Abruscato, J. (2000). Teaching children Science. A discovery approaches. (5th ed.). Washington: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Allyn & Bacon.

Arzi, H. J. & White, R. T. (2008). Change in Teachers’ Knowledge of Subject Matter:A 17-Year Longitudinal Study.Science Education,92,221–251.

Afifah, Nuraznan & Maryam (2022). Hubungan Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Penguasaan Bahasa Arab. Jurnal Akademi Pengajian Islam Kolej Universiti Islam Melaka.2 (7). 110-140. https://kuim.edu.my/journal/index.php/JULWAN/article/view/1193

Ahmad Tarmimi (2016). Tahap Kefahaman dan Salah Konsep Terhadap Konsep Daya Dan Gerakan Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat. Jurnal Fizik Malaysia. 37(1). 01090-01101.

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2000). Attitude and the attitude behavior relation: reasoned and automatic process. European review of Social Psychology. (11), 1-33.

Allport, G. W. (1967). Gordon W. Allport. In E. G. Boring & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Ahistory of psychology in autobiography, 5 (1),1-25. Appleton-Century-Crofts. https://doi.org/10.1037/11579-001

Andrew P. & Robert J. (2019). Chapter 2 - Descriptive Statistics II: Bivariate and Multivariate Statistics,Statistics for Biomedical Engineers and Scientists, Academic Press, Pages 23-56. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780081029398000116

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Razavieh, A., & Sorensen, C. (2006). Introduction to Research in Education (7 ed.).

Azlina & Nik Ahmad. (2021). BBL-Phyeascys Mengubah Persepsi dan Sikap Pelajar Terhadap Fizik. Journal on Technical and Vocational Education (JTVE), 6 (2).0128-0821. http://upikpolimas.edu.my/ojs/

Babbie, Earl R. (2002). The basics of social research. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning.

Badlilshah. (2016). Analisis Sikap terhadap Pembelajaran Fizik dan Hubungannya dengan Pencapaian dalam kalangan Pelajar Pra Universiti di sebuah Kolej Matrikulasi.

Bloom, B.S. (1956) Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook: The Cognitive Domain. David McKay, New York.

Darmaji, D., Astalini, A., Kurniawan, D.A. & Perdana, R. & Putra, D.S. (2019). A study relationship attitude toward physics, motivation, and character discipline students’ senior high school, in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning and Teaching, 11(3), 99-109. https://doi.org/10.18844/ijlt.v11i3.4207

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 1(6), 297-334

Ebenezer, J. V., & Zoller, U. (1993). Grade 10 student perception and attitude towards science and school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(2), 175-186.

Fraser, B. J. (1982). How strongly are attitude and achievement related? School Science Review, 63, 557-559.

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: the theory of multiple intelligences. New York, Basic Books.

Hill, R. (1998). What sample size is “enough” in internet survey research? Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 6(3-4).

Hestenes, D., Wells, M., & Swackhamer, G. (1992). Force Inventory Concept. The Physics Teacher, 30(3), 141-158.

Katz, Victor J. (1998). A history of mathematics: an introduction. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.

Krejcie, R.V. and Morgan, D.W. (1970) Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30 (1), 607-610.

Megowan, C. (2016). American Modeling Teachers Association, PhysPort. Diperolehi daripada https://www.physport.org/

Kirya, K. R., Nuru, T. S., & Yadav, L. L. (2022). Conceptual understanding of force concepts in the Ugandan context: A thread assessing performance and misconceptions. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 2(1), em008.https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/12049

Lestari. (2021). Hybrid learning on problem-solving abiities in physics learning: A literature review. Diperolehi daripada https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012021/meta

Likert, R. (1932). A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of Psychology, 22 140, 55.

Madiah (2014). Recent Advances and Applications of Spiral Dynamics Optimization Algorithm: A Review. Fractal and Fractional. 6. 27. 10.3390/fractalfract6010027.

Martin, R., Sexton, C., & Franklin, T. (2009). Teaching Science for All Children: An Inquiry Approach. Pearson Education.

Mahendran, K., Adenan, N. H., Abd Karim, N. S., Adawiyah, R., & Md Junus, N. W. (2021). Analisis Tahap Pengetahuan Pedagogi Kandungan (PCK) Guru Pelatih Matematik: Analysis Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Level of The Mathematic Trainee Teachers. Jurnal Pendidikan Bitara UPSI, 14, 72–81. https://doi.org/10.37134/bitara.vol14.sp.8.2021

Marat, D. (2005b). Assessing self-efficacy of diverse students from secondary schools in Auckland: Implications for academic achievement. Issues in Educational Research, 15(1), 37-68. http://www.iier.org.au/iier15/marat.html

Meor & Hatimah (2020). Tahap Kefahaman dan Pengaplikasian Konsep Daya dan Tekanan Dalam Kehidupan Seharian Dalam Kalangan Pelajar Tahun Akhir Program Pendidikan Fizik. Tidak diterbitkan.

McLeod, S. A. (2019). Likert scale. Simply Psychology. Diperolehi daripada www.simplypsychology.org/likert-scale.html

Mubarak. (2019). Tahap Pemahaman Pelajar dan Guru Dalam Konsep Daya dan Gerakan.Diperolehi daripada http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/32563/1/MohammadMubarakMohd.YusofMFP2012.pdf

Mukhtar, Nur Maizatul & Hashim, Faizal & Abdul Wahab, Nor Aimi & Hasan, Suhaiza & Mohd Napiah, Noorezal & Mokhtar, Marina. (2017). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Fizik: Satu Sudut Pandangan. International Research Journal of Social Sciences. 3. 195.

Mustafa, F, & Meric, T. (2019). Integrating Augmented Reality into Problem Based Learning: The effects on learning achievement and attitude in physics education. Diperolehi daripada https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0360131519301885

Mohamad, A.Z., & Said, H. (2018). Tahap Kefahaman Dan Amalan Guru Pelatih Matematik terhadap Pembelajaran Inkuiri-penemuan Semasa Latihan mengajar.

Nasr, A. R. (2011). Attitude towards Biology and Its Effects on Student Achievement. International Journal of Biology, 3(4), 100-104.

Nurmelda Patric & Roslinda Rosli. (2020). Pengetahuan pedagogi dan isi kandungan guru opsyen Matematik dalam pengajaran Topik Pecahan. Jurnal Dunia Pendidikan, 2 (1): 92-101.

Norbaizura.(2019).Kajian Permasalahan Pelajar Dalam Pembelajaran Fizik 1.

Normiati & Abdul Said. (2019). Pengaruh Pengajaran Guru Terhadap Kualiti Pengajaran Guru. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (MJSSH), 4(2), 30 – 42.

Nasr, A. R. (2011). Attitude towards Biology and Its Effects on Student Achievement. International Journal of Biology, 3(4), 100-104.

Nurulhuda Abdul Rahman, Ong Eng Tek, Abdul Rahman Omar, Noor Azman Razali, & Razak Abdul Samad Yahya. (2011). The Development and Validation of Learning Attitude About Physics (LAAP) Inventory. Jurnal Sains & Matematik, 3(1), 7-17.

Osborne, J., & Collin, S. (2001). Pupil's View of the Role and Value of Science Curriculum. International Journal of Science Education, 23(5), 441-467.

Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collin, S. (2003). Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and its Implication. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.

Popham, W. (1995). Classroom Assessment: What Teacher Need to Know. Boston: Simon & Schuster Company.

Phang, F. A., Mohd Salleh Abu, Mohammad Bilal Ali, & Salmiza Salleh. (2010). Faktor Penyumbang kepada Kemerosotan Penyertaan Pelajar Dalam Aliran Sains: Satu sorotan Tesis. Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Rohana & Shaharom. (2008). “Hubungan Antara Amalan Kerja Amali Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar Tingkatan 4 Dalam Tajuk Daya”. Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Sains dan Matematik, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai.

Sekaran, U. (2009) Research Method for Business: A Skill Building Approach. 4th Edition, Wiley India, New Delhi.

Sabilan, Sapie & Mohamed Lip, Suhana & Ishak, Mohamad & Zdainal Abidin, Shazarina & Sulaiman, Suziana. (2022). Analisis Tahap Pendidikan Terhadap Kesediaan Guru Melaksanakan Pembelajaran Secara Teradun Berasaskan Kemahiran Teknologi. 17. 50-60.

Sulaiman. (2021). Tahap Penggunaan dan Kefahaman Murid dalam Penggunaan Gabungan Pakej Bahan Bantu Mengajar Multimedia dalam Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran Sejarah. Malaysian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. 6(3). 252-258. https://doi.org/10.47405/mjssh.v6i3.694

Suresh. (2011). An overview of randomization techniques: An unbiased assessment of outcome in clinical research. Journal of human reproductive sciences. 4. 8-11.10.4103/0974-1208.82352.

Syamsul. (2012). Ciri-Ciri Kajian Tinjauan. Diperolehi daripada https://cikgusyamsp.blogspot.com/2012/05/kajian-tinjauan.html#

Tatar, E. (2011). Prospective primary school teachers’ misconceptions about states of matter. Educational Research and Reviews, 6, 197- 200

Tuan Mastura, T., Nurzidawati, M., & Kamisah, O. (2010). The Relationship of 21 century Skills on Students's Attitude and Perception Towards Physics. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 7(2), 546-554.

Wilson, L. (1954). A Study of Opinions Related to the Nature of Science and its Purpose in Society. Science Education, 38(2), 159-109.

William, C., Stanisstreet, M., Spall, K., Boyes, E., & Dickson, D. (2003). Why aren't secondary students interested in physics? Physics Education, 38(4), 324-329.

Wham, M. A. (1987). Metacognition and Classroom Instruction. Reading Horizons: A Journal of Literacy and Language Arts, 27 (2). https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/reading_horizons/vol27/iss2/ 3

Yahaya, Noraffandy and Lee Kwan How. (2010). Kajian terhadap faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pencapaian pelajar 4SPP dan 4SPF dalam subjek Fizik di Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.