UPSI Digital Repository (UDRep)
|
|
|
Abstract : Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris |
Kajian ini bertujuan untuk menilai pelaksanaan program STEM guru Sains dan Matematik
sekolah rendah di negeri Perak berdasarkan Model Penilaian CIPP (Konteks, Input, Proses
dan Produk) yang diasaskan oleh Stufflebeam, D.L. Kajian ini adalah berbentuk kuantitatif.
Pemilihan sampel kajian adalah menggunakan kaedah persampelan rawak berstrata yang
melibatkan seramai 300 orang guru STEM sekolah rendah dari 10 daerah di negeri Perak.
Satu set instrumen soal selidik digunakan sebagai instrumen kajian untuk mendapatkan data.
Data yang dikumpul dianalisis menggunakan kedua-dua cara deskriptif dan inferens.
Dapatan menunjukkan keseluruhan min konteks 3.46 (SP=1.07), keseluruhan min input 3.76
(SP=1.11), keseluruhan min proses 4.04 (SP=1.02) dan keseluruhan min produk 3.80
(SP=1.06). Analisa Kolerasi Pearson menunjukkan terdapat hubungan yang kuat antara
dimensi input dengan dimensi produk (r = 0.438). Manakala hubungan antara dimensi
konteks dengan dimensi produk (r = 0.309), dan hubungan antara dimensi proses dengan
dimensi produk (r = 0.362) berada pada tahap sederhana kuat. Implikasi kajian ini
menunjukkan keadaan kemudahan di bengkel dan makmal sekolah masih memerlukan
perhatian. Peruntukan masa silibus tentang STEM adalah tidak mencukupi bagi
mengadakan sesi amali. Lebih banyak latihan dan kursus berkaitan dengan kaedah
pengajaran STEM dan kaedah penilaian STEM diperlukan. |
References |
Abd Khahar & Saprani. (2012). Pengajaran komponen teknologi maklumat dan komunikasi dalam Kursus Perguruan Lepasan Ijazah. University of Malaya. Abdul Rahim Hamdan. (2006). Menguasai Penyelidikan Dalam Pendidikan: Teori, Analisis dan Interpretasi data. (1st ed.). PTS Professional Publishing Sdn. Bhd. Abu Bakar Noordin. (1990). Kurikulum: Perspektif dan Pelaksanaan. Penerbitan pustaka Antara. Abu Bakar Noordin. (1992) Penilaian Afektif. Masa Enterprise. Abu Hassan Kasim. (1998). Panduan Penyelidikan dalam sains sosial. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Ahmad Ismail. (2018). STEM Pacu Bidang Sains. Utusan Malaysia. Ahmad, Nursyahirah & Lajium,D. (2020). Persekitaran Pembelajaran dan Minat Dalam Kerjaya STEM. International Journal of Modern Education. 2. 28-49. 10.35631/IJMOE.26004. Ahmad Nahdzan Ayob. (1992). Kaedah Penyelidikan Sosioekonomi. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Alkin, M. (1991). Evaluation theory development. In M. W. McLaughlin & D. C. Phillips (Eds.), Evaluation and education: At quarter-century(90th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II) (pp. 91-112). University of Chicago Press. Aminah Binti Jekri & Crispina Gregory, K.H. (2020). Cabaran dalam Melaksanakan Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran STEM di Sekolah Menengah. International Journal of Education, Psychology and Counselling (IJEPC), 5 (34). pp. 80-90. ISSN 0128-164X. Ahmad Rafee (2021). Kolokium Pendidikan STEM peringkat Kebangsaan. Avery, Z. K., & Reeve, E. M. (2013). Developing Effective STEM Professional Development Programs. Journal Of Technology Education, 25(1). doi:10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.4. Awad, N., & Barak,M. (2014). Sound, Waves and Communication: Students’ Achievements and Motivation in Learning a STEM Oriented Program. Creative Education, 5, 1959-1968. Azizi Bin Jaafar. (2015). Penilaian Pelaksanaan Kurikulum Pendidikan Islam Sekolah Menengah Berasaskan Model Context- Input- Process- Product (CIPP). Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM). Azizi Yahya. (2001). Penggunaan Model Kontek, Input, Proses dan Produk (KIPP) dalam penilaian program pembelajaran. Sejauhmanakah ia relevan?. Retrieved: 2019-07-23. Azizi Yahya,. (2007) Menguasai Penyelidikan dalam Pendidikan, PTS Profesional. Becker,K. & Park,K. (2011). Effects of intergratif approaches among Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: A preliminary meta-analysis. Journal of STEM Education. 12(5&6):23-27. Berita Harian. (2009). Kerajaan risau penurunan pelajar pilih aliran STEM. Berita Harian. Brown-Schild, V. B, &Powell-Moman, A. D.,. (2011). The influence of a two-year professional development institute on teacher self-efficacy and use of inquiry- based instruction. Science Educator, 20(2), 47–53. Bunyamin, Muhammad Abd Hadi. (2015). Pendidikan STEM Bersepadu: Perspektif Global, Perkembangan Semasa di Malaysia, dan Langkah Kehadapan. Buletin Persatuan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik Johor. 25. 1-6. Bybee, R. W. (2013). The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Arlington, National Science Teachers Association. Bybee, R.W. (2010). Advancing STEM Education: A 2020 Vision. Technology & Engineering Teacher. 70(6):5-9. National Science Teachers Association. Chua, Y.P. (2006). Asas Statistik Penyelidikan. Kuala Lumpur: McGraw-Hill (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd. Cohen L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th edition) Routledge-Falmer. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks. Eko Putro Widoyoko, S. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran. Pustaka Pelajar. Farida Yusuf. (2000). Evaluasi Program. Rineka Cipta. Fritz, J,J., Miller-Heyl, Kreutzer, J.C. dan Mac Phee, D. (2001). Fostering personal teaching efficacy through staff development and classroom activities. The Journal of Educational Research, 88 (4):200-208. Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application (7th ed.). Pearson Education. Guerra-Lopez, I. J. (2008). Performance Evaluation: Proven Approaches for Improving Program and Organizational Performance. John Wiley&Sons, Inc. Hamid Hassan. (2009). Evaluasi Kurikulum, cetakan kedua. Remaja Rosdakarya . House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1998). Deliberative democratic evaluation in practice.University of Colorado. Hussin, S. & Zakuan, N. (2009).Modal Insan.60:40 Dalam Sains & Teknologi. Tinta Publishers. Ibrahim Mamat. (1996). Reka bentuk dan pengurusan latihan - konsep dan amalan.Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. International Bureau of Education (IBE). 2016. Sharing Malaysia Experience in Participation of Girls in STEM Education. UNESCO. James Geofferey W. Molijoh. (2012). Penilaian Input dan Produk Kurikulum Komponen Kesusasteraan Bahasa Inggeris di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Penampang. Universiti Malaysia Sabah. Jamil Ahmad. (2002). Pemupukan budaya penyelidikan di kalangan guru di sekolah.Satu penilaian. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jamunarani & Siti Raihamah (2021) Kesediaan Guru Matematik dalam Melaksanakan Pendidikan STEM. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. JS Mazlini Adnan , Aminah Ayob , Ong Eng Tek , Mohd Nasir Ibrahim, Noriah Ishak (2016). Memperkasa pembangunan modal insan Malaysia di peringkat kanakkanak: Kajian kebolehlaksanaan dan kebolehintegrasian pendidikan STEM dalam kurikulum PERMATA Negara. GEOGRAFIA OnlineTM : Malaysian Journal of Society and Space. Kamaleswaran, J., Rohaida Mohd Saat., & Rose Amnah Abdul Rauf. (2014). A review of science, technology, engineering & mathematics (STEM) education research 1999-2013: A Malaysian perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 155-163. Kamisah Osman & Rohaida Mohd Saat. (2014). Editorial: Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education in Malaysia. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 10(3), 153-154. Kasza, P., & Slater, T. F. (2017). A Survey Of Best Practices And Key Learning Objectives For Successful Secondary School STEM Academy Setting. Contemporary Issues in Education Research – First Quarter 2017. 10(1), 53– 66. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2012). Laporan Tahunan 2013 Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia. Kerajaan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2014). Pelan Tindakan Inisiatif Pengukuhan Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) Gelombang 1 Pelan Pembangunan Pendidikan Malaysia 2013-2025. Kerajaan Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Panduan pelaksanaan Sains, Teknologi, Kejuruteraan dan Matematik (STEM) dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran. BPK, Kementerian Malaysia. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Laporan Inisiatif Perkukuhan STEM 2016. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan KPM. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2017). Laporan Kajian Kesedaran Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) dalam kalangan murid, guru, pentadbir sekolah dan ibu bapa. Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan KPM. Kementerian Sains, Teknologi dan Alam Sekitar. (2003). Dasar Sains dan Teknologi Negara Kedua dan Pelan Tindakan. Perpustakaan Malaysia. Koehler, C., Binns, I. C., & Bloom, M. A. (2016). The emergence of STEM. Routledge. Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. American Journal of Applied Psychology 30, 607-610. Kubiszyn, T., & Borich, G. (1996). Educational testing and measurement. (5th ed.).Harper Collins College Publishers. Latifah, I., Asfadillah, C. and Sukmana, R. (2012) History and development of IFRS and AAOIFI and their future challenge. Working paper, Cambridge Business and Economics Conference. Cambridge University. Malaysian Science and Technology Information Center (MASTIC). A Study on the awareness of Science and technology Malaysia. 12 Jun 2021. https://mastic.mestecc.gov.my/sti-survey/public-awareness-science- technology-innovation-sti-malaysia Maulana, R., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Grift, W. v. d. (2015). A longitudinal study of induction on the acceleration of growth in teaching quality of beginning teachers through the eyes of their students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 51(2015), 225–245. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2015.07.003 Mellors-Bourne, R., Connor, H. dan Jackson, C. (2011). STEM Graduates in Non- STEM Jobs. Careers Research and Advisory Centre (CRAC) Ltd. Mergawati Zulfakar. (2014). PM: Let’s make STEM cool and aim for 60%. 18 Mac 2020.http://www.thestar.com.my/News/Nation/2014/09/24/PM-Lets-make- STEM-cool-and-aim-for-60-Ignite-passion-among-the-young-Najib-says/ Merill, C. (2009). The future of TE masters degree: STEM. Presentation at the 70th annual International technology education association conference, Louisville. Meyrick, K.M.. (2011). How STEM Education Improves Student Learning. Meridian K-12 School Computer Technologies Journal, 14(1). Miliken,D., & Adams, J. (2010). Recommendations for Science, technology, engineering and mathematics education. Report to Christine Gregoire, Governor, and the Washington state legislature. In S. w groupe (Ed.). Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction. Mohamad Hj. Ikhsan. (1998). Komponen Aktiviti Kokurikulum (AK) dalam Kursus Diploma Perguruan Malaysia (KDPM) di Maktab Perguruan Sekitar Kuala Lumpur. Universiti Malaya. Mohamad Najib Abdul Ghafar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohamed Najib. (2016). Prinsip Asas Penilaian Program Pendidikan. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd Majid Konting (1998), Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. c. 4. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Najib Abdul Gahafar (2003). Reka Bentuk Tinjauan Soal Selidik Pendidikan.Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd Norlizam bin Mohd Razali (2017). Penilaian Program Intervensi Tambah Opsyen (PITO) dalam Kalangan Guru Sejarah bukan Opsyen di Sekolah Menengah. Falkuti Pendidikan dan Pembangunan Manusia Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. UPSI. Mook, S. (2006). Ilmu Pendidikan untuk KPLI Sekolah Rendah: Komponen 1&2 Psikologi Pendidikan dan pedagogi. Kumpulan Budiman. Munn, D., & Drever, E. (1990). Using Questionnaires in Small Scale Research: A Teacher’s Guide. Scotland Council for Research in Education (SCRE) Publication. Mustam, Afian & Adnan, Mazlini. (2018). Perception of Primary Mathematics Teachers on STEM-oriented Teaching and Learning. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris. UPSI. Nadelson, L.s., Callahan,J.,Pyke P., Anne Hay, Matthew Dance & Pfiester,J. (2013). Teacher STEM Perception and Preparation: Inquiry- Based STEM Profesional Development for Elementary Teachers. The Journal of Educational Research. 106(2) Nistor, A., Angelopoulos, P., Gras-Velazquez, A. et al. (2019) STEM in primary education. Scientix Observatory. Noor Baizura Bahrum & Mohd Ali Samsudin. (2021). Kesan Pendekatan Pembelajaran STEM Secara Teradun Dalam Bilik Darjah Sains. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 5 (1), 12–22. 12 Universiti Sains Malaysia. Norasmah Othman. (2002). Program keusahawanan remaja di sekolah menengah .Universiti Putra Malaysia. Norazilawati Abdullah. (2021). Pendidikan Sains pada Era Revolusi Industri. Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris.UPSI. Nor Azlina Ahmad. 2015. Kesediaan Guru Dalam Pendidikan Integrasi Science, Engineering, Technology and Mathematics (STEM). Universiti Sains Malaysia. Nor Shai'rah Yunus. (2015). Kesediaan guru melaksanakan pengajaran dan pembelajaran pendidikan STEM. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Nur Azlina Ahmad (2015) Kesediaan guru dalam Pendidikan integrasi STEM. Universiti Sains Malaysia. (Tesis sarjana tidak diterbitkan) Nur Amelia, Lilia (2019) Cabaran Pengintegrasian Pendidikan STEM Dalam Kurikulum Malaysia. Seminar Wacana Pendidikan 2019. Nur Diyana binti Zakariah (2016). Pengetahuan, Sikap dan Kreativiti Guru Sains Sekolah Rendah Terhadap Pendidikan STEM. Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Nur Fatahiyah Mohamed Hata & Siti Nur Diyana Mahmud, (2020) Kesediaan guru Sains dan Matematik dalam melaksanakan pendidikan STEM dari aspek pengetahuan, sikap dan pengalaman mengajar. AKADEMIKA, 90 (3(SI)). pp. 85-101. ISSN 0126-5008 Nursyahirah Ahmad (2020) Persekitaran Pembelajaran dan Minat Dalam Kerjaya STEM International Journal of Modern Education. 2(6):28-49 DOI:10.35631/IJMOE.26004 Othman,Mohamed . (2001). Penulisan Tesis dalam Bidang Sains Sosial Terapan. Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. Oziah Othman. (2015). Pembangunan Modul Pengajaran Kreatif Pendidikan STEM (Modul PK-STEM). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Pang, Vincent. (2015). Curiculum Evaluation: An Application in a Smart School Curiculum Implementation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah. Quimbo, S. L. A. (2010). Explaining math and science achievement of public school children in the Philippines. Philippine Review of Economics, 40(2). Ramli, Aini & Ibrahim, Nor & Surif, Johari & Bunyamin, Muhammad Abd Hadi & Jamaluddin, Rahimah & Abdullah, Noorul. (2017). Teachers' readiness in teaching stem education. Man in India. 97. 343-350. Richards, A. (2001). Teaching and Learning English A Guide to Recent Research Application. Continuum. Sander, M.(2009). STEM, STEM Educations, STEM mania. The Technology Teacher.68(4):20-26. Sekaran. (2000). Research methods for buisness: A Skill building approach. Ed. 3.New York: John Wiley & Sons. Shane Hall (2012), How to Use the CIPP Model for Program Evaluation. eHow Contributor. Shamsuddin & Noorashikim (2021). Kesediaan Guru STEM Melaksanakan Pendidikan STEM di Sekolah Pesisir Pantai. Kelantan: International Journal of Education, Islamic Studies and Social Science Research. Shapiee@Shafie Lugom. (2002). Program Pendidikan Khas di Sarawak: satu penilaian. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM). Sharifah Nor Puteh, and Kamarul Azman Abd Salam, (2011) Tahap kesediaan penggunaan ICT dalam pengajaran dan kesannya terhadap hasil kerja dan tingkah laku murid prasekolah . Jurnal Pendidikan Malaysia, 36 (1). pp. 25-34. ISSN 0126-6020 / 2180-0782 Shernoff, D.J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D.M. & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing Teacher Education and Professional Development Needs for the Implementation of Integrated Approaches to STEM Education. International Journal of Science. Siew N.M. @ Sopiah Abdullah, Nazir Amir & Chon C.L. (2015). The perceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers regarding a project-based STEM approach to teaching science. Fakulti Psikologi dan Pendidikan, Universiti Sabah Malaysia. Smith, Vinson, Lewin & Stetzer. (2014). STEM Teacher Education and Professional Development and Training: Challenges and Trends. Huazhong University of Science & Technology Sneideman JM (2013) Engaging Children in STEM Education EARLY! Feature Story. Natural Start Alliance and NAAEE. Available from: http://naturalstart.org/feature-stories/engaging-children-stemeducation-early. Stufflebeam, D. L. (2007). CIPP Evaluation Model Checklist, A tool for applying the CIPP Model to assess long-term enterprises: Evaluation Checklists Project. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2007). Evaluation theory, models and applications. Jossey-Bass. Stufflebeam, D.L. & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic Evaluation. Kluwer-Nijhoff. Stufflebeam, D.L. (1971). Education Evaluation and Decision Making. F.E. Peacock Publisher, Inc. Stufflebeam, D.L., Herold & Beulah,M.K. (2003). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. Annual Conference of Oregon Program Evaluators Network (OPEN). Stufflebeam. D.L. (1971). The Relevance of CIPP Evaluation Model for Educational Accountability. Journal of Research and Development in Education 5(1): 19- 25 Stufflebeam. D.L. (2000). Lessons in Contracting for Evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 21, 293-314. Suharsimi Arikunto dan Cepi Safrudin. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasisiwa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara Tan H.L. (1998). An Evaluation of the postgraduate teacher education for science in selected Malaysia teacher training colleges. University Malaya. (Tesis sarjana tidak diterbitkan) Terry,J.J (2001). Evaluasi Proses Belajar Mengajar Senaman Melalui Masukan dan Proses Model Context, Input, Process, dan Product (CIPP) di SLTP. Universitas Negeri Manado. Thomas, T.A. (2014). Elementary teachers’receptivity to integrated science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education in the elementary grade. University of Naveda, Reno. Thorndike, B.L. and E.P. Hagen, 1977. Measurement and Evaluation in Psychology and Education. 4th Edn., John Wiley & Sons Inc. Tuan Mastura Tuah Soh, Kamsiah Osman, Nurazidawati Mohamad Arsad. (2012). M- 21CSI: A Validated 21st century Skills Instrument for secondary Science Student. Canadian Center of Science and Education. 6(8):38-44 Tyler, R. W. (1950). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press. U.S. National Science and Technology Council. (2013). Federal Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education 5 years strategic plan: A report from the Committee of STEM Education National Science and Technology Council. Retreived December 12, 2019 from https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_stratplan_ 2013.pdf Unit Perancangan Ekonomi.(2010). RMK-10 Rancangan Malaysia kesepuluh 2011- 2012. Jabatan Perdana Menteri Wang, H., Moore, T.J., Roehrig, G.h.&Park, M.S. (2011). STEM Integration: Teacher Perception and Practise STEM Integration: Teacher Perception and Practise. The Journal of Educational Research 1(2). Warr, P.,Bird,M. & Rackham,.(1970). Evaluation of management training. Gower Press. Widoyoko, E.P. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran : Panduan Praktis Bagi Pendidik dan calon Pendidik. Pustaka Pelajar. Worthen, B.R., & Sanders, J.R. (1987). Educational Evaluation. Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. Longman. Worthen, B.R., & Sanders, J.R. (1998). Educational Evaluation. Theory and Practice. Wadsworth.. Yap Y.K.., Wan., Chwee Sen., & Ismail Abu Bakar. (1986). Pengukuran dan Penilaian dalam Pendidikan. Heinemann (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Yildirim, B., & Selvi, M. (2016). Examination of the effects of STEM education integrated as a part of science, technology, society and environment courses. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 3684-3695. Zainal. (2005). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Rosda Zawawi Bin Ismail. (2008). Penilaian Pelaksanaan Bahasa Kurikulum Kemahiran bertuturBahasa arab Komunikasi di sekolah Menangah Kebangsaan Agama. Universiti kebangsaan Malaysia.
|
This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials. You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research. |