UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Mohd Faisal Ab Salam
Title :Penilaian keupayaan model Kirkpatrick untuk penceritaan digital
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif
Year of Publication :2021
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini dilakukan apabila tiadanya satu instrumen yang khas untuk mengesahkan serta menguji kebolehpercayaan item bagi penceritaan digital terutamanya bagi subjek Bahasa Inggeris. Objektif kajian ini adalah untuk mengenal pasti tahap reaksi dan pembelajaran guru Bahasa Inggeris terhadap Instrumen Penilaian Penceritaan Digital (IPPD) yang dibangunkan menggunakan pendekatan Model Penilaian Kirkpatrick untuk menilai kualiti kandungan bahan penceritaan digital bagi mata pelajaran Bahasa Inggeris. Kajian ini telah dijalankan terhadap 180 orang guru Bahasa Inggeris yang mengajar di daerah Kuantan. Data yang diperolehi melalui instrumen penilaian dianalisis menggunakan analisis deskriptif. Dapatan kajian reaksi guru pakar terhadap IPPD adalah positif apabila nilai pekali Alpha Cronbach untuk kajian ini ialah 0.95 yang menunjukkan pemboleh ubah menyediakan ukuran dalaman secara konsisten. Sementara itu, nilai skor min yang diperolehi bagi tahap pembelajaran guru pakar Bahasa Inggeris adalah 3.79 (sp=0.89), menunjukkan guru pakar dapat mempelajari instrumen IPPD secara menyeluruh menggunakan pendekatan Model Penilaian Kirkpatrick. Hasil dapatan ini disyorkan untuk membantu pihak yang berkepentingan dalam melaksanakan penambahbaikan dalam aspek pembelajaran dan pemudahcaraan Bahasa Inggeris selaras dengan Standard 4 di dalam Standard Kualiti Pendidikan Malaysia Gelombang 2 (SKPMg2).

References

Abdul Aziz Md. Noor (2003). An investigation into the headship training programme

for aspiring primary school headteachers. Disertasi Doktor Falsafah,

University of Bristol.

 

Abdul Manan, K. (2013). MODEL PENILAIAN KIRKPATRICK : MENGKAJI

PENGARUH KOMUNIKASI, 29(2), 31–50.

 

Ab. Rahim Selamat. (2000). Kemahiran dalam sekolah bestari. Johor Bharu:

BadanCemerlang Sdn. Bhd

 

Abdul Razak, R., (2020). Pembelajaran Berasaskan Penghasilan Penceritaan Digital

Multimedia Bagi Menganalisis Novel Bahasa Melayu. [online] Ukm.my.

Available at:

 

Ahmad, Z., (2012). PEMBANGUNAN PERISIAN KURSUS MULTIMEDIAINTERAKTIF

SIMPULAN BAHASA THAI BERDASARKAN ANATOMI

(PKMI-SBT). [online] Ejournal.ukm.my. Available at:

 

Alliger, G. M., & Janak, E. A. (1989). Kirkpatrick’s levels of training criteria: thirty

years later. Personnel Psychology, 42, pp.331–342. [11] Gallagher. M. (2000).

Corporate universities. Higher education and the future: Emerging policy

issues. Paper presented at the Corporate University Week 2000. Sydney,

Australia.

 

Amjad Anas Abdul Malek. (2015). Penerokaan potensi penceritaan digital terhadap

sekolah rendah luar bandar dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris. Tanjong

Malim: Fakulti Seni, Komputeran dan Industri Kreatif, Universiti Pendidikan

Sultan Idris.

 

Asma Ahmad. (1994). Training design development: the practice of four development

agencies in Malaysia. Disertasi Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Bates, R., (2004). A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and

the principle of beneficence. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(3), pp.341-

347.

 

Babbie, E. (2007). The practice of social research (11th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson

Wadsworth.

 

Casper, M., Catton, J., & Westfall, S. (1998). Comprehension : Theories & Strategies.

Accessed on 14th August 2014, retrieved from

http://www.dominican.edu/academics/education/about/madaliennepeters/com

prehension

 

Chan, Y. F. (2003). Pendekatan penilaian: satu tinjauan dari aspek kesesuaiannya dalam

penilaian program latihan. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 13(1):65-81.

 

Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory.

New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

 

Fitzpatrick, J., L., Sanders, J.R., Worthen, B.,R. (2004). Program evaluation.

Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. New York, Pearson.

 

Gagne, R. M. (1962). Military training and principles of learning. American

Psychologist, 17(2), 83-91.http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0048613

 

Gunning, Thomas G. (1996). Creating Reading Instruction for All Children. Chapter 6,

192-236.

 

Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional Development and Teacher Change. Teachers and

Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381- 391.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512

 

Hanafi, K. and Abd. Rahim, M., (2017). PENGGUNAAN MEDIA SOSIAL DAN

FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI TERBENTUKNYA GERAKAN

SOSIAL OLEH PEMIMPIN PELAJAR UNIVERSITI DI BANDAR PEKAN

BARU, RIAU, INDONESIA. 2nd ed. [ebook] Available at:

 

Hiew, W. (2012). English Language Teaching and Learning Issues in Malaysia:

Learners’ Perceptions via Facebook Dialogue Journal. Journal of Arts, Science

& Commerce, 3, 11-19.

 

Hopkins, D.K dan Stanley, J.C (1981). Educational and psychological measurement

and evaluation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall

 

Institut Aminuddin Baki. (1991). Kajian pelaksanaan kursus pengurusan pendidikan

oleh Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (1981-1991). Genting Highlands: IAB.

Jarvis, P. (1996). Adult and continuing education (Ed. ke-2). New York: Routledge

Publisher.

 

John Hattie: Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to

achievement Routledge, Abingdon,(2008), 392 pp, ISBN 978-0-415-47618-8

(pbk)

 

JPNP. (2017). Perangkaan Pendidikan JPN Pahang. Sektor Pengurusan dan Maklumat

ICT. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

 

Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. (2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia

2013-2015. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2

 

Khalidah Haron. (1995). Evaluating the perceived effect of total quality management

(TQM) training program in Tenaga Nasional. Disertasi Sarjana Sains

(Pembangunan Sumber Manusia), Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Khoo, G. T. (1997). Evaluating the training programme on ISO 9002 at Esprit

Corporation Sdn. Bhd. Disertasi Sarjana Sains (Pembangunan Sumber

Manusia), Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Kintsch, W. & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and

production. Psychological Review, 85, 363–394

 

Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension constructionintegration

model. Psychological Review, 95, 163– 182

 

Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1975). Evaluating training programs. Wisconsin: American Society

for Training and Development, Inc

 

KirkpaKirkpatrick, D. L. (1994). Evaluating training programs - The Four Levels. Ed.

Pertama. San Francisco, CA: Berret-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

 

KirkpaKirkpatrick, D. L. (1996). Great ideas revisited. Training and Development

Journal50(1): 54-59.

 

KirkpaKirkpatrick, D. L. (2000). Evaluating training programs: the four levels - the

ASTD Handbook of Training Design and Delivery. Virgina: The American

Society of Training and Development.

 

Kruse, A. and Schmitt, E. (2006) A multidimensional scale for the measurement of

agreement with age stereotypes and the salience of age in social interaction.

Ageing and Society, 26, 393-411. doi:10.1017/S0144686X06004703

 

KPM. (2012). Dasar Pendidikan Kebangsaan.Moe, M. of E. (2012). To Uphold Bahasa

Malaysia & to Strengthen the English Language (MBMMBI). Retrieved from

http://www.moe.gov.my/jpnpahang/v4/index.php/en/corporate-info/dasarpendidikan/

mbmmbi.html

 

Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University

Press.http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164603

 

Mohd. Azhar Abdul Hamid, Paimah Atoma, Muhamed Fauzi Othman & Mohd. Nasir

Markom. (2004). Andragogi - mengajar orang dewasa belajar. Bentong: PTS

Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.

 

Mohd Majid Konting (1990). “Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan.” Kuala Lumpur:

Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka.

 

Molenda, M. (2003). In search of the elusive ADDIE model. Performance improvement

42 (5), 34–37.

 

Normann, A. (2011) Digital storytelling in second language learning: A qualitative

study on students’ reflections on potentials for learning. Norwegian University

of Science and Technology. Trondheim, Norway.

