Kepimpinan instruksional melalui Kajian Tindakan: kajian kes pengetua cemerlang

Rasyidi Johan

Abstract

Kajian Tindakan (KT) merupakan satu kaedah untuk membantu guru membuat penambahbaikan terhadap amalan pengajaran yang dilakukan. Justeru, kajian ini bertujuan untuk meneroka dan memahami cara seorang Pengetua Cemerlang menggunakan KT sebagai alat kepimpinan instruksional dalam usaha untuk membangunkan kompetensi guru. Memandangkan kajian bertujuan untuk meneroka dan memahami, maka penyelidik telah memilih reka bentuk penyelidikan kualitatif. Pengumpulan data telah dilakukan dengan menggunakan kaedah temu bual separa struktur dan analisa terhadap beberapa dokumen yang berkaitan dengan pelaksanaan KT. Data telah dianalisis secara tematik di mana tema-tema telah dibangunkan berdasarkan soalan kajian yang telah dibina. Di antara tema yang diperoleh ialah Pengetua Cemerlang ini telah menggunakan KT sebagai alat kepimpinan instruksional untuk merancang dan membina program instruksional, memastikan strategi pengajaran guru membawa implikasi yang positif terhadap pembelajaran murid dan akhirnya melalui KT bimbingan instruksional dapat dijalankan. Memandangkan penyelidikan ini telah dijalankan dari perspektif kepimpinan sekolah dicadangkan juga kajian lanjut dijalankan dari perspektif guru. Ini kerana, guru merupakan agen pelaksana dan akan mempunyai persepsi yang berbeza jika dibandingkan dengan pemimpin sekolah.

References

Alpaydin, E., & Kaynak, C. (1998). Cascading classifiers. Kybernetika, 34(4), 369-374. Abduraxmanovich, J. U. (2020). Modeling the pedagogical experience of England as a factor of improving the quality of training future teachers. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(04).

Amin, D. R. A., & Hamzah, M. I. M. (2021). Tahap amalan kepimpinan instruksional guru besar dan hubungannya dengan tahap komitmen guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 6(2), 135-151.

Arumugham, K. S. (2020). Kurikulum, pengajaran dan pentaksiran dari perspektif pelaksanaan pentaksiran bilik darjah. Asian People Journal (APJ), 3(1), 152-161.

Baturay, M. H., Gökçearslan, Ş., & Ke, F. (2017). The relationship among pre-service teachers' computer competence, attitude towards computer-assisted education, and intention of technology acceptance. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 9(1), 1-13.

Braun, V., Clarke, V., & Hayfield, N. (2019). ‘A starting point for your journey, not a map’: Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 1-22.

Creswell, J. W. (2017). CUSTOM: CEC edition qualitative inquiry and research design. SAGE Publications.

Desimone, L. M., & Pak, K. (2017). Instructional coaching as high-quality professional development. Theory into practice, 56(1), 3-12. Eisner, E. W. (2017). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Teachers College Press.

Elstad, E., & Christophersen, K. A. (2017). Perceptions of digital competency among student teachers: Contributing to the development of student teachers’ instructional self-efficacy in technology-rich classrooms. Education Sciences, 7(1), 27.

Galimullina, A., Galimullin, F. G., Meliksetyan, V., & Kayumova, G. (2019). The role of interactive technologies in training future teachers of Russian literature. ARPHA Proceedings, 1, 181.

Gillard, J. W. (2018). An initial analysis and reflection of the metrics used in the Teaching Excellence Framework in the UK. Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 22(2), 49-57.

Kim, M. K., Xie, K., & Cheng, S. L. (2017). Building teacher competency for digital content evaluation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 309-324.

Laudonia, I., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Abels, S., & Eilks, I. (2018). Action research in science education–an analytical review of the literature. Educational Action Research, 26(3), 480-495.

Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34-46. Manfra, M. M. (2019). Action research and systematic, intentional change in teaching practice. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 163-196.

Mei Kin, T., Abdull Kareem, O., Nordin, M. S., & Wai Bing, K. (2018). Principal change leadership competencies and teacher attitudes toward change: the mediating effects of teacher change beliefs. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(4), 427-446.

Mu, G. M., Liang, W., Lu, L., & Huang, D. (2018). Building pedagogical content knowledge within professional learning communities: An approach to counteracting regional education inequality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 24-34.

Sasmal, I. H., & Pande, M. H. (2018). Action research through mentorship model: A sustainable framework for professional development. 2 Dear Reader, 60(5), 25.

Schreier, M. (2018). Sampling and generalization. The Sage handbook of qualitative data collection, 84-98.

Shogren, K. A., Raley, S. K., Rifenbark, G. G., Lane, K. L., Bojanek, E. K., Karpur, A., & Quirk, C. (2021). The Self-Determined Learning Model of Instruction: Promoting implementation fidelity. Inclusion, 9(1), 46-62. Szeto,

E., & Cheng, A. Y. N. (2018). Principal–teacher interactions and teacher leadership development: Beginning teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 21(3), 363-379.

Szeto, E., Sin, K., & Leung, G. (2021). A cross-school PLC: how could teacher professional development of robot-based pedagogies for all students build a social-justice school? Professional Development in Education, 47(1), 141-155.

Tindowen, D. J., Guzman, J., & Macanang, D. (2019). Teachers' conception and difficulties in doing action research. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(8), 1787-1794.