|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| Tujuan kajian ini ialah untuk mengenalpasti adakah terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan terhadap
komponen ujian kecergasan fizikal meliputi ujian bleep, push-up, trunk-Zif, curl-up dan BM!
berdasarkan tingkatan, jantina dan sekolah. Seramai 80 orang subjek yang dipilih secara rawak untuk
menjalani ujian kecergasan daripada 2 buah sekolah menengah di Sandakan iaitu SMK Libaran dan SMK
Muhibbah. Masing-masing seramai 20 orang yang terdiri daripada murid lelaki dan murid perempuan
dari tingkatan l dan tingkatan 2, bagi setiap sekolah. Keseluruhan analisis statistik ujian
kecergasan fizikal dalam kajian ini dianalisis dengan menggunakan 't ies/'. Keputusan kajian
menunjukkan bahawa : (1) Ujian kecergasan berdasarkan tingkatan mendapati ujian bleep tidak
terdapat perbezaan yang signifikan diantara murid tingkatan l dan murid tingkatan 2. Nilai [ (78) =
-1.35, _g = .I 8. Ujian push-up tingkatan 1 dan tingkatan 2, didapati tidak terdapat perbezaan yang
signifikan. Nilai [
(78) = -1.55, _g = .125. Ujian curl-up tingkatan l dan tingkatan 2, didapati tidak
signifikan iaitu nilai [ (78) = -0.39, _g = 0.69. Ujian trunk-liftingkatan 1 dan tingkatan 2,
didapati tidak signifikan iaitu nilai [ (78) = 0.11, _g = 0.90 adalah tidak signifikan. Ujian BM!
tingkatan 1 dan tingkatan 2, didapati tidak signifikan iaitu nilai l (78) = 0.47, .Q = 0.96. (2)
Ujian kecergasan berdasarkan jantina (murid lelaki dan murid perempuan berumur 12 dan 13 tahun)
mendapati ujian bleep adalah signifikan iaitu nilai l (78) = 3.27, 12 = .002. Ujian push-up lelaki
dan perempuan didapati adalah
signifikan iatu nilai l (78) = 2.33, _g = .022. Ujian curl-up lelaki dan perempuan, didapati adalah
tidak signifikan iaitu nilai l (78) = 0.74, Q = .462. Ujian trunk-liflelaki dan perempuan didapati
adalah tidak signifikan iaitu nilai l (78) = -.769, Q = .444. Ujian BMI lelaki dan perempuan
didapati adalah tidak signifikan iaitu nilai [ (78) = -
.131, .Q = .896. (3) Ujian kecergasan berdasarkan sekolah diantara murid di SMK Libaran, Sandakan
dan SMK Muhibbah Sandakan mendapati ujian bleep adalah berbeza secara signifikan, nilai l (78)
=3.09, 12 = 0.003. Ujian push-up murid di SMK Libaran dan SMK Muhibbah didapati adalah signifikan,
nilai [ (78) = 4.00, .Q = 0.00. Ujian curl-up murid SMK Libaran dan SMK Muhibbah didapati adalah
signifikan, nilai l (78) = 10.24, 12 = 0.00. Ujian trunk-lifmurid SMK Libaran dan SMK Muhibbah
didapati adalah signifikan, nilai [ (78) = 4.84, Q = 0.00. Ujian BM/ murid SMK Libaran dan SMK
Muhibbah didapati adalah signifikan, nilai { (78) = 3.69, 12 = 0.00.
Kajian ini menunjukkan bahawa ujian-ujian kecergasan yang dijalankan dipengaruhi oleh faktor-faktor
seperti jantina, umur, kematangan, baka, pemakanan serta limitasi lain seperti peralatan,
persekitaran, pengalaman subjek dan latar belakang subjek,
sehingga mempengaruhi dapatan yang diperoleh.
|
| References |
AAHPERD (1980). Youthfitness test manual. Washington, DC: AAHPER.
Ahmad Hashim. (2004) Normakecergasan fizikal pelajar sains sukan universiti pendidikan sultan idris, tanjong malim. Kajian ilmiah yang tidak diterbitkan. Jabatan Sains Sukan : Fakulti Sains Kognitif Dan Pembangunan Manusia, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.
Ahmad Hashim. (2004). Pengukuran kecergasan. Tanjong Malim : Qantum Book. Alter, J.M. (1988) Science of stretching, Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics Book.
Asiah Mohd Pilus. (2000). Sukan dan gaya hidup aktif. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia : Sangi.
Astrold, I., (1960). Aerobic work capacity in men and women with special reference to age. Acta Physiological Scandinavia 49.
B. Sarjit Sing & Sheik Kamaruddin Sheik Ahmad. (1987), Buku kecergasan malaysia. Serdang: UPM.
Baumgartner, T. A. Jackson, A.S. Mahar, M.T. & Rowe, D.A.(2003). Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science. (7ᵗʰ ed.) New York :McGraw-Hill.
Baumgartner, T.A,. & Jackson, A.S. (1999). Measurement for evaluation in physical education and exercise science (6ᵗʰ ed.). Dubuque, IA: Wm.C. Brown.
Beashel, P., & Taylor, J. (Eds.). (1996). Advanced studies in physical education and sport. Ontario, Canada: Thomson Pub., Co.
Beunen, G., & Malina, R. M. (1988). Growth and physical performance relative to the timing of adolescent spurt. Exercise and Sport Science Review. I 6, 503-540.
