UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About
Menu Icon

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LC Special aspects of education
Main Author :Chong, Yok Fong
Title :Perbandingan elemen tanggungjawab dalam pemikiran Immanuel Kant dengan agama Kristian
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Sains Kemanusiaan
Year of Publication :2022
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Kajian ilmiah ini berfokus kepada empat objektif kajian iaitu menganalisis elemen tanggungjawab Immanuel Kant, mentafsir ajaran tanggungjawab dalam agama Kristian, membandingkan elemen tanggungjawab Immanuel Kant dan agama Kristian serta merumuskan sejauh mana Immanuel Kant dikatakan bersifat sekularisme dalam menghujahkan konsep tanggungjawab. Dengan ini, pendekatan kualitatif yang berpaksikan kaedah perbandingan menjadi tunjang metodologi kajian. Hasil kajian mendapati bahawa elemen tanggungjawab Immanuel Kant iaitu pengetahuan, kehendak, kebebasan, dan perbuatan menampakkan persamaan yang ketara dengan apa yang diajar dalam agama Kristian. Apa yang membezakan pandangan Immanuel Kant dengan agama Kristian ialah elemen tanggungjawab Immanuel Kant adalah berpusatkan tiga prinsip Kategorikal Imperatif iaitu kesejagatan, kemanusiaan dan kesatuan. Manakala tanggungjawab dalam agama Kristian pula adalah berpaksikan keimanan kepada Triniti iaitu Tuhan Bapa, Tuhan Anak dan Roh Kudus. Hasil dapatan ini seterusnya menjadi hujahan kukuh untuk membuktikan bahawa Immanuel Kant bukan seorang ahli falsafah sekular yang menafikan sama sekali kewujudan Tuhan. Kesimpulannya, dapat dirumuakan bahawa aliran pemikiran Immanual Kant tentang tanngungjawab menampakkan banyak persamaan dengan ajaran Kristian itu sendiri. Diharapkan kerangka konseptual yang membandingkan persamaan dan perbezaan pandangan Immanuel Kant dan ajaran agama Kristian berhubung dengan tanggungjawab dapat menjadi asas untuk memperlebar kajian-kajian lain yang boleh membandingkan konsep tanggungjawab Immanuel Kant dengan agama lain.

References

Acton H.B. 1970. Kant’s Moral Philosophy. London: Macmillan and Co Ltd. 

Albi Anggito & Johan Setiawan. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.  Sukabumi: CV Jejak. 

American Bible Society Resources, A Brief Description Of Popular Bible Translations (https://bibleresources.americanbible.org/resource/a-brief-description-of-popular-bible-translations) 

Anon. 2011. What is the heart, according to the Bible?. https://www.compellingtruth.org [17 November 2019] 

Banner M. 2009. Christian Ethics A Brief History. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. 

Barackman F. H. 2001. Examining the Great Doctrines of the Faith - Practical Christian Theology Fourth Edition. Kregel Academic: Grand Rapids. 

Benner D C. 2007. Immanuel Kant’s demythologization of Christian theories of atonement in Religion within the limit of Reason Alone. EQ 79.2. 99-111 

Beyleveld D & Ziche P. 2015. Toward A Kantian Phenomenology of Hope. Ethic Theory Moral Practical. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10677-015-9564-x.pdf 

Bible New International Version. diperoleh daripada https://www.biblegateway.com 

Birsch B. 2002. Ethical Insight A Brief Introduction. McGraw-Hill: Boston. 

Bloom J.2015. What is Your Doing Saying. https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/what-is-your-doing-saying [5 Januari 2020] 

Bryman A. 2008. Social Research Methods. New York: Oxford University Press. 

Chalier C. 2002. What Ought 1 to Do. Morality in Kant and Levinas. London: Cornell University Press. 

Crook R.H. 2007. An Introduction of Christian Ethics. Canada: Pearson Prentice Hall. 

Davies P. 1992. The Mind of God The Scientific Basis for a Rational World. New York: Simon & Shusster Paperbacks. 

Deizell D. 2013. Why God Is Looking at Your Heart. The Cristian Post Contributor 

Dewi Nur Harasha Alias. 2019. Buang bayi: Selepas nenek, ibu dan bapa pula ditahan polis http://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/buang-bayi-selepas-nenek-ibu-dan-bapa-pula ditahan-polis-206034 [28 Disember 2017] 

Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. 2007. United States of America: Baker Book House Company  

Fox R M, Demarco J P. 2001. Moral Reasoning: A Philosophic Approach To Applied Ethics. Orlando: Harcourt College Publishers. 

Encyclopedia Britannica. 1768. Kantianism Philosophy. https://www.britannica.com [16 Mei 2021] 

Fairchild M. 2019. Are Christians Justified by Faith or by Works? Reconciling the Doctrines of Faith and Works. Learn Religion. https://www.learnreligions.com/christian-justification-by-faith-or-works-700638 [1 Januari 2020] 

Fredriksen P. 2018. When Christian Were Jews The First Generation. New Haven: Yale University Press. 

Fredriksen P & Reinhartz A (pnyt.). 2002. Jesus, Judaism Christian and Anti-Judaisme. Kentucky: Westminster John Knox Press. 

Flick U (pnyt.). 2014. The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis. London: SAGE Publication Ltd. 

Fox R M, Demarco J P. 2001. Moral Reasoning: A Philosophic Approach To Applied Ethics. Orlando: Harcourt College Publishers. 

Goldstein C R. 2015. The First Freedom. North American Division of the Seventh-day Adventist Church.  

Guyer P (pnyt.). (2006). The Cambridge Companion To Kant And Modern Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.  

Hare J E. 2009.  God And Morality A Philosophical History. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell A John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Publication 

Heeren J. 2019. “What Does "Do Unto Others" (The Golden Rule) Mean in the Bible?” https://www.biblestudytools.com/bible-study/topical-studies/what-does-do-unto-others-mean-in-the-bible.html [30 Disember 2020] 

Hill T. E. (pnyt.). 2009. The Blackwell Guide to Kant’s Ethics. Southern Gate: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 

Holmes R L. 1998. BasicMoral Philisophy. Boston: Wadsworth Publishing Company. 

Holzhey H & Mudroch V. 2005. Historical Dictionary of Kant and Kantianisme. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press, Inc. 

Hornby A S. 2001. Oxford Fajar Advanced Learner’S English Malay Dictionary. Terj. Asmah Haji Omar. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Fajar Bakti 

H. Zainal Abidin. 2021. Implementasi Etik dalam Perspektif Moral dan Agama Medianya Orang Cerdas. Sulawesi Tengah: Radar Sulteng Membangun. 

Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP). 1995. https://iep.utm.edu/home/about/ [26 Februari 2018] 

Kant I. 1819. Logic. Terj. John Richardson, London: W. Simpkin R. Marshall. Stationers' Court, Ludgate-Street. https://archive.org/details/logiclogic00kant [20 September 2018] 

Kant I. 1780, The Metaphysical Elements Of Ethics. Terj. Thomas Kingsmill Abbot https://www.gutenberg.org/files/5684/5684-h/5684-h.htm [23 Ogos 2019] 

Kant I. 1871. The metaphysic of ethics. Terj. J. W. Semple. Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark. https://archive.org/stream/cu31924029021562?ref=ol#page/n5/mode/2up [27 Mac 2020] 

Kant I. 1889. Kant’s Critique of Practical Reason and Other Works on the Theory of Ethics. Terj. Thomas Kingsmill Abbott, Longmans, Green, and Co. https://oll-resources.s3.useast2.amazonaws.com/oll3/store/titles/360/Kant [2 April 2020] 

Kant I.  1960. Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone. Terj. Theodore M. Greene and Hoyt H. Hudson. New York: Harper & Brother.  

Kant I. 1981. Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals with On a Supposed Right to Lie Because of Philanthropic Concerns. Terj. James W. Ellington. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc. 

Kant I. 1998. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Terj. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   

Kant I.  1998. Religion within the Boundaries of Mere Reason And Other Writings. Terj Allen Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press.  

Kant I. 1998. Religion and Rational Theology On the miscarriage of all philosophical trialsa in theodicy. Terj. Allen Wood dan George Di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Kant I. 1998. Critique of pure reason Terj. Paul Guyer & Allen W. Wood. New York: Cambridge University Press I998.  

Kant I.  2002. Critique Of Practical Reason Terj. Werner S. Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.  

Larson M. L. (1998). Meaning-Based Translation A Guide to Cross-Language Equivalence. Lanham: University Press of America. 

Life Application Study Bible New International Version. 1998. Illinois: Tyndale House Publisher, Inc. 

MacKinnon B. 2015. Ethics Theory and Contemporary Issues. United State of America: Cengage Learning. 

Matthew G.B (pnyt.). 2002. Augustine On the Trinity Book 8-15. Terjemahan Stephen McKenna.  New York: Cambridge University Press 

McCarthy. 1986. Quest for A Philosophisal Jesus, Christianity and Philosophy in Rousseau, Kant, Hegel, and Schelling. Macon: Mercer University Press. 

Miller B. 2015. Does Freedom have Boundaries?. BibleResources.org. https://bibleresources.org/bible-freedom-boundaries/ [12 January 2019] 

Mohd. Janib Johari. 1994. Moral Teori Applikasi dan Permasalahan. Johor Bahru:Cetak Ratu Sdn Bhd. 

Mortimer R. C. 1950. Christian Ethics. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. 

Muhammad Atiullah Othman. 2015. Tanggungjawab dalam Pemikiran Ibnu Taymiyyah dan Immamuel Kant. Tesis Ph.D. Bangi: UKM. 