 

Normazidah Che Musa, Koo Yew Lie & Hazita Azman. (2012). Exploring English

language learning and teaching in Malaysia. GEMA OnlineTM Journal of

Language Studies 12(1), 35-51.

 

Noor Fatasya Idla Abdullah. (2012). Reka bentuk dan pembangunan koswer

penceritaan digital bagi mata pelajaran sejarah sekolah menengah. Tanjong

Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Nunnally, J.C. (1978) Psychometric theory. 2nd Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

 

Ong, C. S. (1992). Effectiveness of the in-service training programme for secondary

school principals at Institute Aminuddin Baki. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan,

Universiti Malaya.

 

Othman Mohamed. (2001). Penulisan tesis dalam bidang sains sosial terapan.

Serdand: UPM.

 

Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2004). Cognitive load theory: Instructional

implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive

architecture. Instruction Science, 32(2), 1-8.

 

Rafiza, A. R., & Maryam, A. R. (2013). Pembinaan Media Pengajaran berasaskan

Multimedia di kalangan Guru ICTL. Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia

Pasifik, 1, 20-31.

 

Reeves, M. (1994). Evaluating of training. Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications (M)

Sdn. Bhd.

 

Robin, B. (2008). The effective uses of digital storytelling as a teaching and learning

tool. Handbook of research on teaching literacy through the communicative and

visual arts (Vol. 2). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Radha Nambiar, Noraini Ibrahim, & Pramela Krish (2008). Penggunaan strategi

pembelajaran bahasa dalam kalangan pelajar Tingkatan Dua. Jurnal e-Bangi.

Jilid 3 (3).

 

Sathivalu Annamalai. (1995). An evaluation of a training program conducted by a

private training provider. Disertasi Sarjana Sains (Pembangunan Sumber

Manusia), Universiti Putra Malaysia.

 

Shelton, S. & Alliger, G. (1993). Who’s Afraid of Level 4 Evaluation?: A Practical

Approach. Training & Development – June.

 

Schank, Roger. Dynamic Memory Revisited, 2nd Edition. New York: Cambridge

University Press, (1999), ISBN 0-521-63398-2.

 

Sidek Mohd Noah. (2002). Reka bentuk penyelidikan: Falsafah, teori dan praktis.

Serdang: Penerbit UPM.

 

Sidek Mohd Noah & Jamaludin Ahmad. (2005). Pembinaan Modul: Bagaimana

Membina Modul Latihan dan Modul Akademik. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti

Putra Malaysia.

 

Siti Hamin Stapa, and Nadzrah Abu Bakar, and Rozmel Abdul Latiff, (2007) Literasi

penulisan Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar luar bandar: Implikasi

terhadap pengajaran dan pembelajaran. e-BANGI: Jurnal Sains Sosial dan

Kemanusiaan, 2 (2). p. 17. ISSN 1823-884x

 

Siti Rahayah Ariffin (2008). Inovasi dalam Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan.

Bangi: Fakulti Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Stevens, S. (1946). On the Theory of Scales of Measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677-

680. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1671815

 

Teehan, K. (2006). Digital Storytelling: In and Out of the Classroom. A

Professional

 

Development Resourse.

 

Teehan, K. (2006). Digital Storytelling: In and Out of the Classroom. A

Professional Development Resourse.

 

Teehan, K. (2006). Digital Storytelling: In and Out of the Classroom. A Professional

Development Resourse.

 

White, A. (1980). Book reviews : Bruce W. Tuckman. Conducting Educational

Research. (2nd ed.). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1978. Pp. xvi +

479. $13.95. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40(2), 562–563.

https://doi.org/10.1177/001316448004000244

 

Yahaya, A, and S Abdul Razak. (2010). “Teori Berkaitan Gaya Pembelajaran Dan

Kaedah Pengajaran.” Teori Berkaitan Gaya Pembelajaran Dan …, no. January.

 

Zamri, Rahimi, & Juliawati. (2009). Perbandingan Gaya Pengajaran Guru Bahasa

Melayu dan Guru Bahasa Inggeris ( The Comparative Study of Malay and

English Language Teachers Teaching Style ), 34(1), 67–92.

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)