Bouchard, C. (1990). Discussion heredity, fitness and health. In Robert P. Pangrazi. (2004) Dynamic physical education.for elementary school children. San Francisco : Pearson Benjamin Cumming.
Bouchard, C., Dionne, F.T., Simoneau, J., & Boulay, M. (1992) Genetics of aerobic and anaerobic perfom1ances. Exercise and Sports Science Review, 20, 27- 58.
In Pangrazi.P.R. (2004) Dynamic physical education.for elementary school San Francisco : Pearson Benjamin Cumming.
Branta, C., Haubenstricker, J., & Seefeldt, V. (1984). Age changes in motor skills during childhood and adolescence. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews. 12, 467-520.
Catledge, K. P. A. (1981 ). Relationship between motor ability and self-concept of fifth-grade boys (Doctoral dissertation, Mississippi State University 1981). Dissertation Abstracts International, 42 (03A), 1047.
Cheah Swee Ming. (1995). Sains dalam sukan. Shah Alam : Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Clarke, H. H. (1971). Physical and motor tests in the Medford boy's growth study. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Corbin dan Lindsey (1997). Concepts of physical fitness with laboratories (th ed.). Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown.
Corbin, C.B. (1973). A textbook of motor development. Dubuque, IA : William C. Brown.
Corbin, C.B., & Noble, I. (1980). Flexibility : a major component of physical fitness. The Journal of Physical Education and Recreation, 51(6), 23-24, 57-60.
Cratty., (1970). Percepual and motor pe,formance development in infants and children. New.York : Macmillan Co.
De Vries, H. A. (1980). Physiology of Exercise for Physical Education and Athletics. Dubuque : Wm. C. Brown.
Ellis, J. D., Carron, A. V., & Bailey, D. A. (1975). Physical performance in boys from 10 to 16 years. Human Biology, 47, 263-281.
Espenschade, A. S. (1963). Restudy of relationships between physical performances of school children and age, height, and weight. Research Quarterly, 34, 144- 153.
Fall, H. B. (1980). Modem concepts of physical fitness. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 51 (2), 25-27.
Fleishman, E. A. (1978). Relating individual differences to the dimensions of human task. Ergonomics, 21, 1007-1019.
Hensley, L.D., East, W.B. & Stillwell, J.L. (1982). Body Fitness and motor performance during preadolescence. Research Quarterly For Exercise and Sports, Vol. 5 (2), 133-140.
Heyward, V. H. (I 991). Advance fitness assessment & exercise prescription (2ⁿᵈ ed.) Champaign, IL : Human Kinetics.
Johnson, B. L., & Nelson, J. K. (1986). Practical measurement for Evaluation in physical education (4ᵗʰ ed.). Louisiana State University: Burgess.
Karlcinski, L. (1945). Relation of intelligence to the learning offundamental muscular skill. Vol. 6.
McKenzie, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Broyles, S. L., & Zive, M. M. (2002). Childhood movement skills: Predictors of physical activity in Anglo American and Mexican American adolescents? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 73(3), 238-244.
Miller,A.. J., Grais. I. M., Winslow, E. & Kaminsky, L.A. (1991).The Definition of Physical Fitness. Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 31:639- 640.
Milne, C., Seefeldt, V., & Reuschlein, P. (1976). Relationship between grade, sex, race, and motor performance in young children. Research Quarterly, 47 (4), 726-30.
Morehouse, L.E.(1963). Sport medicine/or trainers. Philadelphia, W. B. Sounders. Neal, Portsy. (1967). Couching method for women. 2ⁿᵈ Ed.,Addision-Weasley Pab. Cor.
Neil Schmottlach & Jerre McManama (2002). Physical education activity handbook (10ᵗʰ ed.). San Francisco: Benjamin Cummings.
Pangrazi, R.P. (2004) Dynamic physical education for elementary school children. San Francisco : Pearson Benjamin Cumming.
Pangrazi, R.P., & Cobin, C.B. (1990). Age as a factor relating to physical fitness pe,formance. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sports, 61(4), 410-414.
Safrit, M. J., & Wood, T. M. ( 1981,August 13-14 ). The use of motor ability tests to achieve sex-fair ability groupings. Paper presented at the Physical Education Ability Grouping and Performance Evaluation Symposium. Ottawa, IL.
Safrit, M. J., & Wood, T. M. (1989). Measurement concepts in physical education and exercise science. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
Safrit, M. J., & Wood, T. M. (1995). Introduction to measurement in physical education and exercise science (3ʳᵈ ed.). St. Louis: Times Mirror/Mosby.
Seils, L. G. (1951).Agility-performance and physical growth. Research Quarterly, 22, 244.
Sheldon, W. (1954). Atlas for men. New York, Harper and Row.
Shephard, R. J. (1982). Physical activity and growth. Chicago: Year Book Medical.
Tuttle, W.G. (1943). Women and different from men. Science Digest.
Ulrich, C. (1960). Women and sports, science and medicine of exercise and sports. Edited by Johnson, New York, Herper.
Thomas, J. R. & French, K. E. (1985). Gander differences a cross age in motor performance : A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 98 (2), 260-282.
Spilman, T. S. (1983). A study of self-concept in relation to physical fitness and motor ability among elementary, middle, and high school girls (Doctoral dissertation, East Texas State University, 1983). Dissertation Abstracts International, 44
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |