UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Normarina Abd Rahman
Title :Pembinaan dan validasi instrumen pengukuran proses Matematik murid menggunakan model Rasch pelbagai faset
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pembangunan Manusia
Year of Publication :2022
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan membina dan menentusahkan instrumen proses matematik murid (ProM3). Kajian menggunakan model ADDIE melibatkan fasa analisis, reka bentuk, pembangunan, pelaksanaan serta penilaian. Reka bentuk kajian adalah pembinaan dan validasi instrumen melibatkan kaedah tinjauan pada fasa penilaian. Dua instrumen dibangunkan iaitu sampel tugasan berbentuk penyelesaian masalah berkaitan topiktopik Matematik tingkatan 1 beserta rubrik. Sejumlah 407 murid tingkatan satu daripada tiga kategori sekolah berasrama penuh terlibat sebagai sampel kajian. Respon murid bagi tugasan diskor oleh tujuh orang pemeriksa berpandukan rubrik untuk lima dimensi proses matematik iaitu penyelesaian masalah, penaakulan, komunikasi, perwakilan dan perkaitan. Hasil analisis penilaian oleh sembilan orang pakar menunjukkan tugasan dan rubrik mempunyai kesahan kandungan yang tinggi, dengan nilai CVR dalam julat 0.80 hingga 1.00. Model Rasch pelbagai faset (MFRM) digunakan bagi menentukan kesahan rubrik ProM3 daripada aspek kebolehan murid, ketegasan pemeriksa (rater) dan kesukaran item. Rubrik menunjukkan kesahan konstruk yang baik dengan nilai PTMEA CORR positif (0.32-0.75), dan nilai statistik fit dalam julat yang boleh diterima (0.5-1.5). Analisis unidimensionaliti menunjukkan instrumen dapat menerangkan 50.40% daripada kemahiran proses matematik yang diukur. Skala pemeringkatan juga berfungsi baik dengan saiz selang dalam julat 1.4 hingga 5.0. Sementara itu ukuran kesukaran item (+1.84--2.33 logit) tertabur sepadan dengan kebolehan murid (+4.75--3.58 logit). Rubrik juga menunjukkan nilai kebolehpercayaan item (0.99) dan persetujuan yang baik antara pemeriksa (48.7%). Peta pemboleh ubah menunjukkan responden terbahagi kepada empat tahap kemahiran proses matematik iaitu Cemerlang (2.46%), Baik (41.77%), Sederhana (52.58%) dan Lemah (3.19%). Min kemahiran proses matematik murid berada pada tahap sederhana (-0.38 logit). Kesimpulannya, instrumen yang dibangunkan mempunyai ciri-ciri psikometrik yang baik bagi mengukur proses matematik murid. Implikasinya, penggunaan instrumen boleh diperluaskan kepada murid-murid sekolah menengah dan boleh dijadikan model bagi mengukur kemahiran yang sama untuk topik-topik yang berlainan.

References

Adibah Abdul Latif. (2013). Pembangunan instrumen penilaian akhlak pelajar di

Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Awam. Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Teknologi

Malaysia.

 

Ag. Syahrole Ag. Saman, & Chin Kin Eng. (2017). Solving mathematics word

problems through reflection. International journal of academic research in

business and socials sciences, 6(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v6-i12/2497

 

Agarwal, B. P. K., & Agostinelli, A. (2020). Interleaving in Math: A research-based

strategy to boost learning. American Educator, (Spring), 24–40.

 

Akdemir, E. (2018). Investigating the reflective thinking skills of students for problem

solving. The Turkish online journal of educational technology, 1(November),

774–780.

 

Allred, S. R., Crawford, L. E., Duffy, S., & Smith, J. (2016). Working memory and

spatial judgments: Cognitive load increases the central tendency bias.

Psychonomic bulletin and review, 23(6), 1825–1831.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1039-0

 

Andrich, D., & Marais, I. (2019). A course in Rasch measurement theory.

https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7496-8

 

Ardiyanti, D., & Dinni, S. M. (2018). Aplikasi model Rasch dalam pengembangan

instrumen deteksi dini postpartum depression. Jurnal psikologi, 45(2), 81–97.

https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.29818

 

Arter, J., & McTighe, J. (2001). Scoring rubrics in the classroom: Using performance

criteria for assessing and improving student performance (First Edition).

California: Corwin Press, Inc.

 

Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio:

Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and evaluation in

counseling and development, 47(1), 79–86.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175613513808

 

Azizi Ahmad. (2010). Pendekatan alternatif dalam pentaksiran pembelajaran. In

Pentaksiran pembelajaran (pp. 79–88). Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan

Pustaka.

 

Azizi Alias, & Kamisah Osman. (2015). Assessing oral communication skills in

Science: A rubric development. Asia Pacific Journal of educators and education,

30, 107–122.

 

Azliza Muhammad. (2019). Pembinaan dan validasi Rubrik Pentaksiran Kendiri

Kemahiran Insaniah, e-Persona. Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Pendidikan

Sultan Idris.

 

Azmanirah Ab Rahman, Jamil Ahmad, Ruhizan Mohammad Yasin, & Nurfirdawati

Muhamad Hanafi (2020). The effect of rubric on rater’s severity and bias in tvet

laboratory practice assessment: Analysis using many-facet rasch measurement.

Journal of technical education and training, 12(1 Special Issue), 57–67.

https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2020.12.01.006

 

Azrilah Abd Aziz, Mohd Saidfudin Masodi, & Azami Zaharim. (2013). Asas model

pengukuran Rasch. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.

 

Baghaei, P. (2011). Validation of a multiple choice English vocabulary test with the

Rasch model. 2(5), 1052–1060. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1052-1060

 

Barkaoui, K. (2010). Do ESL essay raters’ evaluation criteria change with

experience? A mixed-methods, cross-sectional study. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 31-

57. doi:10.5054/tq.2010.214047

 

Beck, C. T., & Gable, R. K. (2003). Postpartum depression screening scale. Nursing

research, 52(5), 296–305.

 

Beswick, K., & Fraser, S. (2019). Developing mathematics teachers’ 21st century

competence for teaching in STEM contexts. ZDM - Mathematics education,

51(6), 955–965. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-019-01084-2

 

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2001). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental

measurement in the human sciences(2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associate Publishers, London.

 

Bond, T. G., & Fox, C. M. (2015). Applying the Rasch model: Fundamental

measurement in the human sciences (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge Taylor and

Francis Group.

 

Boone, W. J., & Staver, J. R. (2020). Advances in Rasch analyses in the human

sciences.

 

Boone, W. J., Staver, J. R., & Yale, M. S. (2014). Rasch analysis in the human

sciences (1st ed.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6857-4

 

Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into

learning. In Learning. https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734380

 

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York:

Springer Science + Bussiness Media.

 

Brentari, E., & Golia, S. (2013). Unidimensionality in the Rasch model: How to

detect and interpret. Statistica, 67(3), 253–261.

https://doi.org/10.6092/issn.1973-2201/3508

 

Breyfogle, M. L., & Lynch, C. M. (2010). Van Hiele revisited. Mathematics teaching

in the middle school, 16(4), 232–238.

 

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). General principles for assessing higher-order thinking. In

How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom (pp. 17–38).

 

Bruner, J. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage.

 

Burke, K. (2006). From standards to rubrics in 6 steps: Tools to assessing student

learning, K-8. California: Corwin Press.

 

Burns. N, & Grove, S. K. (1993). The practice of nursing research conduct,critique,

and utilization (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia: WB Saunders Company.

 

Caban, H. L. (2003). Rater group bias in the speaking assessment of four L1 Japanese

ESL students. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 1-44.

 

Cambridge University Press (2008) Facet. In Cambridge advanced learner's

dictionary & thesaurus (3rd ed.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/facet

 

Cambridge University Press (2008) Validation. In Cambridge advanced learner's

dictionary & thesaurus (3rd ed.

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/validation

 

Carson, J. (2007). A problem with problem solving : Teaching thinking without

teaching knowledge. The Mathematics educator, 17(2), 7–14.

 

Chan, S., Inoue, C., & Taylor, L. (2015). Developing rubrics to assess the readinginto-

writing skills: A case study. Assessing writing, 26.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2015.07.004

 

Charlesworth, R. (2012). Experiences in Math for young children (6th ed.). Boston:

Wardsworth, Cencage Learning.

 

Chong Sin Yee, Wong Jieh Tze, & Abdul Halim Abdullah. (2017). Pencapaian

Matematik TIMSS 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011 dan 2015 : Di mana kedudukan

Malaysia dalam kalangan negara Asia Tenggara ? Malaysian Journal of higher

order thinking skills in Education, (December).

 

Chun, L., & Yunnan, X. (2018). A study on rater reliability under holistic and analytic

scoring of CEPT writing by using generalizability theory and many-facet Rasch

model. Advances in economics, business and management research, 71(Emle),

1013–1019. https://doi.org/10.2991/emle-18.2018.201

 

Clark, K. K., Pittman, E., & Borko, H. (2005). Strategies for building mathematical

communication in the middle school classroom: Modeled in professional

development, implemented in the classroom. Current issues in middle level

education, 11(2), 1–12.

 

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and

applications. Journal of applied psychology, 78(1), 98–104.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

 

Costa, A. L. (2004). Habits of mind. Current surgery, 61(1), 101–103.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cursur.2003.09.009

 

Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2008). Learning and leading with habits of mind: 16

essential characteristics for success. Alexandria: Association for Supervision

and Curriculum Development.

