S. S., and Wilk, M. B. (1965), An analysis of variance test for normality (complete

samples), Biometrika 52, 591–611.

 

Sidek Mohd Noah, & Jamaluddin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan modul: bagaimana membina

modul latihan dan modul akademik.Serdang: Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Siti Nursaila (2017). Kesan permainan pendidikan terhadap pembelajaran hukum newton

pelajar sekolah menengah. Tesis Dr. Fal. Universiti Sains Malaysia.

 

Smidt, S. (2010). Playing to learn: The role of play in early years. New York: Routledge.

 

Sornkhatha, P., & Srisawasdi, N. (2014). Supporting Conceptual Development in Newton’s

Laws of Motion using an Interactive Computer-Simulated Laboratory Environment.

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 2010–2014.

 

Stephen B. Shanklin and Craig R.Ehlen. (2017). Extending The Use and Effectiveness of The

Monopoly Board Game as An In-Class Economic Simulation Introductory Financial

Accounting Course. American Journal of Business Education, 2017. Vol. 10, No. 2,

(p.75-80). Teennessee State University, USA.

 

Sternberg, JR and Sternberg, K. (2011). Cognitive Psychology, six edition. Cengage Learning,

Canada, Wadsworth, pp. 107-108.

 

Stewart. J. & Haswell.K. (2013). Assessing readiness to work in primary health care: the

content validity of a self-check tool for physiotherapists and other health

professionals. Journal of Primary Health Care 5(1) 70 – 73.

 

Sudjana, Nana dan Ahmad Rivai. (2013). Media Pengajaran. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo

 

Sundus, M. (2018). The Impact of Using Gadgets on Children. Journal of Depression and

Anxiety. 7(1). pp.1-3.

 

Sung, Y.T., Chang, K.E., &Lee, MD. (2008). Designing multimedia games for young children’s

taxonomic concept development. Computers and Education, 50 (3), 1037-1051.

 

Syifa Aulia Hakim dan Harlinda Syofyan (2017). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran

Kooperatif Tipe Teams Games Tournament (TGT) Terhadap Motivasi Belajar IPA Di

Kelas IV SDN Kelapa Dua 06 Pagi Jakarta Barat. International Journal of Elementary

Education. Vol.1 (4) pp. 249-263.

 

Tan, W. H. (2015). Gamifikasi Dalam Pendidikan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Permainan.

Tanjung Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Tan, W.H., Johnston-Wilder, S. & Neill, S. (2011). Game-based learning with dialogic

teaching approach: deep learning and the use of SporeTM in A-Level biology lessons.

In: Felicia, P., ed. Handbook of research on improving learning and motivation

through educational games: multidisciplinary approaches. Hershey: IGI Global, pp.

860-875.

 

Thaker, MN, Phadke, BN, Patel, PD. (2013). The Effects of Electrical Hazards. International

Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering. 3(9). 569-574.

 

Timmermann, D and Kautz, C. (2014). Investigating Student Learning of the Voltage and

Potential Concepts in Introductory Electrical Engineering. Frontiers in Education

Conference (FIE) Proceedings, Madrid, pp 1-4.

 

Ugur G, Dilber R, Senpolar Y, Duzgun B. (2012). The Effects Analogy on Students’

Understanding of Direct Current Circuits and Attitudes toward Physics Lessons.

European Journal of Educational Research. 1 (2).pp.2011-223.

 

Kustiawan. (2018). The Development of Diorama Learning Media Transportation Themes to

Develop Language Skill Children‘s Group B, Res. Educ. Media, Vol. 9, No. 2, (pp.

26–31).

 

Ummu Husna. (2015). Reka bentuk dan pebangunan perisian permainan pendidikan pecahan

serta kajian keberkesanannya. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. Universiti Sains Malaysia.

 

V Tinedi, Yohandri and Djamas. (2018). How games are designed to increase students’

motivation in learning Physics? A Literature Review. Materials Science and

Engineering 335. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/335/1/012065.

 

Wang, L.C., & Chen, M. P. (2010). The effect of game strategy and preference-matching on

flow experience and programming performance in game-based learning. Innovations

in Education and Teaching International, 47 (1), 39-52.

 

Wecker, M. (2016). The History and Future of the Once-Revolutionary Taxidermy Diorama.

Retrieved from https://www.smithsonianmag.com/science- nature/ode-oncerevolutionary-

taxidermy-display-180960707/ http://rgjmuseum.co.uk/our-story/theregiment/

 

Weinberg, R. S. & Gould, D. (1999). Foundations of sport and exercise psychology.

Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics

 

Whitelock, D., Taylor, J., O‘Shea, T., Scanlon, E., Clark, P., & O‘Malley, C. (1993).

Challenging models of elastic collisions with a computer simulation, 20 (I).

 

Wigfield, A., Battle, A., Keller, L.B. & Eccles, J.S. (2002). Sex differences in motivation, selfconcept,

career aspiration and career choice: Implications for cognitive development.

Dlm. Mc Gillicuddy - DeLisi, A.V. & De Lisi, R. (pnyt.).

 

Woo, J.-C. (2014). Digital Game-Based Learning Support Student Motivation, Cognitive

Success and Performance Outcomes. Educational Technology & Society, 17 (3), 291-

307.

 

Woolfolk, A.E. (1998). Educational Psychology. Edisi ke-3. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc.

 

Yaashinta. (2013). Penggunaan media diorama untuk peningkatan keterampilan menulis

karangan narasi pada siswa sekolah dasar. Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Surabaya:

Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

 

Yam San Chee. (2011). Learning as becoming through performance, play, and dialogue: A

model of game-based learning with the game Legends of khimia. Digital Culture &

Education.

http://www.digitalcultureandeducation.com/uncategorized/dce1044_chee_2011_html/

[12 November 2013]

 

Yuenyong, C., Vel Marie C. Palisbo, Arlyn S. Pusta, Jonell B. Razo, Sotero O. Malayao, Jr.,

Ellen J. Castro, Neal Alfie Y. Lasta (2016). Development of a Board Game in

Teaching Direct Current Circuits. Proceeding of the 4th International Conference of

Science Educators and Teachers (ISET), Khon Kaen, Thailand: Science Education

Association (Thailand) (SEAT).

 

Zain F.M. (2009). Kesan Maklum Balas yang Berbeza Oleh Agen Pedagogi Dalam Sistem

Pengurusan Pembelajaran (SPP) Terhadap Pencapaian Murid yang Berbeza Lokus

Kawalan. Master’s Thesis. Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang.

 

Zaleha, I., & Nurul Ashikin, S. (2010). Pembangunan Sistem Sokongan Pembelajaran Kendiri

Atas Talian (Transport). Pembangunan Sistem Sokongan pembelajaran Kendiri Atas

Talian (Transport), 1–5.

 

Zhu, Y. & Leung, F.K.S. 2011. Motivation and achievement: Is there an East Asian

model? International Journal of Science & Mathematics Education 9: 1189-1212.

 

Zulkifli Osman. (2013). Kebolehlaksanaan dan Kebolehgunaan Modul Pengajaran Bahasa

Berlandaskan Pendekatan Holistik. PENDETA: Journal of Malay Language, Education

and Literature, 4, 202-230.

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.