Muhammad Atiullah Othman. 2015. Konsep Tanggungjawab: Analisis Perbandingan antara Istilah Duty Menurut Immanuel Kant dan Istilah al-Taklif Menurut Ibnu Taymiyyah. Jurnal Perspektif Jil. 7. Bil 1 (22-29) ISSN 1985 – 496X. 

Muhammad Atiullah Othman, Indriaty Ismail & Ibrahim Abdu Bakar. 2015. Rasional dan Agama dalam Justifikasi Baik dan Buruk Menurut Immanuel Kant. Jurnal Perspektif Jil. 7. Bil 3 (59-67) ISSN 1985 – 496X. 

New World Encyclopedia. 2007. Noumenon https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org [23 Februari 2019] 

Noor Mohamad Shakil Hameed. 2016. Henti Budaya Menuding Jari. Utusan Malaysia. .http://www.utusan.com.my/rencana/utama/henti-budaya-menuding-jari [28 Disember 2017] 

Noresah bt. Baharom (pnyt.). 2010. Kamus Dewan edisi keempat. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. 

Otto Allen Bird (pnyt.). 2021. Brittanica Last years of Immanuel Kant https://www.britannica.com/biography/Immanuel-Kant/Last-years 

Oxford English Dictionary. 2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 

Palmquist S R. 2016. Comprehensive Commentary on Kant’s Religion Within the Bounds of Bare Reason. Malden: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 

Parrinder G (pnyt.). 1971. World Religions From Ancient History to the Present. New York: Facts On File Publications 

Plantinga A. 2000. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press. 

Plantinga A. 2015. Knowledge and Christian Belief. Cambridge: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. 

Pojman L.P. 2001. Ethics Discovering Right & Wrong. Canada: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.  

Riggle K. 2001. Freedom, Knowledge and Relationship In the Genesis Story of Temptation. Denison Journal of Religion Volume 1 Article 3. Denison University  

Schaefer G.E. 1996. Responsibility. Michigan: Baker Books 

Siti Uzairiah Mohd Tobi. 2017. Kajian Kualitatif dan Analisis Temu Bual. Kuala Lumpur: Aras Publisher. 

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2002. Philosophy and Christian Theology. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/christiantheology-philosophy/ 

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2010. Immanuel Kant. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant/ 

Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. 2014. Kant's Philosophy of Religion. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-religion/ 

Sørensen A. 2008. Deontology – Born And Kept In Servitude By Utilitarianism. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy, Vol. 43, 69-96. https://pure.au.dk/portal/files/508/53340-DYP_3_069-096K.pdf. [7 Julai 2020] 

Soroski J. 2019. What Does "Bible" Mean and How Did it Get That Name? https://www.biblestudytools.com/bible-study/explore-the-bible/what-does-bible-mean.html [9 Oktober 2020] 

Stump, Eleonore & Kretzmann, Norman (pnyt.). 2002. The Cambridge Companion To Augustine. New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Sullivan R J. 1994. An Introduction to Kant’s Ethics. Cambrige University Press: Cambrige. 

Seyyed Mohammad Musavi Moqaddam1, Ali Almasi, Shima Mahmudpur Qamsar. 2015. A Review of Theory of Immanuel Kant: Distinguish of the Realm of 

Religion and Science. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy. Vol 6 No 6 S4 December 2015.  

Taylor S J, Bogdon R, Devault M. 2015. Introduction to Qualitative Research Method: A Guidebook and Resource. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 

The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy (IEP)(ISSN 21610) https://iep.utm.edu/ [6 Januari 2020]  

Theodore Mawuli Kwaku Viwoto. 2014. God Will Judge Our Motives And Intents. https://www.modernghana.com/news/526947/god-will-judge-our-motives-and-intents.html [29 Disember 2020] 

Thiroux J.P. 2001. Ethics: Theory and Practice. USA: Prentice Hall. 

Tim May. 2006. Social Research Issues, Methods and Process. Open University Press: United Kingdom. 

Timothy Sng. 2018. The Good Son, What our Father in Heaven expecst of us. Thomas Nelson. Inc.    

Tovermiller. 2018. Lesson 7: Form and Meaning in English Bible Translation. https://shepherdthoughts.com/baptistchurchny/lesson-7-form-and-meaning-in-english-bible-translations/ [25 April 2021] 

Walters K (pnyt.). 2011. The Age of Reason. Canada: Broadview Editions.  

Ware B A. 2011. Father, Son, and Holy Spirit: The Trinity as Theologial Foundation. The Journal of Family Ministry. Volume 1 Issue 2. Spring / Summer 2011. 

Wood W.A. & Giovanni G.D. 1996. Religion and Rational Theology. New York: Cambridge University Press. 

Zeuschner R B. 2001. Classical Ethics: East and West. Boston: Mc Graw Hill. 

 

 

 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries, kindly contact us at pustakasys@upsi.edu.my or 016-3630263. Office hours only.