 

Creswell, J.W (2017). Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research. (5th ed.). Pearson.

 

Creswell, J. W., & Cresswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative

and mixed methods approaches. (5th ed.). SAGE Publication.

 

Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from your panel of experts.

Applied nursing research, 5(4), 194–197. Retrieved from

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80008-4

 

De Ayala, R. J. (2009). The theory and practice of item response theory.

https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0703993104

 

Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to

the educative process. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company.

 

Doerr, H. M., & English, L. D. (2003). A modeling perspective on students’

mathematical reasoning about data. Journal for research in Mathematics

education, 34(2), 110–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/30034902

 

Douven, I. (2018). A Bayesian perspective on likert scales and central tendency.

Psychonomic bulletin and review, 25(3), 1203–1211.

https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1344-2

 

Dumas, D., Alexander, P. A., & Grossnickle, E. M. (2018). Relational reasoning and

its manifestations in the educational context : a systematic review of the

literature. Educational psychologist review, 25(3), 391–427.

 

Ebel, R.L. (1965). Measuring educational achievement (ke-2). Eaglewood Cliffs, N.J:

Prentice Hall.

 

Eckes, T. (2005). Examining rater effects in TestDaF writing and speaking

performance assessments : A many-facet Rasch analysis. Language assessment

quarterly, 2(3), 197–221.

 

Eckes, T. (2009). Many-facet Rasch measurement. Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228465956

 

Eckes, T. (2012). Operational rater types in writing assess- ment: Linking rater

cognition to rater behavior. Language Assessment Quarterly, 9, 270-292.

doi:10.1080/15434303.2 011.649381

 

Eckes, T. (2015). Introduction to many- facet Rasch measurement : Analyzing and

evaluating rater mediated assessment (2nd ed.). https://doi.org/10.3726/978-3-

653-04844-5

 

Eftah Abdullah, & Abd Aziz Abd Shukor. (2013). Pentaksiran prestasi & pentaksiran

rujukan standard dalam bilik darjah. Tanjung Malim.

 

Eggen, P., & Kauchak, D. (2010). Educational psychology: Windows on classroom.

New Jersey: Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.

 

Engelhard, G. (1994). Examining rater errors in the assessment of written

composition with a many-faceted Rasch model. 31(2), 93–112.

 

Engelhard, G., & Wind, S. A. (2018). What is invariant measurement with raters. In

invariant measurement with raters and rating scales (First, pp. 10–14).

https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766829-14

 

Erdem, E., & Gurbuz, R. (2015). An analysis of seventh-grade students’ mathematical

reasoning. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 44(1), 123.

https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.2015.007

 

Erguvan, I. D., & Dunya, B. A. (2020). Analyzing Rater Severity in A Freshman

Composition Course Using Many Facet Rasch Measurement. Language Testing

in Asia, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-020-0098-3

 

Fanari, R., Meloni, C., & Massidda, D. (2017). Early numerical competence and

number line task performance in kindergarteners. 14th International conference

on cognition and exploratory learning in digital age, 70–77.

 

Farah Zahidah Mohd Noor, Siti Adila Mohamad Yazi, & Nor Atiqah Ahmad Zaki.

(2017). The implementation of item analysis in community college. Advanced

journal of technical and vocational education, 1(4), 50–56.

https://doi.org/10.26666/rmp.ajtve.2017.4.11

 

Farrokhi, F., Esfandiari, R., & Dalili, M. V. (2011). Applying the many-facet Rasch

model to detect centrality in self-assessment, peer-assessment and teacher

assessment. World applied Sciences journal, 15, 70–77.

 

Fazura Mohd Noor, Sharifah Norul Akmar Syed Zamri, & Leong Kwan Eu. (2016).

Penaakulan perkadaran murid tahun lima dalam topik nisbah dan kadaran. Jurnal

pendidikan Malaysia, 41(2), 99–105.

 

Ferri, R. B. (2015). Mathematical thinking styles - an empirical study. (January 2006).

 

Fisher. (2007). Rating scale instrument quality criteria. Rasch measurement

transaction, 21(1), 1095.

 

Fox, C. M., & Jones, J. (1998). Uses of Rasch modelling in counselling psychology

research. Journal of counselling psychology, 45(1), 30–45.

 

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in

education (7th ed.). New York: Mc Graw Hill.

 

Freire, P. (1993). Education for critical consciousness. In The Paulo Freire Reader.

https://doi.org/10.1177/074171367402400405

 

Fuys, D. (1985). Van Hiele levels of thinking in Geometry. Education and urban

society, 17(4).

 

Gainsburg, J. (2008). Real-world connections in secondary mathematics teaching.

