UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan Modul Pembelajaran Kendiri Pengamiran (Integration Self Learning-InSeL) bagi pelajar matrikulasi. Pembangunan modul ini berdasarkan Teori Pembelajaran Kognitif, pembinaan konsep Pengamiran, kemahiran berfikir dan pembelajaran kendiri. Modul dibangunkan menggunakan Model Sidek yang melibatkan dua peringkat iaitu membina draf modul dan pengujian modul. Kajian kuantitatif ini menggunakan tiga set soal selidik untuk menilai kesahan, kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian modul. Kesahan kandungan terhadap Modul InSeL dibuat oleh tujuh orang pakar dan nilai kesahan ditentukan melalui indeks kesahan kandungan (CVI). Nilai keseluruhan indeks kesahan kandungan Modul InSeL adalah tinggi dengan nilai 0.99 atau 99 peratus bagi kedua-dua nilai CVI bagi item (I-CVI) dan CVI bagi skala (S-CVI). Seramai 73 orang pelajar matrikulasi terlibat dalam kajian ini bagi menguji kebolehpercayaan dan kesesuaian modul yang dibangunkan. Dapatan kajian menunjukkan nilai pekali Alpha Cronbach’s bagi kebolehpercayaan Modul InSeL adalah memuaskan iaitu 0.775. Hasil dapatan soal selidik tahap kesesuaian menunjukkan Modul InSeL mencapai tahap peratus persetujuan yang tinggi iaitu melebihi 90% dengan min bagi ketiga-tiga konstruk iaitu isi kandungan (3.43), format persembahan (3.49) dan sumber rujukan (3.38). Secara keseluruhan, ini menunjukkan bahawa Modul InSeL telah memenuhi piawaian sesuatu modul dari aspek kandungan dan kualiti modul. Kesimpulannya, kajian ini berjaya menghasilkan satu modul kendiri bagi topik Pengamiran untuk pelajar matrikulasi yang menepati dan bersesuaian dengan standard sesuatu modul. Implikasinya, Modul InSeL boleh digunakan oleh pelajar untuk mempelajari topik Pengamiran secara kendiri.
|
| References |
Anderson, L.W. & Krathwohl (Eds.) (2001). A Taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Bakar, M.A.A., & Ismail, N. (2020). Mathematical instructional: A conceptual of redesign of active learning with metacognitive regulation strategy. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 633-648. Che Ahmad, C.N., Yahaya, A., & Sani, S.S. (2020). Development of Practical Video Module (V-Lab) to enhance teaching and facilitation of form four biology. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 10(2), 1-7. Chew, E.S., Abd Hamid, M.A., & Madar, A.R. (2017). Conceptual framework for designing and developing a creativity enhancement module in education incorporating indigenous perspectives. Pertanika Journal of Social Science and Humanities, 25(S), 67-82. Gagne, R. M. (1974). Educational technology and the learning process. Educational Researcher, 3(1), 3-8. Ghazali, D., & Sufean, H. (2016). Research methodology in education. Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Publisher. Go Silk, C.J., Go Silk, B.B. & Somblingo, R.A. (2017). Modular approach in teaching problem solving: A metacognitive process. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 6(8), 670-677. Hoban, R.A. (2019). A resource for introducing students to the integral concept. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(4), 603-616. Jamaludin, A., & Sidek, M.N. (2001). Pendekatan alternatif menentukan kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan modul program maju diri. Jurnal PERKAMA, 9, 97-118. Kouvela, E., Hernandez-Martinez, P., & Croft, T. (2017). Secondary-tertiary transition: How messages transmitted by lecturers can influence students’ identities as mathematics learners. Dlm Proceedings of the 41st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp.81-88). Lim, E.J.A. (2016). Effectiveness of modular instruction in word problem solving of BEED students. IOSR Journal of Mathematics (IOSR-JM), 12(5), 59-65. Lynn, M.R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35, 382– 385. Mohd Afifi, B.S., Nor’ain, M.T., Mohd Faiz. M.Y., & Muhamad Ikhwan, M.S. (2019). Adventure learning in basics statistics: Impact on students critical thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 12(3), 151-166. Murni, D., Helma & Mirna. (2019). Validity and practicality of calculus teaching materials based on integrated ict contextual problems to improve students problem solving skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1317, 012131. Nardo, M.T.B. (2017). Modular instruction enhances learner autonomy. American Journal of Educational Research, 5(10), 1024-1034. Polit, D.F., Beck, C.T., & Owen, S.V. (2007). Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 30(4), 459-467. Richey, R.C., & Klein, J.D. (2014). Design and developmental research. New York, NY : Routledge. Saadati, F., Ahmad Tarmizi, R., & Mohd Ayub, A.F. (2019). Managing Internet-Based Tutorial Module to support statistics learning among postgraduate students: Learners’ needs analysis. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 5(1), 1-17. Sari, D.P., & Surya, E. (2017). Development the module of Mathematics Statistics 1 by using the model of Dick and Carey design. International Journal Of Sciences: Basic And Applied Research (IJSBAR), 34(1), 237-246. Sazilah, S., & Faizal, N.L.A. (2017). Development and evaluation of form three mathematics i-Think module (Mi-T3) on algebraic formulae topic. In AIP Conference Proceedings, 1847, 030017. AIP Publishing LLC. Sevimli, E. (2016). Do calculus students demand technology integration into learning environment? case of instructional differences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(1), 37. Shahbazi, Z & Irani, A. (2016). Online Calculus and Pre-Calculus Modules. EdMedia 2016 - Vancouver, BC, Canada, 28-30. Shephard, K. (2003). Questioning, promoting and evaluating the use of streaming video to support student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 295-308. Sidek, M.N., & Jamaludin, A. (2008). Pembangunan modul bagaimana membina modul latihan dan modul akademik (Vol. 2). Selangor: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. Skemp, R.R. (2006). Relational understanding and instrumental understanding. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 12(2), 88-95. Suryani, A.I., Anwar, Hajidin, & Rofiki, I. (2020). The practicality of mathematics learning module on triangles using GeoGebra. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1470, 012079. Syamsulaini, S., & Mashitoh, H. (2016). Pengajaran berasaskan video dalam pembelajaran berpusatkan pelajar: analisis dan kajian kritikal. Journal of ICT in Education, 3, 24-33. Tasman, F., Ahmad, D., & Suherman, S. (2018). Kesulitan mahasiswa dalam mengkoneksikan sigma, area, dan definisi integral tentu secara geometri. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 2(2), 186-193. Ulhusna, M., Diana Putri, S., & Zakirman. (2019). Validity of integrated calculus module two stay two stray learning model for use in communities independent learning groups. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 314, 012061. Vasanti, G., & Vinod Kumar, V. (2016). Harnessing the power of active learning based Engineering Mathematics Module. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(40), 40. Voon, L.L., Julaihi, N.H., & Tang, H.E. (2017). Misconceptions and errors in learning integral calculus. Asian Journal of University Education AJUE), 13(1), 17-39. Wade, C., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P., Hazari, Z., & Watson, C. (2016). A comparison of mathematics teachers' and professors' views on secondary preparation for tertiary calculus. Journal of Mathematics Education at Teachers College, 7(1).
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |