UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
Start | FAQ | About

QR Code Link :

Type :thesis
Subject :LB Theory and practice of education
Main Author :Lim, Ee Yie
Title :A study on levels and views of classroom assessment literacy of primary school teachers
Place of Production :Tanjong Malim
Publisher :Fakulti Bahasa dan Komunikasi
Year of Publication :2022
Corporate Name :Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
PDF Guest :Click to view PDF file
PDF Full Text :Login required to access this item.

Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
Classroom Assessment is slowly replacing standardized examinations in Malaysia primary schools. In year 2020, it is announced by the Ministry of Education that the examination for primary pupils is abolished, and pupils will be assessed through Classroom Assessment. Therefore, teachers’ assessment knowledge and competence has become a concern for many. The main purpose of this study is to investigate the level of assessment literacy of primary school English Language teachers and their views on assessment literacy and classroom assessment in primary schools. For this study, survey and interviews is used to gain insights regarding the research questions outlined. Data is collected through survey and interview sessions. The data gained from inventory survey is analyzed using descriptive analysis through IBM SPSS 23. The data gained from interview sessions is analyzed using thematic analysis where the data was tabulated and grouped according to its themes. The research shows that most teachers (80%) have fair assessment literacy. Most of the respondents also suggested that more workshop should be held and more training should be provided.


Al-Malki, M. A. & Weir, K. (2014). A comparative analysis between the assessment criteria used to assess graduating teachers at Rustaq College (Oman) and GrifthUniversity (Australia) during the teaching practicum. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(12), 28-42. 

Allen, M. (2017). The sage encyclopedia of communication research methods (Vols. 1-4). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc doi: 10.4135/9781483381411 

Amineh, R.J., & Asl, H. D. (2015). Review of constructivism and social constructivism. Journal of Social Science, Literature and Languages, 1 (1), 9-16. 

Anastasia, B. (2019, September 23). Understanding Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory. Retrieved from development-theory/ 

Bakhary, N. (2019, January 29). Classroom Assessment Implementation: Students’ Progress Oriented Learning Assessment. Retrieved from 

Barbour, Rosaline S. and Schostak, John (2011). Interviewing and focus groups. In: Somekh, Bridget and Lewin, Cathy eds. Theory and Methods in Social Research (Second Edition). London, UK: Sage Publications Ltd, pp. 61–68. 

Bayat, K. & Rezaei, A. (2015). Importance of Teachers’ Assessment Literacy. International Journal of English Language Education 2015, Vol. 3, No. 1. 

Behera, D., & Jena, S. S. (2017). Assessment of students' learning through constructive approach. Odisha. 

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press. 

Che Noraini Hashim, Adlina Ariffin, Nurhidayah Muhammad Hashim. (2013). Ideal vs. reality: Evidences fromsenior teachers’experiences on the Malaysian school-based assessment system (SBA). Prosiding Seminar Majlis Dekan-dekan Pendidikan IPTA. Serdang, Selangor: Universiti Putra Malaysia. 

Climie, E., & Henley, L. (2016). A renewed focus on strengths‐based assessment in schools. British Journal of Special Education, 43(2), 108-121. 

Coombe, C., Vafadar, H. & Mohebbi, H. Language assessment literacy: what do we need to learn, unlearn, and relearn?. Lang Test Asia 10, 3 (2020). 

Coon, D., & Mitterer, J. O. (2011). Psychology: Modules for active learning.Cengage Learning. 

Creswell, J. W. (2011). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. 

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education Ltd. 

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

Crusan, D., Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2016). Writing assessment literacy: Surveying second language teachers’ knowledge, beliefs, and practices. Assessing Writing, 28, 43–56. 

Etikan, T., Musa, S.A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4. 

Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 Integration Challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. Retrieved from 

Fullan M (2011) Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform. Available from: /13501655630.pdf. 

Ho K. Y. (2018, December 26) Education groups: Removing exams good, but fine tune assessment system. Free Malaysia Today. Retrieved from 

Jeong, H. (2013). Defining assessment literacy: Is it different for language testers and non-language testers? Language Testing, 30(3), 345–362. 

Looi-Chin Ch’ng, Soubakeavathi Rethinasamy. (2013). Englsih Language Assessment in Malaysia: Teachers' Practices in Test Preparation. Issues in Language Studies (Vol. 2 No. 2) . 

Kwiek, M., & Szadkowski, K. (2018). Higher education systems and institutions,Poland. Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions,1-10. 

Macky, A. & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and Design. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Asoociates. 

Marczyk, G., Dematteo, D. & Festinger, D. (2005). Essentials of Research Design and Methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 

McMillan, James H. (2000). Fundamental Assessment Principles for Teachers and School Administrators. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, Vol. 7, Article 8. Retrieved from DOI: 

Menon S. & Priya S. S. (2018, November 1) No exams for lower primary. The Star Online. Retrieved from 

Mertler, C. A. (2003, October). Preservice versus inservice teacher’ assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? Paper presented at the annualmeeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Columbus, OH. 

Mertler, C. A. (2004). Secondary teachers' assessment literacy: Does classroom experience make a difference? American Secondary Education, 49-64. 

Ministry of Education Malaysia (2013). Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013-2025.Putrajaya: Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 

Mohamed, S., Kamis, A. & Ali, N. (2016). Gauging the assessment literacy of Malaysia’s home economics teachers: An empirical study. Geografia: Malaysian Journal of Society and Space, Vol 12, No 3. 

Nemati, M., Alavi, S. M., Mohebbi, H., & Masjedlou, A. P. (2017). Teachers’ writing proficiency and assessment ability: the missing link in teachers’ written corrective feedback practice in an Iranian EFL context. Language Testing in Asia,7(1), 21. 

Norazilawati Abdullah. (2012). Pelaksanaan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme dalam Mata Pelajaran Sains. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris: Perak. Abdullah, N., Mohamed Noh, N., Mansor, R., Mohamed Hashim, A. T., & Kung Teck, 

W. (2015). Penilaian pelaksanaan Pentaksiran Berasaskan Sekolah (PBS) dalam kalangan Guru Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Dan Matematik Malaysia, 5(1), 89-102. 

Peterson, P. L., Baker, E., & McGaw, B. (2010). International Encyclopedia of Education. Elsevier Ltd. 

Piosang, T. L. (2017).A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Classroom Assessment Literacy of English Teachers in Secondary and Tertiary Levels. Educational Measurement and Evaluation Review(2017), Vol. 8 Issue 1. 

Rajaendram R., Lee C. & Menon S. (2018, December 20) No more term exams for pupils. The Star Online. Retrieved from 

Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., & Chi, L. J. (2018). CEFR-aligned school-based assessment in the Malaysian primary ESL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(2), 452-463. 

Sh. Siti Hauzimah Wan Omar. (2018). Pengetahuan, Kemahiran, Sikap dan Masalah Guru dalam Melaksanakan Pentaksiran Bilik Darjah Bahasa Melayu di Sekolah Rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu –JPBM, 9(1), 56-67. 

Singh, C. K. S. S., Singh, H. K. J., Singh, T. S. M., Moneyam, S., Abdullah, N. Y., Zaini, M. F. (2022). ESL teachers' assessment literacy in classroom: A review of past studies. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, Vol. 18, No. S1, May 2022, 1-17 

Stiggins RJ. The Principal’s Leadership Role in Assessment. NASSP Bulletin. 2001;85(621):13-26. 

Stiggins, R. J. (2006). Assessment for Learning: A Key to Student Motivation and Learning. Phi Delta Kappa Edge, 2(2), 1–19 

Teng, A. (2018, August 22) In support of abolishing primary exams. The Star Online. Retrieved from 

Tong, J. (2014). Education Dilemma in Malaysia. Singapore: Partridge. 

Tong, S. Y. A. (2016). Exploring students’ perception of and reaction to feedback in school–based assessment. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 7(2), 44. 

University of Nebraska-Lincoln | Web Developer Network. (n.d.). Standards for teacher competence in Educational Assessment of Students. Retrieved August 6, 2022, from 

Van den Branden, K. Sustainable education: basic principles and strategic recommendations. School Eff. School Improv. 2012, 23, 285–304. 

Vinney, C. (2019, January 29). What Is the Zone of Proximal Development? Definition and Example. Retrieved from 

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 

Wong K. T. (2013, March 27) PBS system confuses teachers. The Star Online.Retrieved from 

Webb, Norman. (2002). Assessment Literacy in a Standards-Based Education Setting. 

Xu, Y., & Brown, G.T.L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice: A reconceptualization. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149-162. 

Yamtim, V. & Wongwanich, S. (2013). A study of classroom assessment literacy of primary school teachers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116 ( 2014 ) 2998 – 3004. Retrieved from 

Yates, A., & Johnston, M. (2018). The impact of school-based assessment for qualifications on teachers’ conceptions of assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 638-654. 

Yip, C., Han, N. L. R., & Sng, B. L. (2016). Legal and ethical issues in research. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 60(9), 684. 

Zhao, X., Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. V. D. & Veldhuis, M. (2017). Classroom assessment in the eyes of Chinese primary mathematics teachers: a review of teacher-written papers. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 52, 42-54. 


This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page

Installed and configured by Bahagian Automasi, Perpustakaan Tuanku Bainun, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris
If you have enquiries with this repository, kindly contact us at or Whatsapp +60163630263 (Office hours only)