Journal of Mathematics teacher education, 11(3), 199–219.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-007-9070-8

 

Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2018a). Kerangka konseptual dan teoritikal

kajian. In Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis

kajian (Edisi Kedua, pp. 168–221). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya.

 

Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2018b). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan. In

Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian (Edisi

Kedua, pp. 117–134). Kuala Lumpur: Penebit Universiti Malaya.

 

Ghazali Darusalam, & Sufean Hussin. (2018c). Penyelidikan kuantitatif. In

Metodologi penyelidikan dalam pendidikan: Amalan dan analisis kajian (Edisi

Kedua, pp. 33–448). Kuala Lumpur: Penebit Universiti Malaya.

 

Ghazi, S. R. (2014). Formal operational stage of Piaget’s cognitive development

theory : An implication in learning Mathematics. 17(2), 71–85.

 

Glasersfeld, E. V. (1984). An introduction to radical constructivism. In The invented

reality. New York: Norton.

 

Glasersfeld, E. V., & Ackermann, E. K. (2011). Reflections on the concept of

experience and the role of consciousness. Constructivist foundation, 6(2), 193–

203.

 

Goldin G.A. (2014). Mathematical representations. In Lerman S. (eds) Encyclopedia

of Mathematics education. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4978-8_103

 

Grant, J. S., & Davis, L. L. (1998). Selection and use of content experts for instrument

development. Research in nursing health, 20, 269–274.

 

Gravemeijer, K., Stephan, M., Julie, C., Lin, F. L., & Ohtani, M. (2017). What

Mathematics education may prepare students for the society of the future?

International journal of Science and Mathematics education, 15, 105–123.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9814-6

 

Griffiths, R., & Clyne, M. (1994). Language in the Mathematics classroom (1st ed.).

Armadale, Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.

 

Guillaume, A. M. (2005). Classroom Mathematics inventory. Pearson Education.

 

Gulkilik, H., Kaplan, H. A., & Emul, N. (2019). Investigating the relationship

between argumentation and proof from a representational perspective.

International Journal for Mathematics teaching and learning, 20(2), 131–148.

 

Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action 1. Reason and

rationalization of society. In Beason press.

https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

 

Hanna, G. S., dan Dettmer, P. 2004. Assessment for effective teaching : using contextadaptive

planning. Boston: Allyn dan Bacon.

 

Hecimovich, M. D., Styles, I., & Volet, S. E. (2014). Development and psychometric

evaluation of scales to measure professional confidence in manual medicine : A

Rasch measurement approach. BMC research notes, 7(388), 1–14.

 

Hudiya Adzhar, Aidah Abdul Karim, & Muhammad Uzair Sahrin. (2018).

Pembangunan instrumen penerimaan e-pembelajaran pelajar pascasiswazah

menggunakan analisis Rasch. Jurnal pendidikan Malaysia, 42(2), 147–155.

https://doi.org/http: //dx.doi.org/10.17576/JPEn-2017-42.02-08 Pembangunan

 

Hulse, S. F. 2006. Test Statistics. In Teaching Technicques in the Radiologic Sciences

(Vol. 61(2), p. 160). New York: American Society of Radiologi Technologists.

 

Hung, S., Chen, P., Chen, H., Hung, S., Chen, P., & Chen, H. (2012). Improving

creativity performance assessment : A rater effect examination with many-facet

Rasch model (February 2015), 37–41.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.730331

 

Hwang, J. E. (2010). Promoting healthy lifestyles with aging : Development and

validation of the health enhancement lifestyle profile ( HELP ) using the Rasch

measurement model. The American journal of occupational therapy, 64(5).

https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2010.09088

 

Intaros, P., Inprasitha, M., & Srisawadi, N. (2014). Students’ problem solving

strategies in problem solving-mathematics classroom. Procedia - social and

behavioral sciences, 116, 4119–4123.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.901

 

Johnson, J. S., & Lim, G. S. (2009). The influence of rater language background on

writing performance assessment. Language Testing, 26, 485-505.

doi:10.1177/0265532209340186

 

Johnson, R. L., Penny, J. A., & Gordon, B. (2009). Assessing performance:

Designing, scoring, and validating performance tasks. New York: Guilford

Press.

 

Jonassen, D. H. (2004). Learning to solve problems ; An instructional design guide.

San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

 

Jurezak, P. M. (1997). The language and metaphor of Jean Piaget. Educational

psychology previea, 9(3), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024795410368

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2015). Dokumen Standard Kurikulum dan

Pentaksiran Matematik Tingkatan 1 (Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum).

Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Klerlein, J., & Hervey, S. (2000). Mathematics as a complex problem-solving activity.

Retrieved from https://www.generationready.com/mathematics-as-a-complexproblem-

solving-activity/

 

Knoch, U. (2007). Do empirically developed rating scales function differently to

conventional rating scales for academic writing? Spaan Fellow Working Papers

in Second or Foreign Language Assessment, 5, 1-36.

 

Kojo, A., Laine, A., & Näveri, L. (2018). How did you solve it? – Teachers’

approaches to guiding mathematics problem solving. International journal on

Math, Science and technology education, 6(1), 22–40.

https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.6.1.294

 

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Experiential learning theory. In Encyclopedia of

the sciences of learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_227

 

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and

development. Prentice Hall, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-7223-

8.50017-4

 

Krawec, J. L. (2010). Problem representation and mathematical problem solving of

students of varying Math ability. University of Miami.

 

Lamoureux, E. L., Pesudovs, K., Thumboo, J., & Saw, S. (2009). An evaluation of the

reliability and validity of the visual functioning questionnaire ( VF-11 ) using

Rasch analysis in an Asian population. Investigative ophthalmology & visual

science, (May). https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.08-2359

 

Lans, R. M. Van Der, Grift, W. J. C. M. Van De, & Veen, K. Van. (2015).

Developing a teacher evaluation instrument to provide formative feedback using

student ratings of teaching acts. Educational measurement: Issue and practice,

34(3), 18–27.

 

Lantz, H. B. (2004). Rubrics for assessing student achievement in science grades K-

12. California: Corwin Press.

 

Lawshe, C. H. (1975). A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel

psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x

 

Lawson, A. E. (1978). The development and validation of a classroom test of formal

reasoning. Journal of research in science teaching, 15(1), 11–24.

 

Lean, G., & Clements, M. A. Ken. (2010). Spatial ability, visual imagery, and

Mathematical performance. Educational studies in Mathematics, 12(3), 267–299.

 

Linacre, J. M. (1999). Investigating rating scale utility. Journal of outcome

measurement, 3(2), 103–122.

 

Linacre, J. M. (2002). Understanding Rasch measurement: Optimizing rating cale

category effectiveness. Journal of applied measurement, 3(1), 85–106.

 

Linacre, J. M. (2015). New approaches to determining reliability and validity.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport, 71(November), 129–136.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2000.11082796

 

Linacre, J. M. (2018). A user’s guide to FACETS Rasch model computer Programs.

 

Linacre, J. M. (2019). Winsteps help for Rasch analysis 4.4.0.

 

Linacre, J. M. (2021). Winsteps help for Rasch analysis 4.8.0.

 

Linacre, J. M. (1994). Sample size and item calibration stability. Rasch measurement

transactions, 7(4), 328.

 

Linacre, J. M. (1997). Guidelines for rating scales and Andrich thresholds. Midwest

objective measurement seminar. Retrieved from https://www.rasch.org/rn2.htm

 

Linacre, J. M. (2003). Rasch power analysis: Size vs. significance: Infit and outfit

mean-square and standardized chi-square fit statistic. Rasch measurement

transactions, 17(1), 918. Retrieved from https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt171n.htm

 

Linacre, J. M. (2002). What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean?

Rasch Measurement Transactions, 16(2), 878.

 

Linacre, J. M, & Tennant, A. (2009). More about critical eigenvalue sizes (variances)

in standardized-residual principal components analysis (PCA). Rasch

measurement transaction, 23(3), 1228.

 

Linacre J. M. & Wright, (2002). Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness.

Journal of Applied Measurement, 3(1), 85-106

 

Loewenthal, K. M. 2001. An introduction to psychological tests and scales. East

Sussex: Psychology Press.

 

Lunz, M. E. (1997). Performance examinations: Technology for analysis and standard

setting. Annual meeting of the National council of measurement in education.

https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.mct-16-0142

 

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing

research, 35(6), 382–386.

 

Matteo, S. (1993). Review of Vico revisited : Orthodoxy, naturalism and science in

the "Scienza Nuova. Italica, 70(1), 99–103.

 

Mazlini Adnan, & Nurul Sarah Jalil. (2016). Keupayaan murid cemerlang akademik

tingkatan empat dalam menyelesaikan masalah Algebra bukan rutin. Jurnal

pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 6(1), 58–67.

 

McIntire, S. A., & Miller, L. A. 2007. Foundation of Psychological Testing: A

Practical Approach (2nd.ed). California: Sage Publications.

 

Mcleod, S. (2017). Kolb-learning styles. Retrieved from

www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html

 

McLeod, S. (2018). Bruner. Retrieved from

https://www.simplypsychology.org/bruner.html

 

McNamara, T. F. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London:

Longman.

 

Merriam, B. S. (2001). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach.

California: Josey-Bass Inco.

 

Mezirow, J. (2004). Transformative learning: Theory to practice. New directions for

adult and continuing education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ace.7401

 

Mitcham, E. C. (2015). Teacher capacity and attitude toward data : An examination

of the association between teacher beliefs and student performance on the

measures of academic progress assessment.

 

Mohd Uzi Dollah, Noor Shah Saad, Mohd Faizal Nizam lee Abdullah, & Qismullah

Yusof. (2016). Penerapan nilai rasionalisme dan objektivisme dalam pengajaran

guru Matematik sekolah rendah. Jurnal pendidikan Sains & Matematik

Malaysia, 6(2), 85–108.

 

Moskal, B. M. (2003). Recommendations for developing classroom performance

assessments and scoring rubrics. Practical assessment, research & evaluation,

8(14), 1–5.

 

Murphy, K., & Davidshofer, C. (1998). Psychological testing; Principles and

applications (ke-4). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

 

Mushlihah Rohmah, & Sugeng Sutiarso. (2018). Analysis problem solving in

mathematical using theory Newman. 14(2), 671–681.

https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80630

 

Myford, C. M., & Wolfe, E. W. (2003). Detecting and measuring rater effects using

many-facet Rasch measurement : Part I. Journal of applied measurement, 4(4),

386–422.

 

Myford, C. M., & Wolfe, E. W. (2004). Detecting and measuring rater effects using

many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II. Journal of applied measurement, 5(2),

189–227.

 

Nielsen, J. B., Kyvsgaard, J. N., Sildorf, S. M., Kreiner, S., & Svensson, J. (2017).

Item analysis using Rasch models confirms that the Danish versions of the

DISABKIDS ® chronic-generic and diabetes-specific modules are valid and

reliable. Health and quality of life outcomes, 1–10.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0618-8

 

Nik Azis Nik Pa. (1999). Pendekatan kontruktivisme radikal dalam pendidikan

Matematik. Kuala Lumpur.

 

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of students (6th.).

Arizona. United States: Pearson.

 

Noor Akmar Azlan, & Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee Abdullah. (2017). Komunikasi

matematik: Penyelesaian masalah dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran

Matematik. Jurnal pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia, 7(1), 16–31.

 

Noor Lide Abu Kassim. (2011). Judging behaviour and rater errors : An application of

the many-facet Rasch model. Gema online journal of language studies,

11(September).

 

Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin, Marzita Puteh, Mazlini Adnan, Mohd Faizal Nizam Lee

Abdullah, & Amalina Ibrahim. (2015). Persepsi dan amalan pengajaran guru

Matematik dalam penyelesaian masalah Algebra. Jurnal pendidikan Sains &

Matematik Malaysia, 5(2), 12–22.

 

Nor'ain Mohd Tajudin, & Mohan Chinnappan (2016). Relationship between scientific

reasoning skills and mathematics achievement among Malaysian students.

Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, 1(1), 96–107.

 

Nor Mashitah Mohd Radzi. (2017). Pembinaan dan pengesahan instrumen

pentaksiran prestasi standard awal pembelajaran dan perkembangan awal

kanak-kanak. Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Malaya.

 

Nor Syamimi Samsudin, Ismail Samsudin, Ahmad Faisol Yusof, & Mohd Zikri Mohd

Zaki. (2018). Improving students learning approach in mathematical thinking

through constructivist learning approach with creativity for architecture students.

Idealogy, 3(2), 155–164.

 

Noraini Idris. (2010). Penyelidikan dalam pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Mc Graw Hill

(Malaysia).

 

Nordin Abd Razak, & Azadeh Shafaei. (2016). The variation in teaching and learning

practices and their contribution to Mathematics performance in PISA 2012. In

What can PISA 2012 Data tell us?. Brill Sense.123-157

 

Nunally J.C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: Mc Graw Hill Company.

 

Nurfirdawati Muhamad Hanafi. (2016). Pembangunan dan penentusahan rubrik

pentaksiran prestasi bagi mentaksir projek reka bentuk seni bina di Politeknik

Malaysia. Tesis Doktor Falsafah, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Oers, B. Van. (2010). Emergent mathematical thinking in the context of play.

(December 2009), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9225-x

 

Ojose, B. (2008). Applying Piaget’s theory of cognitive development to Mathematics

instruction. The Mathematics educator, 18(1), 26–30.

 

Onal, H., Inan, M., & Bozkurt, S. (2017). A research on mathematical thinking skills:

Mathematical thinking skills of athletes in individual and team sports. 5(9), 133–

139. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i9.2428

 

Osadebe, P. U., & Agbure, B. (2018). Assessment of differential item functioning in

social studies multiple choice questions in basic education certificate

examination. European journal of education studies, 4(9) 236–257.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1301272

 

Ostrow, J. (1999). Making problems, creating solutions: Challenging young

Mathematicians (1st ed.). Portland, Maine: Stenhouse Publishers.

 

Pamela, O. (2009). An analysis of the strengths and limitation of qualitative and

quantitative research paradigms. Problems of education in the 21st century, 13,

13–18.

 

Perlman, C. L. (2003). Performance assessment: Designing appropriate performance

tasks and scoring rubrics. In The CPS performance assessment idea book.

Chicago: Chicago Public Schools.

 

Pesudovs, K., Burr, J. M., Harley, C., & Elliott, D. B. (2007). The development,

assessment, and selection of questionnaires. 84(8), 663–674.

 

Piaget, J. (2008). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood 1. Human

development, 14, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1159/000112531

 

Piaget, J. (1966). The psychology of intelligence and education. Childhood education,

42(9), 528. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.1966.10727991

 

Piaget, J. (2015). The attainment of invariants and reversible operations in the

development of thinking. Social research, 51(1), 167–184.

 

Polya, G. (2002). The goals of mathematical education. Mathematics teaching,

181(December), 42–44.

 

Ponte, J. P. (2007). Investigations and explorations in the Mathematics classroom.

ZDM International journal on Mathematics education, 39(5–6), 419–430.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0054-z

 

Popham, W. J. (2014). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know. Boston:

Pearson Education.

 

Pound, L. (2008). Thinking and learning about Mathematics in the early years. New

York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.

 

Quaigrain, K., & Arhin, A. K. (2017). Using reliability and item analysis to evaluate a

teacher-developed test in educational measurement and evaluation. Cogent

education, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1301013

 

Raiche, G. (2005). Critical eigenvalue sizes (variances) in standardized residual

principal components analysis (PCA). Rasch measurement transaction, 19(1),

1012.

 

Rasiman, Prasetyowati, D., & Kartinah. (2020). Development of learning videos for

junior high school math subject to enhance mathematical reasoning.

International journal of education and practice, 8(1), 18–25.

https://doi.org/10.18488/journal.61.2020.81.18.25

 

Ridwan, I. I. (2018). Rasch model validation of an instrument to measure students’

attitude towards learning embedded systems design course. (February).

 

Rothstein, A., Rothstein, E., & Lauber, G. (2007). Write for Mathematics (2nd ed.).

California, USA: Corwin Press.

 

Rubio, D. M., Berg-Weger, M., & Tebb, S. (2003). Objectifying content validity:

Conducting a content validity study in social work research. Social work

research, 27(June 2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/27.2.94

 

Russian, M. K., & Airasian, P. W. (2012). Classroom assessment: Concepts and

application (Seventh). Boston: Mc Graw Hill.

 

Samir, A., & Tabatabaee-yazdi, M. (2020). Translation quality assessment rubric : A

Rasch model-based validation. International Journal of Language Testing,

10(October).

 

Schaefer, E. (2008). Rater bias patterns in an EFL writing assessment. Language

Testing, 25, 465-493. doi:10.1177/ 0265532208094273

 

Scheel, C., Mecham, J., Zuccarello, V., & Mattes, R. (2018). An evaluation of the

inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of OccuPro’s functional capacity

evaluation. 60, 465–473. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-182754

 

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). Cognitive Science and Mathematics education. Hillsdale,

NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

 

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2007). Problem solving in the United States, 1970–2008: Research

and theory, practice and politics. Zdm Mathematics education, 39(5–6), 537–551.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0038-z

 

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2013). Reflections on problem solving theory and practice. The

Mathematics enthusiast, 10(1).

 

Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action.

New York: Basic.

 

Scusa, T. (2008). Five processes of mathematical thinking (University of Nebraska-

Lincoln). Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/mathmidsummative/38

 

Shara Nor Raifana, Noor Shah Saad, & Mohd Uzi Dollah. (2016). Analisis jenis

kesilapan melalui kaedah Newman error dalam penyelesaian masalah berayat

Matematik dalam kalangan murid tahun 5. Jurnal pendidikan Sains & Matematik

Malaysia, 6(2).

 

Shirazi, M. A. (2019). For a greater good: Bias analysis in writing assessment. SAGE

Open, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822377

 

Siti Eshah Mokshein, Haliza Ishak, & Hishamuddin Ahmad. (2019). The use of Rasch

measurement model in English testing. Cakrawala pendidikan, 38(1), 16–32.

https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i1.22750

 

Siti Rahayah Ariffin, Rodiah Idris, & Noriah Mohd Ishak. (2010). Differential item

functioning in Malaysian Generic Skills Instrument (MyGSI). Jurnal pendidikan

Malaysia, 35(1), 1–10.

 

Sjoblom, M. (2015). Promoting student to student interactions in Mathematics.

Holmbergs, Malmo University.

 

Smith, E. V. J., Conrad, K. M., Chang, K., & Piazza, J. (2002). An introduction to

Rasch measurement for scale development and person assessment. 10(3), 189–

206.

 

Stacey, K. (2014). What is mathematical thinking and why is it important? (June).

 

Stergar, C. (2005). Performance task, checklist and rubrics. Illinois: Pearson

Education.

 

Subramaniam, M. (2017). Pemahaman murid tahun lima tentang luas segi empat.

Universiti Malaya.

 

Sujadi, I., & Masamah, U. (2017). Mathematical reflective thinking processes of

senior high school students. Social Sciences and Humanities, 25, 115–126.

 

Sukmadewi, T. S. (2014). Improving students’ mathematical thinking and disposition

through probing and pushing questions. Jurnal matematika integratif, 10(2), 127.

https://doi.org/10.24198/jmi.v10.n2.10255.127-138

 

Surayah Zaidon, Aminah Ayob, & Othman Ikhsan. (2014). Pembinaan rubrik

penilaian penulisan kanak-kanak. 7, 86–95.

 

Syahputra, E. (2013). Peningkatan kemampuan spasial siswa melalui penerapan

pembelajaran matematika realistik. Jurnal cakrawala pendidikan, 3(3), 353–364.

https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.1624

 

Syed Abdul Hakim Syed Zainuddin, & Mohini Mohamed. (2010). Keupayaan dan

sikap dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematik bukan rutin. Jurnal teknologi,

53, 47–62.

 

Tarzimah Tambychik, & Thamby Subahan Mohd Meerah (2010). Students’

difficulties in Mathematics problem-solving : What do they say ? 8(5), 142–151.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.020

 

Testa, S., Toscano, A., Rosato, R., & Green, K. E. (2018). Distractor efficiency in an

item pool for a statistics classroom exam: Assessing its relation with item

cognitive level classified according to Bloom’s taxonomy. Quantitative

psychology and measurement, 9(August), 1–12.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01585

 

Tuan Siti Humaira Tuan Hashim, & Mohamad Amir Shah Ahmad. (2016). Analisis

kesalahan Newman dalam penyelesaian masalah Matematik Tahun 3. Jurnal

pendidikan Sains & Matematik Malaysia Vol 6, 6(2), 69–84.

 

Tuckman, B. W. 1999. Conducting Educational Research (5th ed.). Forth Worth :

Harcourt Brace College.

 

Van Zile-Tamsen, C. (2017). Using Rasch analysis to inform rating scale

development. Research in higher education, 58(8), 922–933.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9448-0

 

Veloo, A. (2010). Hubungan di antara orientasi pembelajaran Matematik (OPM)

dengan pencapaian Matematik. Asia Pacific journal of educators and education,

25, 33–51.

 

Verhelst, N. (2001). Testing the unidimensionality assumption of the Rasch model.

MPR-Online, 6(3), 231–271.

 

Wen, T. K., Nor’ain Mohd Tajudin, & Rohidah Masri. (2017). Pembinaan item dalam

bidang perkaitan bagi mata pelajaran Matematik tingkatan empat berdasarkan

model taksonomi pemprosesan maklumat. Jurnal pendidikan Sains & Matematik

Malaysia, 7(2), 1–18.

 

Wigglesworth, G. (1993). Exploring bias analysis as a tool for improv- ing rater

consistency in assessing oral interaction. Language Testing, 10, 305-335.

doi:10.1177/026553229301000306

 

Wilson, H. . (1989). Research in nursing (2nd ed.). Redwood City CA:

Addison‐Wesley.

 

Wind, S. A. (2019). Examining the impacts of rater effects in performance

assessments. Applied psychological measurement, 43(2), 159–171.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621618789391

 

Wood, T. (2001). Teaching differently : Creating opportunities for learning

Mathematics. Theory into practice, 40(2), 110–117.

https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4002

 

Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1989). Observations are always ordinal;

measurements, however, must be interval. Archives of physical medicine and

rehabilitation, 70(12), 857–860.

 

Wright, B. D., & Linacre, J. M. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch

measurement transactions, 8(3), 370. Retrieved from

https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt83b.htm

 

Wright, B. D., & Masters, G. N. (1982). Rating scale analysis Rasch measurement.

Chicago: MESA Press Chicago.

 

Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design. Chicago: MESA Press

Chicago.

 

Wright, B. D, Perkins, K., & Dorsey, J. K. (2000). Rasch measurement instead of

regression. Multiple linear regression viewpoints, 26(2).

 

Yilmaz, F. (2017). Analysis of the rater effects in the rating of diagnostic trees

prepared by teacher candidates by the many-facet Rasch model. Journal of

education and practice, 8(18), 174–184. Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333162837

 

Yin, K. R. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park,

California: Sage Publication.

 

Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An

overview. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 3–17.

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)