UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Kajian ini bertujuan membangunkan kit pembelajaran Mathematics-Physics Linear
Equation Colour Table (M-PECT) yang boleh memudah cara pembelajaran tentang
perhubungan antara dua pemboleh ubah bagi suatu persamaan linear Fizik dan menilai
kebolehgunaannya dari perspektif murid tingkatan empat. Kajian ini menggunakan reka
bentuk penyelidikan pembangunan berasaskan model reka bentuk instruksional
ADDIE. Selain mengintegrasikan teori pembelajaran konstruktivisme dan teori
kecerdasan pelbagai, kit ini turut mengintegrasikan penggunaan perwakilan pelbagai
dalam reka bentuknya. Sampel kajian terdiri daripada 15 orang murid Fizik tingkatan
empat dari sebuah sekolah aliran perdana kategori luar bandar di daerah Batang Padang,
Perak yang dipilih melalui teknik pensampelan rawak mudah. Kebolehgunaan kit MPECT
diukur menggunakan borang soal selidik skala Likert lima mata yang diadaptasi
dan diubahsuai daripada soal selidik Usefullness, Satisfaction and Ease of Use (USE
questionnaire). Instrumen ini mengandungi 30 item dan empat konstruk
kebolehgunaan. Data kajian dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif iaitu dengan
menghitung Indeks Kesahan Kandungan (CVI), nilai min dan sisihan piawai. Tiga
orang pakar bersetuju bahawa kit M-PECT mempunyai kesahan kandungan yang tinggi
dengan nilai Content Validity Index, CVI=1. Data kebolehgunaan pula menunjukkan
responden bersetuju bahawa kit M-PECT adalah sesuai digunakan dari konstruk
kebergunaan (M=4.07, SP=0.53), mudah digunakan (M=4.00, SP=0.54), mudah
dipelajari (M=3.98, SP=0.60) dan kepuasan (M=4.17, SP=0.52). Kesimpulannya,
kajian ini berjaya membangunkan kit M-PECT yang mempunyai kesahan yang tinggi.
Dari aspek kebolehgunaan kit, murid Fizik tingkatan empat bersetuju bahawa kit MPECT
adalah sesuai digunakan. Implikasinya, kit M-PECT boleh digunakan sebagai
bahan bantu belajar yang mampu membantu murid mengenal pasti dan menyatakan
hubung kait antara dua pemboleh ubah bagi suatu persamaan linear Fizik. Dengan
menggunakan kit ini, secara eksplisitnya guru turut mengintegrasikan penggunaan
perwakilan pelbagai seperti perwakilan persamaan Matematik, lisan/teks, jadual dan
graf dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Fizik. |
| References |
Abdul Said & Normiati. (2017, April 19). Kualiti Pengajaran Guru: Isu dan Cabaran Semasa. Utusan Borneo. https://www.pressreader.com/malaysia/utusanborneo-sabah/20170419/282643212426811. Abdullah, S. (2009). Kecerdasan Pelbagai-Aplikasi dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Wangsa Melawati: PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd. Abdullah, M. F. N. L., & Leow Tze Wei. (2017). Kesahan dan kebolehpercayaan instrumen penilaian kendiri pembelajaran geometri tingkatan satu. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 14 (1), 211-265. Adam, N. A., & Halim, L. (2019). Cabaran pengintegrasian pendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum Malaysia. Seminar Wacana Pendidikan 2019, 252-260. Akiduntire, I. O. (2012). Factors influencing the choice of health science subject atthe senior secondary school level in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(7), 63-67. Alexandru Maries. (2013). Role of Multiple Representations in Physics Problem Solving. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah. University of Pittsburgh. Altan, M., & Arslan, G. L. A. M. (2014). Effectiveness of multiple representations for learning energy concepts : Case of Turkey. Procedia -Sosial and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 627–632. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.269. Azizi Ahmad. (2010). Pentaksiran Pembelajaran. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Bakar,M. T.,Suryadi, D., &Darhim, D. (2019). Learning obstacleson linear equations concept in junior high school students: Analysis of intellectual need of DNR-based instructions. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1157 (2019) 032104. https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1157/3/032104. Baraka, M. N. (2014). Application of ADDIE Model of Instruction in Teaching-Learning Transaction. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(25), 1-10. Berks, D. R., &Vlasnik A. N. (2014).Working thesystem.MathematicsTeacher, 107, 542–546. https://doi.org/10.5951/mathteacher.107.7.0542. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD). Cabello, V. M., Real, C.,&Impedovo, M. A. (2019). Explanations in STEM areas: An analysis of representations through language in teacher education. Research In Science Education. 4, 1087–1106. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9856-6. Caglayan, G., & Olive, J. (2010). Eighth grade students’ representations of linear equationsbased on acupsand tilesmodel. EducationalStudiesin Mathematics, 74, 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-010-9231-z. Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2011). Instructional Design for Teachers: Improving Classroom Practice. New York, NY: Routledge. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2001). Research Methods in Education (5th Edition). London, Routledge. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, And Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th Edition). Boston, MA: Pearson. Crispin, D. E. J., Mary, J. F. L., Maria, R. O. F., Dante, J. P. Z., Amelia, T. B., & Chokchai Y. (2019). Linear equations in two variables STEM education learning activities: Developing the household power consumption calculator app. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1340 (2019) 012048. https:// doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1340/1/012048. David, F. T., Reinders, D., & Hans, E. F. (2017). Models and Modeling in Science Education Volume 10. Switzerland: Springer Nature. Daranee, L., Lucas, M., Jorma, J., & Päivi, P. (2020). The potentials of tangible technologies for learning linear equations. Multimodal and Technology Interaction 4(77), 1-34.https:// doi:10.3390/mti4040077. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (1996). The Systematic Design Of Instruction (4th Ed.). New York: Harper Collins College Publishers. http:/ /www .hastudio. us/5_C V/thesystematicdesignofinstruction.pdf. Faridah Salam. (2015). Kesan Pembelajaran Berasaskan Projek Dengan Scaffolding Terhadap Pencapaian Dan Peningkatan Pembelajaran ICT Pelajar Tingkatan 4. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Funda Savasci-Acikalin. (2019). How middle school students represent phase change and interpret textbook representations: A comparison of student and textbook representations. Research in Science Education. https:// doi.org/ 10.1007/ s11165-019-9834-z. Gardner, H.E.(1983).Frames of Mind-Reflection on Multiple Intelligences, Myths and Messages. New York: Basic books. Goodnough, K. (2010). Multiple intelligences theory: A framework for personalizing sciencecurricula. School Science and Mathematics, 101(4),165-220. Hanafi Jasman. (2004). Salah Tanggapan: Halangan Kepada Penguasaan Konsep Fizik. Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. Hasmiwati & Widjajanti, D. B. (2020). Mathematics learning based on multiple intelligences with scientific approaches: How are their roles in improving mathematical literacy skills? Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1581 012040. Dimuat turun daripada doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1581/1/012040. Iram Naz. (2019). Effect of multiple intelligences’ teaching on academic achievement of high achievers in science at elementary level. Science Education 1(II), 1529. Johari, A. H., & Muslim. (2018). Application of experiential learning model using simple physical kit to increase attitude toward physics student senior high school in fluid. Journal of Physics.: Conf. Ser. 1013 (2018) 012032. https://doi :10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012032. Kaplan, R. G., & Alon, S. (2013). Using technology to teach equivalence. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19, 382–389. https://doi.org/10.5951/teacchilmath.19.6.0382. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Pembelajaran Secara Konstruktivisime. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia.(2012). Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2018). Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah Fizik Tingkatan Empat dan Tingkatan Lima. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. Kementerian PendidikanMalaysia. (2019). Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Standard Sekolah Menengah (Menengah Atas) Dan Pelaksanaan Pakej Mata Pelajaran Mulai Tahun 2020. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Pembangunan Kurikulum. https://www.moe.gov.my/pekeliling/3054-spi-bil-6-tahun-2019-pelaksanaankssm-menengah-atas-dan-pakej-mata-pelajaran-tahun-2020/file. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2019, Mac-April). Jumlah pelajar mengambil STEM kian merosot. https://www.moe.gov.my/penerbitan/2301-infomedia-bil02-mac-april-2019/file. Kenneth, H. & Patricia, H. (2010). Cooperative Problem Solving in Physics a User’s Manual. United States of America: University of Minnesota. Kahfi, R., Wahono, W., & Imam, S. (2019). Pengembangan kit media pembelajaran ipa berbasis saintifik untuk meningkatkanpenguasaan konsep materitata surya padasiswakelasvisd. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Hasil Penelitian, 5(1), 18. Khanlari, A. (2014). Effects of educational robots on learning STEM and on students’ attitude toward STEM. IEEE 5th International Conference on Engineering Education, ICEED,62–66. Kohl, P. B., & Finkelstein, N. D. (2008). Patterns of multiple representation use by experts and novices during physics problem solving. Physics Education Research. 4, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.4.010111. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3),607-610. Larson, M. B., & Lockee, B. B. (2014). Streamlined ID: A Practical Guide to Instructional Design. Oxon: Routledge. Lee, J. H., Phang, F. A., & Bunyamin, M. A. H. (2013). Aplikasi konsep fizik dalam menyelesaikanmasalah yangberasaskanstem bagipelajartingkatanenamatas. 2nd International Seminar on Quality and Affordable Education,470–481. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2013). Kupasan mutu jawapan fizik 2 SPM 2013. http://lp.moe.gov.my/images/bahan/spm/KMJ/KMJ_SPM_2013/4531_2%20FIZIK.pdf. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2013). Kupasan mutu jawapan fizik 3 SPM 2013. http://lp.moe.gov.my/images/bahan/spm/KMJ/KMJ_SPM_2013/4531_3%20FIZIK.pdf. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2014). Kupasan mutu jawapan fizik 2 SPM 2014. http://lp.moe.gov.my/images/bahan/spm/KMJ/KMJ_SPM_2014/Siri%202/Fizik%202.pdf. Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia. (2017). Kupasan mutu jawapan fizik 2 SPM 2017. http://lp.moe.gov.my/images/bahan/spm/KMJ/KMJ_SPM_2017/FIZIK%202 %20(4531_2).pdf. Lim Chong Hin. (2007). Penyelidikan Pendidikan: Pendekatan Kuantiatif dan Kualitatif. Selangor: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia). Lucas, L. L., & Lewis, E. B. (2019). High school students ’ use of representations in physics problem solving. School Science and Mathematics. 119, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12357. Lund, A. M. (2001). Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface, 8(2), 3-6. Lynn, M. R. (1986) Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382-386. Mantyla, T. M., & Hamalainen, A. (2015). Obtaining laws through quantifying experiments: Justificationsof pre-servicephysicsteachersinthecaseof electric current, voltage and resistance. Science and Education. 24, 699–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-015-9752-z. Mara, O., Marja, V. D. H. P., & Michiel, V. (2019). The balance model for teaching linearequations:Asystematicliteraturereview. International Journal of STEM Education 6(30), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0183-2. Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Grift, W., V., D. (2015). A longitudinal study of induction on theacceleration of growth in teaching quality of beginning teachers through the eyes of their students. Teaching and Teacher Education: An International Journal of Research and Studies, 5(1), 225–245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.003. McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2012). Conducting Educational Design Research. New York: Routledge. Meiyuzi, G., Philip, K., & Frederick, O. (2018). Psychometric evaluation of the USE (usefulness, satisfaction, and ease of use) questionnaire for reliability and validity. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 2018 Annual Meeting, 1414 –1418. Mohamed Arip, Fauziah, Norhidayah, Khairiyah BintiMohd Ali, NajwaHananieBinti Athdzar, &Wan Norhasniah BintiWan Abd Rashid. (2014). Faktor, kesan dan strategi menangani permasalahan kurang tumpuan pelajar sekolah menengah di dalam kelas: Suatu kajian kualitatif. http:// digilib. unimed. ac.id/4781/1/Fulltext.pdf. Mohd Majid Konting (2004).Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan.KualaLumpur:Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., & Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing Effective Instruction (5th Edition). United Kingdom: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Muhammad Djajadi. (2015). Proses Pembelajaran Berterusan Dalam Peningkatan Kompetensi Guru Fizik Di Makassar Indonesia.TesisIjazahDr. Falsafah.Johor Bahru: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Nada Aldoobie. (2015). ADDIE Model. American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 5(6), 68-72. Ngu, B. H., Chung, S. F., & Yeung, A. S. (2015). Cognitive load in algebra: Element interactivity in solving equations. Educational Psychology, 35, 271–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.878019. Ngu, B. H., &Phan, H. P. (2016). Comparing balanceand inversemethodson learning conceptual and procedural knowledge in equation solving: A cognitive load perspective. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 11, 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2015.1047836. Ngu, B. H., Phan, H. P., Yeung, A. S., & Chung, S. F. (2018). Managing element interactivity in equation solving. EducationalPsychology Review, 30, 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-9397-8. Nielsen, J. (2000, March 18). Why you only need to test with 5 users. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/why-you-only-need-to-test-with-5users/. Nielsen, J. (2012, January 3). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-tousability/. Nik Azis Nik Pa (1999). Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Radikal Dalam Pendidikan Matematik . KualaLumpur: Penerbit Universiti Malaya. Noraini Idris. (2013). Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill Education. Pallant, J. (2011).SPSS Survival Manual: A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows 4th Edition. NewYork:McGrawHillOpen University Press. Phang, F. A., Abu, M. S., Ali, M. B., & Salleh,S. (2014). Faktor penyumbang kepada kemerosotan penyertaan pelajar dalam aliran sains. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 6371. Pratiwi, W., Rochintaniawati, D., & Agustin, R. (2018). The effect of multiple intelligence-based learning towards students’ concept mastery and interest in matter. Journal of Science Learning, 1(2), 49-52. Rahayu, T., Syafril, S., Wati, W., & Yuberti, Y. (2017). The application of STAD cooperative learning in developing integrated science on students worksheet. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-BiRuNi, 06(2), 247-254. doi:10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v6i2.1933. Reiser, R. A. (2001). Ahistoryof instructionaldesignandtechnology:Partii:Ahistory of instructionaldesign. Educational Technology Research and Development 49, 57–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504928. Richey, Klein & Tracy (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11423-011-9213-6. Rossett, A. (1987). Techniques in Training and Performance Development Series: Training Needs Assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications. SitiHendon Sheikh Abdullah.(2013). Penyampaian konsep fizikdalammatapelajaran sains sekolah rendah oleh guru-guru pelatih sains. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 1(4), 21-27. Stanford, P. (2003). Multiple intelligence for every classroom. Journal of Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(2), 80-85. https:// doi.org/ 10.1177% 2F10534512030390020301. Sulaiman, T., & Hassan, A. (2009). Peranan Minda Dalam Kemahiran Berfikir. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. Taskin, T., &Yavas, P. U.(2019). Examining knowledgelevelsof high schoolstudents related to conductors at electrostatic equilibrium and electric field lines using the drawing method. Research In Science Education. http://doi.org /10.1007/s11165-018-9808-6. Tuckman, B. W., & Waheed, M. A. (1981). Evaluating an individualized science program for community college students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(6), 489-495. Tursucu, S., Spandaw, J., & De Vries, M. J. (2018). Search for symbol sense behavior: Students in upper secondary education solving algebraic physics problems. Research In Science Education, 48(4), 1-27. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11165018-9766-z. Untung N. H. (2019) , What makes introductory physics difficult? Jurnal Saintika UNPAM, 2(1), 28-37. Vinitsky, L., & Galili, I. (2014). The need to clarify the relationship between physics and mathematics in science curriculum: Cultural knowledge as possible framework. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(2014), 611–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.266. Voroshilov, V. (2015). Learning aids for students taking physics. Physics Education, 50(6), 694–698. https://doi:10.1088/0031-9120/50/6/694. Wan Daud, W. A. A., &AbdulGhani, M. T. (2018).Adaptation ofADDIEinstructional model indeveloping educationalwebsite for language learning. Global Journal Al Thaqafah, 8(2),7-16. Wati, S., Fitriana, L., & Mardiyana. (2018). Students’ difficulties in solving linear equation problems. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 983 (2018) 012137. https://doi :10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012137. Yetri, Koderi, Amirudin, Latifah & Apriliana M. D. (2019). The effectiveness of physics demonstration kit: The effect on the science process skills through students’ critical thinking. Journal of Physics.: Conf. Ser. 1155 (2019) 012061. https://doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012061. Yusof, H., Yunus, J., & Musa, K. (2019). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pengurusan Pendidikan. Tanjong Malim: Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. Yusoff, M. S. B. (2019). ABC of content validation and content validity index calculation. Education in Medicine Journal 11(2), 49–54. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2019.11.2.6.
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |