UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
| As a Post May Fourth scholar, Ch’ien Chung Shu had gained a deep foundation for tradition studies from home, as well as underwent professional training on Western Literature. Thus, his literary perspective was much wider, familiar with the tradition and modern studies within Eastern and Western world. While comparing the Chinese and Western studies, the May Fourth scholars tended to promote “new voices” from the foreign land, taking strategic of enlarged th e advances of Western studies plus highlighted the defect of Chinese studies, in order to shape the legality of New Literature. On the contrary, the Xueheng School 学衡派 tended to absorb new nutrients from the Western Classical Literature, even analyzed the Chinese tradition studies from Western perspective . Regrettably, the Xueheng School was considered as the opposition during the New Literature Movement, their appr oach usually obscured by the tense confrontation between the new and tradition studies. Between 1932 35, Ch’ien Chung Shu graduated from the Department of Foreign Languages, Tsinghua University, then became a young lecturer in Shanghai Guanghua University. He had published a series of Chinese and English book reviews, including papers in Tsinghua Weekly, Crescent Monthly, Ta Kung Pao, Guofeng Bimonthly, T’ien Hsia Monthly publications. In early review articles, when Ch’ien Chung Shu analyzed the Song Dynast y literary theory and poetry, he borrowed the ideology of “take the old as the new”, discussed about the breakthrough of the literary power circle. His English papers not only formed dialogue with the overseas sinologists, but also moved forward from the f oundation of Xueheng School, which included the tradition studies within Western vision. He mentioned that through the meetings of the tradition and modern studies within Eastern and Western world, we could place the Classics in the literary history and th e art palace.
|
| References |
一、中文著作 钱锺书，《宋诗选注· 苏轼》（ 1958 年），北京：人民文学出版社， 1997 。 ————，《谈艺录 补订重排本（上） 》（ 1948 年），北京： 生活·读书·新知三联书店，20 0 1 。 爱默，《钱锺书传稿》，天津：百花文艺出版社，1992 。 龚刚，《钱锺书爱智者的逍遥》，北京：文津出版社，2004 。 胡志德著、张晨等译，《钱锺书》，北京：中国广播电视出版社，1990 。 吴宓著、王岷源译，《文学与人生》，北京：清华大学出版社，1993 。 吴宓著、吴学昭整理，《吴宓诗话》，北京：商务印书馆，2005 。 二、期刊论文、文章 中书君（钱锺书），〈 （评）中国新文学的源流 〉 ，《新月》月刊第 4 卷第 4 期（ 1932年）。 ——〈 （评）近代散文钞（两卷 〉 ，《新月》月刊第 4 卷第 7 期（ 1933 年）。 ——〈 中书君诗 〉 ，《国风》半月刊第 6 卷第 3 、 4 合期（ 1 935 年）。 ——〈 论复古 〉 ，《大公报 · 文艺副刊》第 111 期（ 1934 年 10 月 17 日）。 龚刚，〈 浅析钱锺书对苏东坡赋的英文评论 〉 ，《中国比较文学》第 3 期（ 2010 ）。 张丽华，〈 通向一种“参差对照”的史观 对钱、周之争的再思考 〉 ，收入《现 代中国“短篇小说”的兴起》，北京：北京大学出版社， 2 011 。 三、英文文献 钱锺书，《钱锺书英文文集》，北京：外语教学与研究出版社，2005 。 ——Book Note II, Tsinghua Weekly 《清华周刊》 XXXVI (1932) ——On ‘ Chinese Poetry, The Chinese Critic 《中国评论周报》 VI 1933 ——Foreword to the Prose poetry of Su Tung P’o 1935 ——Tragedy in Old Chinese Drama, from T’ien Hsia Monthly 《天下月刊》 I 1935 ——Correspondence:To the Editor in Chief of T’ien Hsia T’ien Hsia Monthly （《天下月 刊》） IV 1937
|
| This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |