UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Zahirah Shoba Abdullah
Title :Hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar dengan tingkah laku kewarganegaraan organisasi guru di sekolah-sekolah rendah daerah Gombak Selangor
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Pengurusan dan Ekonomi
Year of Publication :2020
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menentukan hubungan kepimpinan distributif guru besar dengan tingkah laku kewarganegaraan organisasi (TKO) guru sekolah rendah di daerah Gombak, Selangor. Kepimpinan distributif guru besar dikaji berdasarkan persepsi guru. Teori Gordon telah gunakan sebagai asas untuk menerangkan mengenai kepimpinan distributif yang berfokus kepada empat dimensi iaitu penetapan dan perkongsian misi, visi dan matlamat sekolah, budaya sekolah, amalan kepimpinan dan perkongsian tanggungjawab. Teori Organ pula digunakan untuk menerangkan mengenai tingkah laku kewarganegaraan organisasi guru yang berfokus kepada lima dimensi iaitu prinsip utamakan kesejahteraan orang lain, sifat teliti dan cermat, semangat kerja, kesopanan dan nilai murni sivik. Kajian ini menggunakan reka bentuk korelasi. Seramai 320 guru telah dipilih secara rawak sistematik daripada 12 buah sekolah rendah yang mempunyai bilangan guru lebih 100 orang. Instrumen kajian terdiri daripada satu set soal selidik yang telah disahkan oleh tiga orang pakar dan mempunyai kebolehpercayaan yang tinggi berdasarkan pekali Cronbach Alpha α = 0.92. Data kajian telah dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan inferens seperti kekerapan, peratusan, min (M), sisihan piawai (SP) dan korelasi Pearson. Dapatan utama kajian menunjukkan responden bersetuju (M = 3.19; SP = 0.74) bahawa guru besar memiliki kepimpinan distributif terutama dalam aspek perkongsian tanggungjawab (M = 3.31; SP = 0.77) namun aspek amalan kempimpinan (M = 2.98; SP = 0.71 ) agak kurang berkesan. Dalam konteks TKO, guru percaya (M = 3.49; SP = .57) bahawa mereka mengamalkan TKO terutama dalam dimensi kesopanan (M = 3.61; SP = 0.52) namun aspek nilai murni sivik (M = 3.38 ; SP = 0.64) kurang diamalkan. Hubungan di antara kepimpinan distributif guru besar dengan TKO guru menunjukkan korelasi positif yang signifikan tetapi sederhana berasaskan pekali Pearson (r = 0.48; p

References

Abdull Sukor Shaari, Ab. Aziz Yusof, Mohd Khan Jamal Khan, Tang Swee Mei, Lim

Kong Teong. (2008). Keadilan Penilaian Prestasi Dalam Kalangan Guru Dan

Hubungannya Dengan Motivasi Kerja Dan Prestasi Akademik Sekolah.

International Journal of Management Studies, 15, 159–176.

 

Abu Nayeem Mohammad Salahuddin. (2011). Perceptions of Effective Leadership in

Bangladesh Secondary Schools: Moving towards Distributed Leadership?

University of Canterbury.

 

Ahmet Avci. (2016). Effect of Leadership Styles of School Principals on Organizational

Citizenship Behaviors. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(11), 1008–1024.

 

Aini Marzita Mansor & Mohd Hasani Dali (2016). Hubungan Dan Kesan Kepimpinan

Kendiri Guru Terhadap Gelagat Kewarganegaraan Organisasi. UUM -

UMSIDA.

 

Ali Çağatay Kılınç. (2014). A Quantitative Study of the Relationship between

Distributed Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: Perceptions

of Turkish Primary School Teachers. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching,

3(2), 69–78.

 

Anit Somech, & I. R. (2007). Promoting Organizational Citizenship Behavior in

Schools: The Impact of Individual and Organizational Characteristics.

Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(1).

 

Baharak Talebloo, Ramli Basri, Aminuddin Hassan & Soaib Asimiran (2015).

Citizenship Behaviour in Primary Schools: Teacher’s Perception. Faculty of

Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Malaysia.

 

Burns T, Carpenter J (2008). Organizational citizenship and student achievement. J.

Cross-Discipl. Perspect. Educ. 1(1):51-58.

 

Bush, T. (2007). Editorial: Theory and Research in Educational Leadership and

Management. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(1),

5–8.

 

Choong Yuen Onn, Jamal Nordin Yunus, Hamidah Yusof, Krishna Moorthy & Seow

Ai Na (2018): The mediating effect of trust on the dimensionality of

organizational justice and organisational citizenship behaviour amongst

teachers in Malaysia, Educational Psychology

 

Christie Augustine Kiek. (2015). The Relationship Between Emotional Intelligence,

Teacher Job Satisfaction, and Organisational Citizenship Behaviour Among

Teachers In Public Primary School. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Chua Yan Piaw (2006). Kaedah Dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Buku 1 - Kaedah

Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Mcgraw Hill

 

Chua Yan Piaw (2006). Kaedah Dan Statistik Penyelidikan. Buku 2 - Asas Statistik

Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Mcgraw Hill.

 

Copland, M. A. (2001). The Myth of the Superprincipal. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(1), 528–

533.

 

Davis, M.W. (2009). Distributed Leadership and School Performance. Tesis

Kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan. The faculty of the Graduate School of

Education and Human Development of the George Washington University,

UMI Number 3344534.

 

DeBerry, S. L. (2010). Using Transformational Leadership To Change Organizational

Culture In A Government Agency. Capella University.

 

DiPaola, M.F. and Tschannen-Moran, M. (2001) Organizational Citizenship Behavior

in Schools and Its Relationship to School Climate. Journal of School

Leadership, 11, 424-447.

 

Elmore, R. (2000). Building a new structure for school leadership. Washington DC:

The Albert Shanker Institute.

 

Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and

performance. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Education Press.

 

Farah Najwa Ismail (2014). Kecerdasan emosi dan komitmen organisasi dalam

kalangan pensyarah di Politeknik Sultan Abdul Halim Muadzam Shah, Jitra,

Kedah. Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

 

Fredricks, J. A. (2011). Engagement in school and out-of-school contexts: A

multidimensional view of engagement. Theory Into Practice, 50(4), 327-335.

 

Gordon, Z.V. ( 2005). The Effect Of Distributed Leadership On Student Achievement.

Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Central Connecticut State

University, New Britain.

 

Gronn, P. (2002). Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis. The Leadership

Quarterly, 13(4), 423-451.

 

Gronn, P. (2008). The future of distributed leadership, Journal of Educational, Vol.46

No. 2, pp. 141-158

 

Hallinger & Heck. (1998). Exploring The Principal’s Contribution to School

Effectiveness: 1980-1995*, School Effectiveness and School Improvement

1998, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 157-191

 

Harris, A. (2002). Effective Leadership in Schools Facing Challenging

Contexts, School Leadership & Management, 22:1, 15-26.

 

Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or

misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11

– 24.

 

Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2005). Improving schools through teacher leadership.

Maidenhead: Open University Press.

 

Harris. A. & Townsend. A. (2007). Developing Leaders for Tomorrow: Releasing

System Potential, School Leadership & Management, 27:2, 167-177.

 

Harris, A., & Spillane, J. (2008). Distributed Leadership through the Looking Glass.

Management in Education, 22, 31-34.

 

Hartley, D. (2007). The Emergence Of Distributed Leadership In Education: Why

Now? British Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 202–214.

 

Hoy, A. W., Hoy, W. K., & Kurz, N. M. (2008). Teacher’s academic optimism: The

development and test of a new construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24,

821–835

 

Hulpia, Hester & Devos, G. (2009). ’Exploring the link between distributed leadership

and job satisfaction of school leaders. Educational Studies, 35(2), 153 - 171.

 

Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception

of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teacher’s and teacher leaders’

job satisfaction and organisational commitment. American Educational

Research Association.

 

Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Keer, H.V. (2010a). The influence of distributed leadership

on teachers’ organizational commitment: A multilevel approach of Educational

Research, 103, 40-52.

 

Jamilah Ahmad & Yusof Boon. (2011). Amalan Kepimpinan Sekolah Berprestasi

Tinggi (SBT) di Malaysia, Journal of Edupres, Volume 1 September

2011,Pages 323-33, Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

Johor, Malaysia

 

Ghaith, G., & Shaaban, K. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of teaching

concerns, teacher efficacy, and selected teacher characteristics. Teaching and

Teacher Education, 15(5), 487-496.

 

Jamalulail, A.W., Aida Hanim, A.H., Suriati, Z & Md Fuad, M.R. (2013). The

relationsip between headteacher's distributed leaership practices and teachers'

motivation in national primary schools. Asian Social Science (9,16).

 

Joohari Ariffin. (2014). Keadilan Organisasi, Tingkah Laku Kewarganegaraan

Organisasi Dan Kepercayaan Di Sekolah Rendah Utara Semenanjung

Malaysia. Universiti Sains Malaysia.

 

Joseph, F. H., Earl, B. & Freud, H. (1997). Explaining Social Issues. London : Pine

Forge Press.

 

Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2013). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia.

Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.

 

Kidwell, R. E., Jr., Mossholder, K. W., & Bennett, N. (1997). Cohesiveness and

organizational citizenship behavior: A multilevel analysis using work groups

and individuals. Journal of Management, 23(6), 775-793.

 

Kimball, K., & Sirotnik, K. A. (2000). The Urban School Principalship. Take this Job

and...! Education and Urban Society, 32(4), 535–543.

 

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size For Research

Activities. Educational And Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.

 

Lei Wang, Kim T. Hinrichs, Leonel Prieto, J. P. H. (2013). Five dimensions of

organizational citizenship behavior: Comparing antecedents and levels of

engagement in China and the US. Asia Pac J Manag, 30, 115–147.

 

Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (1999). Transformational school leadership effects: A

reproduction. School Effectiveness and School Improvemen, 10(4), 451–479.

 

Mangin, M. M. (2007). Facilitating Elementary Principals’ Support for Instructional

Teacher Leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(3), 319–357.

 

Manouchehr Jofreh, Fayegh Mohammadi, A. Y. (2012). Leadership distribution

consequences in schools: A particular look at organizational citizenship

behavior of teacher. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 6(12),

259–268.

 

Maria Vlachadi, & M. F. (2013). Differentiation of Teachers’ and Principals’

Engagement in Distributed Leadership according to Their Demographic

Characteristics. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(4), 19–30.

 

McCloskey, M. W. (2015). What is Transformational Leadership?

http://people.bethel.edu/pferris/otcommon/TransformationalLeadership.pdf

 

Mohd Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur:

Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka.

 

Harris, A., & Muijs, D. (2003). Teacher leadership and school improvement. Education

Review, 16, 39-42.

 

Organ, D. W. (1988). Issues in organization and management series. Organizational

Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome. Lexington

Books/D. C. Heath and Com.

 

Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational Citizenship Behavior: It's Construct Clean-Up Time.

Human Performance, 10(2), 85-97.

 

Organ, D. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship

behavior: Its nature, antecedents, and consequences. USA: Sage Publications,

Inc.

 

Oluwatayo, J. 2012. Validity and reliability issues in educational research. Journal of

Educational and Social Research 2, 391-400

 

Öznur Ataş Akdemir , Ahmet Ayik . The Impact of Distributed Leadership Behaviors

of School Principals on the Organizational Commitment of Teachers. Universal

Journal of Educational Research 5.12B (2017) 18 – 2.

 

Pallant, J. (2010). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using

SPSS. Maidenhead: Open University Press/McGraw-Hill.

 

Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1994). Organizational citizenship behaviors

and sales unit effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Research, 31(3), 351-363.

 

Podsakoff, P. M., Ahearne, M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1997). Organizational citizenship

behavior and the quantity and quality of work group performance. Journal of

Applied Psychology, 82(2), 262-270.

 

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational

citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature

and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563.

 

Podsakoff P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (2006). Organizational citizenship behavior: its

nature, antecedents and consequences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

 

Polat, S. (2009). OCB display levels of the teachers at secondary schools according to

the perceptions of the school administrators. Procedia Social and Behavioral

Sciences, 1, 1591-1596.

 

Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational

commitment, job satisfaction and turnover among psychiatric technicians,

Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603 – 609

 

Rosnarizah Abdul Halim & Zulkifli Abdul Manaf. (2009). Kajian Eksplorasi

Distributed Leadership di Malaysia. Kertas Penyelidikan Prosiding Seminar

Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan ke-16

 

Rosnarizah Abdul Halim & Hussein Ahmad. (2015). Kepemimpinan Distributif, Faktor

Kontekstual Dan Efikasi Kendiri Guru Di Malaysia. Journal Kepimpinan

Pendidikan, 2(4), 47–61.

 

Rutherford, C. Teacher Leadership and Organizational Structure. J Educ Change 7, 59–

76 (2006).

 

Sarros, J. C. And Butchatsky, B. 1996. Leadership: Australia's Top CEOs: Findingout

What Makes Them the Best. Sydney: Harper Collins Publishers. p.214

 

Sayuti Ibrahim. (2013). Tingkah Laku Kepimpinan Pengajaran Guru Besar Dalam

Pemantapan Pengajaran Pembelajaran Guru-Guru Sekolah Kebangsaan Di

Daerah Kinta Utara Perak. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.

 

Sezgin, F. (2005). Organizational citizenship behaviours: A conceptual analysis and

some inferences for the schools. Gazi University, Journal of Gazi Educational

Faculty, 25(1), 317-339.

 

Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2002). Leadership and school results. In K. Leithwood, & P.

Hallinger (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Educational Leadership

and Administration (pp. 561-612). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

 

Siva Rabindarang (2014). Kepimpinan Distributif, Komitmen Organisasi dan Tekanan

Kerja di Kolej Vokasional, Malaysia. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah, Universiti

Pendidikan Sultan Idris

 

Siva Rabindarang, K. W. B. & K. Y. Y. (2014). Refleksi Tenaga Pengajar Terhadap

Kepemimpinan Distributif dan Tekanan Kerja dalam Pendidikan Teknik dan

Vokasional. Akademika, 84(1 & 2), 17–27.

 

Smith, L. M. (2007). Study of Teacher Engagement in Four Dimensions of Distributed

Leadership in One School District In Georgia. Georgia Southern University.

 

Somech, A., & Bogler, R. (2002). Antecedents and Consequences of Teacher

Organizational and Professional Commitment. Educational Administration

Quarterly, 38(4), 555–577.

 

Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating School

Leadership Practice: A Distributed Perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3),

23–28.

 

Spillane, J. P. (2005). Distributed Leadership. The Educational Forum, 69, 143-150

 

Straub, D., Boudreau, M. -C. & Gefen, D. 2004. Validation guidelines for IS positivist

research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 380-

427.

 

Stogdill, R. (1974). Handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New

York: The Free Press.

 

Tambe, S., & Shanker, D. M. (2014). A study of organizational citizenship behaviour

(OCB) and its dimensions: A literature review. International Research Journal

of Business and Management, 1, 67-73.

 

Tschannen-Moran, M. and Woolfolk Hoy, A. (2002) The Influence of Resources and

Support on Teachers’ Efficacy Beliefs. Annual Meeting of the American

Educational Research Association, New Orleans, 1-5 April 2002.

 

Triegaardt, Paul Karel. (2013). The Role Of Distributive Leadership As Strategy To

Ensure Effective Schools: A Comparative Case Study Within Selected South

African Schools, University Of Southern Africa

 

Usma Ali, S. W. (2013). Teachers’ Organizational Citizenship Behavior Working

Under Different Leadership Styles. Pakistan Journal of Psychological

Research,28(2), 297–316.

 

Vlachadi, M. & Ferla.M. (2013). Differentiation of Teachers' and Principals'

Engagement in Distributed Leadership according to Their Demographic

Characteristics. Journal of Education and Learning; Vol. 2, No. 4; Canadian

Center of Science and Education

 

Walz, S. M., & Niehoff, B. P. (1996). Organizational citizenship behaviors and their

effect on organizational effectiveness in limited-menu restaurants. In J. B. Keys

& L. N. Dosier (Eds.), Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings (pp.

307-311).

 

Willis, V. K. (2015). School Structure, Leadership, And Organizational Citizenship

Behavior. University Of Oklahoma.

 

Yurtkorua & Ekmekçia. (2011). Actual and Ideal Leadership Behaviour Shift within

the Last Five Years. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume

24, 2011, Pages 1451-1459

 

Yusof Boon, Y. T. (2013). Kepimpinan Tersebar dan Hubungannya dengan Tekanan

dan Komitmen Kerja. In 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable

Education.

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.