UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
This study was conducted to examine the relationship between the six dimensions of sustainable leadership practices by principals with the level of commitment by secondary school teachers. The sample comprised 269 respondents who were school administrators including senior assistants, Heads of Departments, and secretaries from 8 secondary schools in the district of Lahad Datu. The researchers adapted a modified instrument based on the Sustainable Leadership Model while the Organisational Commitment Questionnaire was used to identify the level of teachers’ commitment. A pilot study was conducted and the Cronbach’s Alpha value indicated high consistency among the items in the questionnaire. Descriptive analysis was then conducted to determine the frequency of sustainable leadership dimensions practised by the principals. Inferential analysis of Pearson Correlation was also conducted to test the hypotheses. The results showed that teachers perceive principals’ sustainable leadership practices to be at a moderately high level. Furthermore, the six dimensions of sustainable leadership had a positive and significant relationship with the level of teachers’ commitment. These findings contribute to the development of sustainable leadership theory and organisational commitment within the educational environment. This suggests that significant attention should be placed on the aspect of sustainable leadership to increase the level of teachers’ commitment. The study also highlights the importance for principals to adopt a sustainable leadership style in administering and managing their schools so that the commitment of teachers can be enhanced and further achieve the vision and mission of the schools. |
References |
Abdul Ghafar, M. N. (1999). Penyelidikan pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Amabile, T. M., Schantzel, E. A., Moneta, G. B., & Kramer, S. J. (2004). Leader behaviours and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. Leadership Quarterly, 15(1), 5-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003 Amin, D. R. A., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2021). Tahap amalan Kepimpinan instruksional guru besar dan hubungannya dengan tahap komitmen guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i2.648 Aslamiah, M. I. A. (2014). Interaksi kepimpinan dan persekitaran pembelajaran dengan kepuasan dan komitmen Gurudi Banjarmasin, Kalimantan (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Utara Malaysia. Awang, M. R. (2014). Pengaruh amalan kepimpinan penolong kanan pentadbiran dan iklim sekolah sihat ke atas komitmen guru di sekolah menengah kebangsaan kluster kecemerlangan (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Utara Malaysia. Awangku. A. D. R., & Mohd, H. M. I. (2021). Tahap amalan kepimpinan instruksional guru besar dan hubungannya dengan tahap komitmen guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(2), 135-151. doi: https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i2.648. Butt, G., & Lance, A. (2005). Secondary teacher workload and job satisfaction: do successful strategies for change exist?. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(4), 401-422. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1741143205056304 Chong, C. K., A. Ghani, M. F., & Abdullah, Z. (2018). Cabaran amalan komuniti pembelajaran dalam kalangan guru Sekolah Rendah Berprestasi Tinggi Malaysia. JuKu: Jurnal Kurikulum & Pengajaran Asia Pasifik, 6(3), 1-14. https://juku.um.edu.my/article/view/14031 Chua, Y. P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan. McGraw Hill. Cochran, J. D. (2001). Role outcomes of school division socialization tactics for middle school principals in Virginia (Doctoral dissertation). Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State Universities. http://hdl.handle.net/10919/29914 Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1985). Research methods in education. Croom Helm. Creswell, J. W. (2002). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative research. Merrill Prentice Hall. Gunter, H., Rayner, S., Thomas, H., Fielding, A., Butt, G., & Lance, A. (2005). Teachers, time and work: Findings from the evaluation of the transforming the school workforce pathfinder project. School Leadership and Management, 25(5), 441-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/13634230500340781 Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of education, 33(3), 329-352. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005 Hamzah, M. I. M., & Sirat, M. (2018). Tahap pelaksanaan latihan dalam perkhidmatan dan hubungannya dengan pengalaman mengajar serta kekerapan menghadiri latihan guru sekolah rendah berprestasi tinggi di Putrajaya. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 43(1), 17-23. https://ejournal.ukm.my/jpend/article/view/43.01-03/7877 Hargreaves, A., & Fink, D. (2003). Sustaining leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(9), 693-700. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F003172170308400910 Hashim, D. A., & Mohd Nor, M. Y. (2019). Tahap kepimpinan coaching guru besar dan kesediaan guru dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran abad ke-21 di sekolah rendah. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 1(1), 50-71. http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijeap/article/view/6725 Ishak, R., & A. Ghani, M. F. (2012). Amalan kepimpinan terbaik untuk sekolah, organisasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 37(2), 35-41. http://www.ukm.my/jurfpend/jurnal%2037(2)/5%20AmalanKepimpinan.pdf Ismail, S. N., Abdullah, Z., Othman, A. J., & Shafie, S. (2018). Amalan komuniti pembelajaran profesional dalam kalangan guru Bahasa Melayu di Selangor. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 5(4), 1-19. https://jupidi.um.edu.my/index.php/JUPIDI/article/view/13996/8702 Jaafar, M. N. (2004). Kepemimpinan pengajaran guru besar, komitmen dan kepuasan kerja guru: Satu kajian perbandingan dan hubungan antara sekolah berkesan dengan sekolah kurang berkesan (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Sains Malaysia. Jalet, S., & Yunus, J. (2021). Designing conceptual framework for a study on the relationship of distributive leadership practices and learning organizations to teachers’ work performance. Management Research Journal, 10(1), 108-122. https://doi.org/10.37134/mrj.vol10.1.8.2021 James, B. L., & Taat, M. S. (2020). Budaya sekolah: Hubungannya dengan komitmen guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 5(10), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i10.511. Jazmi, M. I. (2015). Pengaruh kepimpinan transformasi pengetua terhadap komitmen organisasi dan efikasi kendiri guru sekolah-sekolah agama di Kedah (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Utara Malaysia. Jeong, S., Lim, D., & Park, S. (2016). Leadership convergence and divergence in the era of globalization. In P. O. Pablos & R. D. Tennyson (Eds.), Handbook of Research On Human Resources Strategies for the New Millennial Workforce (pp. 285-308). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0948-6. Joesoef, S. (2009). School leadership challenges towards learning for 21th century. In Proceeding 1st Regional Conference on Educational Leadership and Management (pp. 9-18). Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Jose, S. A., & Mohd Matore, M. E.@ E. (2021). Tinjauan literatur bersistematik: Faktor burnout dalam kalangan Guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(1), 168-186. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i1.628 Karnan, K., & Marimuthu, K. (2021). Gaya kepimpinan kolaboratif pengetua dan tahap kepuasan kerja guru sekolah menengah kebangsaan. Muallim Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 5(2), 191-207. https://doi.org/10.33306/mjssh/133 Kingstrom, P. O., & Mainstone, L. E. (1985). An investigation of the rater-ratee acquaintance and rater bias. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 641-653. https://doi.org/10.5465/256119 Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research educational and psychological measurement. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001316447003000308 Mansor, R., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2015). Kepimpinan berkualiti: Perspektif mengenai kompetensi yang diperlukan untuk memimpin dengan berkesan. Jurnal Pengurusan (UKM Journal of Management), 45, 143-154. http://ejournal.ukm.my/pengurusan/article/view/12187/4152 Mohd Tahir, L., Abdul Rahman, M. A., & Yassin, M. (2009). Strategi kepimpinan lestari/mapan pengetua. Malaysia Education Deans’ Council Journal, 4, 26-38. Muzzafar, M. & Jamalullail, A. W. (2020). Kepimpinan lestari pengarah dan hubungannya dengan amalan Pembelajaran Sepanjang Hayat (PSH) pensyarah di Institut Pendidikan Guru (IPG) Wilayah Selatan. Jurnal Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 33(1), 69-82. http://eprints.iab.edu.my/v2/1112/1/JURNAL33%20BIL1.2020%20%2820Dis2020%29%20-%20Artikel%207.pdf Nnaji, S. E., & Uzoigwe, M. C. (2021). Sustainable leadership and school accountability management as determinants of students’ performance during COVID-19 era in Ebonyi State, Nigeria. International Journal of Public Administration and Management Research, 6(3), 81-91. http://journals.rcmss.com/index.php/ijpamr/article/view/79 Othman, N., & Md. Omar, H. (2014). Beban tugas dan motivasi pengajaran guru di sekolah menengah daerah Ranau. Jurnal Pemikir Pendidikan, 5, 35-57. https://silo.tips/download/beban-tugas-dan-motivasi-pengajaran-guru-di-sekolah-menengah-daerah-ranau Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Lahad Datu. (2016). Statistik bilangan guru dan murid. Unit data. Pejabat Pendidikan Daerah Lahad Datu. Porter, L. W., & Smith, F. J. (1970). The etiology of organizational commitment (Unpublished paper). University of California, Irvine, 970. Raja Harman Shah, R. N., & Mohd Nor, M. Y. (2021). Amalan kepimpinan lestari guru besar dan kepuasan kerja guru di Sekolah Kebangsaan Padang Jawa Shah Alam. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 3(1), 385-393. http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/jdpd/article/view/12933 Saberi, N. S. N., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2020). Amalan kepimpinan lestari guru besar dan keberkesanan sekolah kebangsaan di Hulu Langat, Selangor. JuPiDi: Jurnal Kepimpinan Pendidikan, 7(3), 20-37. https://jupidi.um.edu.my/article/view/25059 Sala, F. (2003). Leadership in education: Effective U.K. college principals. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(2), 171-189. https://doi.org/10.1002/nml.28 Satangah@Salim, L., & Abdullah, M. K. (2021). Komitmen organisasi sekolah dan hubungannya dengan kualiti pengajaran guru Bahasa Melayu tahap satu di luar bandar Sabah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(1), pp. 159-167. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i1.618 Silam, D., Pang, V., & Lajium, D. (2021). Kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah di pulau negeri Sabah: Satu kajian kes. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 6(40), 293-307. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v5i12.557 Supian, H., & Daud, K. (2014). Amalan kepimpinan lestari dan hubungannya dengan prestasi kerja guru sekolah rendah yang menerima tawaran baru di daerah Segamat. Sains Humanika, 2(4), 197-208. https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v2n4.488 Teharaja, A. M., & Hamid, A. H. A. (2021). Hubungan antara amalan kepimpinan transformasi guru besar dan komitmen guru sekolah Tamil di daerah Klang, Selangor. International Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(1), 49-70. http://myjms.mohe.gov.my/index.php/ijeap/article/view/12814 Veloo, A., & Kiew, H. B. (2012). Hubungan antara kerja berpasukan dengan kepuasan kerja ketua panitia sekolah menengah. International Journal of Management Studies (IJMS), 19(1), 175-191. http://repo.uum.edu.my/6166/ Visser, W., & Courtice, P. (2011). Sustainability leadership: Linking theory and practice. https://www.cisl.cam.ac.uk/system/files/documents/sustainability-leadership-linking-theory-and.pdf SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1947221 Yusof, M. R., & Wahab, A. J. (2019). Kepimpinan instruksional pengetua dan hubungannya dengan komitment guru di Sekolah Berprestasi Tinggi (SBT) di daerah Seremban. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 4(33), 107-121. https://doi.org/10.35631/IJEPC.433009
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |