Usman Awang Resistance to the Malay Humanity Facts in Uda and Dara Theatre Script

Salman Alfarisi

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	PN2000 Dramatic representation. The Theater
ISSN :	2222-6990
Main Author :	Salman Alfarisi
Additional Authors :	Muhammad Fazli Taib Saearani Nuriadi
Title :	Usman Awang Resistance to the Malay Humanity Facts in Uda and Dara Theatre Script

Place of Production :	Tanjong Malim
Publisher :	Fakulti Muzik dan Seni Persembahan
Year of Publication :	2021
Corporate Name :	Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris

The Uda and Dara theatre script is based on the outcome of Usman Awang's observation on Malay society life, especially in the newly independent era. Since the beginning, they have taken the process to improve social development. The choices of language and determination of the characters used by Usman Awang reflect any ideas and strong critical thinking on Malay society, humanity facts that were colonized and defeated either by the real colonizers or the Malay elite themselves. Thus, it is believed that through Uda and Dara, Usman Awang fought for a social statement that was contrary to the noble values that were believed in, namely the Malays who developed social, cultural, economic, and political origins based on Islamic values. In accordance with the issue, this article focuses on the two problems. How Usman Awang's resistance to the Malay's social reality and how the Malay elite practised colonialization of fellow Malay's. The literary sociology approach and reading literary method was used to analyse Uda and Dara theatre scripts. This article shows that Usman Awang strongly criticizes the stratification or social status that only benefits the Malay elite. Through an unjust system of land tenure, the Malay elite maintained strong dominance over weaker societies. The main principal is Usman Awang was able to reveal the critical Malay's awareness to escape from the elites power who colonized them after independence from Western colonialists. Keywords: Resistance, Humanity Facts, Malay Society

References

Al-Maruf, A. I. & Nugrahani, F. (2017). Pengkajian Sastra Teori dan Aplikasi. Surakarta: C.V. Djiwa Amarta Press.

Amin, S., & Ishak, S. (1995). Selected Play by Usman Awang (translated). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Awang, U. (1976). Muzika Uda dan Dara. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka-Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia.

Damono, S. D. (1979). Sosiologi Sastra sebuah Pengantar Ringkas. Jakarta: Pusat Pembinaan dan Pengembangan Bahasa.

Darma, B. (2019). Pengantar Teori Sastra. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Djahwasi, H. R., & Saidon, Z. L. (2021). An Analysis of Artistic Form and Musical Perspective of Romantic Era Music. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 771–782.

Endraswara, S. (2013). Metodologi Penelitian Antropologi Sastra. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Ombak.

Faruk. (1994). Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Faruk. (2010). Pengantar Sosiologi Sastra dari Strukturalisme Genetik sampai Post-Modernisme. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Freud, S. (1947). Leonardo da Vinci: a Study in Psychosexuality. New York: Random House.

Goldmann, L. (1967). “The Sociology of Literature: Status and Problems of Method” in International Social Science Journal, published quarterly by UNESCO, Vol. XIX No. 4, 1967.

Goldmann, L. (1981). Method in Sociology of Literature. Oxford: Basil Balckwill Publisher.

Harjito. (2014). Hegemoni Gramsci dalam Sastra Indonesia: Student Hijo, Nasionalisme, dan Wacana. Semarang: UPGRIS Press.

Heryanto, A. (1985). Perdebatan Sastra Kontekstual. Jakarta: C.V. Rajawali Press.

Jaafar, S. (2005). Wajah: Biografi Penulis. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

Kamarudin, N. B., & Rashid, A. A. S. B. A. (2021). Feature Film Script Writing Quality Issues: KL Vampires Film (2019). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 11(11), 362–371.

Nurgiantoro, B. (2005). Teori Pengkajian Fiksi. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Pradopo, R. D. (2002). Kritik Sastra Indonesia Modern. Yogyakarta: Gama Media.

Rahman, A. H. A. (1981). Sejarah dan Pemikiran Islam. Selangor: Penerbitan Pena Sdn. Bhd.

Rajendran, M. (1993). Sejarah Islam. Petaling Jaya: IBS Buku.

Ratna, N. K. (2003). Paradigma Sosiologi Sastra. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Ratna, N. K. (2007). Estetika Sastra dan Budaya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Stokes, J. (2006). How to Do Media and Cultural Studies. (translated Santi Indra Astuti). Yogyakarta: Bentang.

Suharianto, S. (1982). Dasar-dasar Teori Sastra. Surakarta: Widya Putra.

Sujarwa. (2019). Model dan Paradigma Teori Sastra. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Sastera, Budaya, dan Komunikasi Universitas Ahmad Dahlan.

Sutejo & Kasnadi, H. (2016). Sosiologi Sastra Menguak Dimensionalitas Sosial dalam Sastra. Yogyakarta: Terakata.

Taum, Y. Y. (2018). Kajian Semiotika Godlob Danarto dalam Perspektif Teeuw. Yogyakarta: SDU Press.

Teew, A. (1988). Sastra dan Ilmu Sastra Pengantar Teori Sastra (cet. kedua). Jakarta: Pustaka Jaya-Girimukti Pasaka.

Winner, E. (1982). Invented World: the Psychology of the Arts. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Mengenali Usman Awang. (2008). Utusan Malaysia. P. 28.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page